来咯来咯

Channel
大黑塔的奇物展
@HertaLoveQOS
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
518subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003360356330 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HertaLoveQOS |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HertaLoveQOS |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:58 | 518 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 514 | +7 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 507 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 506 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:03 | 506 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2.98%
- avg views ÷ 518 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 15.4
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (7 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 262 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 04:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 34m 04s
- Average length
- 4m 52s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
充分认清自己,废物 🎀nelo🎀 (@@SHLEBITCH) ——————————————————
有人说“判断女人喜不喜欢你 就看她能不能和你舌吻” 我和情人见面亲 吃饭亲 走路亲 做爱亲 所以老公请放心!我们有好好培养感情哦 我们单独在一块的时候就像真正的情侣 到这个阶段你一定也很开心吧💗 亲手送来的好兄弟夺走了属于你的一切 你还硬着鸡巴磕头跪谢我们的压榨 不用谢哦老公~好日子还长着呢 饭饭🍚QueenNTR (@@FanQueenNTR) ——————————————————
一步到胃🥰🥵💦 #三个橙子酱 (@@SGCZJ1) ——————————————————
#色图 #巨乳 #亚子 #碧蓝档案
#色图 #JK #黑丝 #媚黑 #qos #cosplay #普拉娜 #碧蓝档案
一边摇婴儿铃铛一边用脚哄宝宝射精,但是如果真射了萝莉妈妈就要去出轨给宝宝戴绿帽了♥️
足控绿王八最爱的脚底视角💚 老公说情人把掉出来的肉棒重新插回去的那一刻太涩了~但我觉得视频末尾他射的时候把我整个人顶起来的瞬间也很不错! 你们觉得捏? 🔗 饭饭🍚QueenNTR (@@FanQueenNTR) ——————————————————
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
via: CresCent
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @HertaLoveQOS. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“大黑塔的奇物展” (@HertaLoveQOS), 518 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HertaLoveQOS.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.