Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for هیئت قرار

Channel

هیئت قرار

@Heyate_gharar

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,227subscribers

-189 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001472435950
TypeChannel
Username@Heyate_gharar
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Heyate_gharar

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Heyate_gharar/48881 · this entry17 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC@khane_madahi_ir/1421217 Aug 2026, 18:29 UTC0.98under a minute
@Heyate_gharar/48808 · this entry15 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC@khane_madahi_ir/1414115 Aug 2026, 05:34 UTC0.98under a minute
@Heyate_gharar/48924 · this entry19 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC@khane_madahi_ir/1425519 Aug 2026, 06:09 UTC0.97under a minute
@Heyate_gharar/49207 · this entry24 Aug 2026, 06:22 UTC@khane_madahi_ir/1445524 Aug 2026, 06:22 UTC0.97under a minute
@Heyate_gharar/49303 · this entry26 Aug 2026, 07:19 UTC@khane_madahi_ir/1454526 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC0.9632 minutes
@Heyate_gharar/49148 · this entry22 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC@khane_madahi_ir/1440422 Aug 2026, 18:40 UTC0.96under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@khane_madahi_ir14 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.95under a minutethis entry (14–0)
@akhbarefori24 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0015 minutesthis entry (19–5)
@akhbarmashhad10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9837 minutesthis entry (6–4)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 6 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 184 comparable posts for this entry, running 4 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

10,14210,41610,27910,2275 August 202612 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 99 days, net -189. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,101–10,457 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 19:4110,227+19
10 Nov 2026, 13:4610,208+9
9 Nov 2026, 02:0810,199+15
7 Nov 2026, 16:5510,184+5
6 Nov 2026, 13:0110,179-8
5 Nov 2026, 15:1610,187-5
4 Nov 2026, 18:1710,192-5
3 Nov 2026, 20:1710,197+1
2 Nov 2026, 20:5910,196-2
1 Nov 2026, 18:1910,198+3
31 Oct 2026, 20:4710,195-3
30 Oct 2026, 22:0610,198-2
29 Oct 2026, 21:4010,200-1
28 Oct 2026, 21:3910,201-1
27 Oct 2026, 22:1910,202+3
26 Oct 2026, 19:1710,199-5
25 Oct 2026, 22:0010,204+6
24 Oct 2026, 19:4010,198+45
23 Oct 2026, 18:5610,153+7
22 Oct 2026, 19:3910,146first reading

Engagement

399 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 399 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 13m
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 205 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

515 reactions across 234 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤45388.0%
❤‍🔥265.05%
😢122.33%
😭91.75%
💔61.17%
🙏40.777%
🥰30.583%
👍10.194%
👏10.194%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 255 of the 399 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 570 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 399 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 16:41 UTC32 viewsread 29 August 2026

✨ژان ژاک روسو (فیلسوف، نویسنده و آهنگساز اروپایی): ▫️اگر کسانی که با محمّد(ص) مخالفند محمّد(ص) را ببینند در مقابلش سجده کرده و خواهند گفت: ای پیامبر خدا! دست ما را هم بگیر و به آن مقام شامخ و پرافتخار برسان و از نابودی و خطر دور کن ما هم در راه تو قرار داریم و دوست داریم در این راه یا بمیریم یا پیروز شویم .. @Heyate_gharar

29 Aug 2026, 15:09 UTC88 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

✨پیامبر اکرم(ص) چه کسانی را از رحمت الهی دور دانستند؟ @Heyate_gharar

❤2

29 Aug 2026, 14:35 UTC112 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
File

✨“تفسیر ساده قران کریم” ▫️ سوره النَّبَأِ تفسیر آیات : لَا يَذُوقُونَ فِيهَا بَرْدًا وَلَا شَرَابًا/ إِلَّا حَمِيمًا وَغَسَّاقًا/ ( جلسه دهم ) #تفسیر_قرآن @Heyate_gharar

