Channel
@Helheiim
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002770721987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Helheiim |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 25 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Helheiim |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:51 | 3 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 25 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
#WordsOfAffirmation; @Tetsurow. It’s strange how just a few days could leave something so lasting. You were gentle in a way that felt rare, the kind of softness that doesn’t ask for attention but stays with you long after. You cared in the small ways that matter, and it made me see you as someone deeply unforgettable. I remember you once mentioned you don’t have many friends, and it lingers with me. I worry sometime…
@Tetsurow
@Tetsurow
Aku suka @ kamu knoknox. Kamu pasti sering nt sampe yearning gitu xixi bercanda ya. MAKANYA JANGAN BEGADANG!! Sana obob hush hush ni buka buat kinci imut 🌷 you're doing great today, even if it doesn't feel like it mwehehe. Stay safe ya knox, nom nom nya jangan lupa
༊⊹˚ — @zYearn as kelinci nyimut! ! 😊 kinci bunny imup banget. Karna I think you're very sensitive but very sweet. You're kind to everyone, and your love language is physical touch. But when someone hurts you, you always forgive them.
ShittyRue.: welcome to rp negri baby *bitch
@waaist & @Suamirhyss @Petoer @zYearn. gaylord semua
Photo, posted without a caption
Soren. read the whisper
https://open.spotify.com/track/0BxE4FqsDD1Ot4YuBXwAPp?si=eC_ESPRVSLmtrVb3c94BIQ
FOR TELEGRAM.DOG/ZYEARN. FIRST IMPRESSION : Percaya atau tidak, awalnya saya kira kamu itu tipe yang jaim, terlihat cuek, agak tertutup, dan sedikit canggung dalam bergaul. Kamu punya aura sok cool yang bikin saya salah paham. Tapi ternyata—seiring waktu—kamu cukup baik juga.. well, at least kadang-kadang. SHORT DESC : Kamu adalah rival saya dalam perebutan posisi last chat di grup. Kita sering saling senggol, salin…
Video message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Helheiim. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Helheiim named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Chronicle capsule.” (@Helheiim), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Helheiim.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.