❤1

29 Aug 2026, 13:41 UTC104 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @gharar_eghdamatPhoto

💫 روایت دل‌های هم‌قدم 💫 ✨ وقتی دل‌ها برای یک نیت خیر کنار هم قرار می‌گیرند، هر قدم می‌تواند بخشی از یک اتفاق بزرگ‌تر باشد. 🌱 #هیات_قرار با همراهی شما مردم عزیز، هر روز با نذر و قربانی و توزیع گوشت قربانی، در مسیر حمایت از خانواده‌های حائز صلاحیت، این هم‌قدمی را ادامه می‌دهد. گزارش اقدامات هیئت قرار را در کانال زیر ببینید👇🏻 @Heyate_gharar شما نیز میتوانید در این کار خیر سهیم باشید 👇🏻 5029087002135690

❤1

29 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTC106 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026

✨عظمت نام محمد(ص) ▫️جلوه نام محمد(ص) برای امام صادق(ع) به گونه‌ای بود که هر گاه‌نام مبارک حضرت محمد(ص) به میان می‌آمد، عظمت و کمال رسول‌خدا(ص) چنان در وی تاثیر می‌گذاشت، که رنگ چهره‌اش گاهی سبز وگاهی زرد می‌شد، به طوری که آن حضرت در آن حال، برای دوستان نیزنا آشنا می‌نمود. (۹) امام صادق(ع) گاهی بعد از شنیدن نام پیامبر(ص) می‌فرمود: جانم‌به فدایش. اباهارون می‌گوید: روزی به حضور امام صادق(ع) شرفیاب‌شدم. آن حضرت فرمود: …

❤4

29 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC113 views4 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

✨ محمد صلی‌الله‌علیه‌و‌آله‌وسلم پدر هیچ‌کدام از مردان شما نیست. از رسول خدا و خاتمِ پیامبران است؛ و خداوند به هر چیزی آگاه است. 📖سورهٔ احزاب، آیه ۴۰ @Heyate_gharar

❤4

29 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC≈23,500 views5 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

💚 #استوری کلیپ های ولادت پیامبر اکرم (ص) و امام جعفر صادق (ع) ✨از عرش پیام سرمدی آوردند بـه بـه چـه مه زبانزدی آوردند در روز ولادت امام صادق یک دسته گل محمدی آوردند @Heyate_gharar

❤3❤‍🔥2

28 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC21 viewsread 29 August 2026
File

▫️فایل pdf #متن_زیارت_عاشورا همراه با ترجمه @Heyate_gharar

28 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC24 viewsread 29 August 2026
File

▫️صوت #زیارت_عاشورا 🎙#علی_فانی @Heyate_gharar

28 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC123 views1 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

✨ #پک_استوری ویژه میلاد پیامبر اکرم (ص)و امام جعفر صادق (ع) برسد به گوش جهانیان؛ دو جهان به نام محمد است میلاد #پیامبر (ص) میلاد #امام_جعفر_صادق(ع) @Heyate_gharar

❤1

28 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC115 views2 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

✨ محمد ﷺ رحمتِ عالمیان ... میلاد #پیامبر (ص) میلاد #امام_جعفر_صادق(ع) #پروفایل @Heyate_gharar

❤‍🔥2

28 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC50 views4 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

✨السَّلامُ عَلَيْكَ يَا حُجَّةَ اللَّهِ فِي أَرْضِهِ السَّلامُ عَلَيْكَ يَا عَيْنَ اللَّهِ فِي خَلْقِهِ السَّلامُ عَلَيْكَ يَا نُورَاللَّهِ الَّذِي يَهْتَدِي بِهِ الْمُهْتَدُونَ #جمعه_های_دلتنگی @Heyate_gharar

❤3❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 399 posts we hold for @Heyate_gharar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

| رادیو شعر 📻 |
@RadiooShear · 24,924
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“هیئت قرار” (@Heyate_gharar), 10,227 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Heyate_gharar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.