Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for احادیث

Channel

احادیث

@Hefz_Hadis

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

73subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001451728018
TypeChannel
Username@Hefz_Hadis
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hefz_Hadis

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 30 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7274737 August 2026 — 72 subscribers8 August 2026 — 73 subscribers9 August 2026 — 73 subscribers30 September 2026 — 74 subscribers10 October 2026 — 73 subscribers7 August 202610 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 64 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72–74 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Oct 2026, 07:1573-1
30 Sept 2026, 20:0074+1
9 Aug 2026, 22:0273no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:0273+1
7 Aug 2026, 04:3272first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1957.6%
👏824.2%
👍515.2%
👌13.03%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 01:21 UTC18 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

واسه همین در روایات داریم نعمتی که میاد اگر قدرشو ندونید خداوند از شما میگیرتش و هرگز دیگه بر نمیگرده. 😢 تمام.

👍4👏1

7 Aug 2026, 01:20 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

مثال دیگر: پدر به بچش پول میده، ولی بچه قدر این پولو نمی دونه و همیشه در حال هدر دادن پوله. ✔️من چنین فکر میکنم مولا علی علیه السلام میفرمایند: ای بنده خدا، اگر خداوند به تو نعمتی میدهد ( نیکی میکند) قدر این نعمت را بدان و ناسپاسی مکن چرا که اگر ناسپاسی کنی خداوند نعمت را از تو میگیرد. همانطوری که اگر شما به ناسپاسی نیکی کنی، و قدر نیکی شما رو ندونه، دیگه بهش نیکی نمیکنی برای حفظ این ارزش خدا هم همینطوره.

❤1👏1

7 Aug 2026, 01:16 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

به خاطر این موارد نباید به او نیکی کرد ( لازمش این نیست که به او بدی کنیم ها) حرف روی این است نیکی نکن، نه اینکه بدی بکن. نیکی نکن چونکه👇 ۱_ او قدر نعمت را نمیداند و این نعمت نیکی کردن رو نایده میگیرد و این نادیده گرفتن او باعث از بین رفتن ارزش از ارزش های اسلامی ( نعمت نیکی کردن) میشود. ۲_ نه تنها ارزش عمل شما پایین میاد بلکه او بر کار غلط خودش گستاخ تر میشه. مثال ساده: شما یه مقدار طلا که جایگاهش ویژه هست،…

❤1👏1

7 Aug 2026, 01:13 UTC19 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

۵_ در صورتی که مردد هستیم نمیدانیم تاثیر دارد یا نه موظفم طبق اصل عمل کنیم یعنی نیکی کردن. زمانی از این اصل خارج می شویم بدانیم ۱_ علم پیدا کردیم، با کسب تجربه که این شخص ناسپاس است. ۲_ نیکی به این شخص فایده و اثری ندارد و متنبه نمیشود

❤1👏1

7 Aug 2026, 01:11 UTC18 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

۴_ ما باید طبق اصل و قاعده ( نیکی کردن) عمل کنیم مگر مواردی که علم پیدا کردیم ( با کسب تجربه) این شخص با وجود نیکی، بازم ناسپاسی میکند، در این صورت نباید به او نیکی کرد مثل صفت متواضع بودن که وقتی بفهمیم شخص متکبری که با تواضع ما گستاخ تر میشود، تواضع در مقابل او گناه است.

❤1👍1👏1

7 Aug 2026, 01:10 UTC18 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

1_ قاعده و اصل بر نیکی کردن است مطلقا، مگر اینکه خلافش ثابت شود یعنی اگر برای شما محرز شد، فلان شخص نیکی را نادیده میگرد و ناسپاس میکند، نباید به او نیکی کرد. 2_ سیره رفتاری اهل بیت علیهم السلام از ان جهت که امام معصوم هستند و دارای علم غیب، با ما ممکنه یه جاهایی فرق کند یعنی امام میداند، این شخص با وجود نیکی، اگر چه الان ناسپاس میکند ولی بعدا متنبه میشود، فلذا ممکنه بازم به ان شخص ناسپاس نیکی کند چون بعد او را میبی…

❤1👏1

7 Aug 2026, 01:02 UTC18 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

✔️سوال؟ این همه روایات وجود دارد، از کلام و عمل اهل بیت علیهم السلام که به افراد ناسپاس نیکی میکردند چه میشود؟

❤1👌1👏1

7 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC18 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

#حدیث_دویست_و_پنجاه_و_سوم حضرت علی علیه السلام میفرماید: اِصْطِنَاعُ اَلْكَفُورِ مِنْ أَعْظَمِ اَلْجُرْم بزرگ ترین خطاست نیکی کردن به افراد ناسپاس 📕غررالحکم ج۱۶۵۶

❤2👏1

20 Feb 2026, 09:12 UTCviews —

احادیث pinned «#حدیث_دویست_و_پنجاه_و_دوم "پیامبر أعظم صلوات الله علیه: ما مِن صَدَقةٍ أفضلَ مِن قَولِ الحَقِّ. هیچ صدقه ای، برتر از گفتنِ حق نیست. کنز العمّال: ج ۶ ص ۴۱۵ ح ۱۶۳۲۴، حکمت نامه پیامبر اعظم صلی الله علیه و آله، جلد ۸ صفحه: ۲۴۴"»

20 Feb 2026, 09:12 UTC39 viewsread 9 August 2026

#حدیث_دویست_و_پنجاه_و_دوم "پیامبر أعظم صلوات الله علیه: ما مِن صَدَقةٍ أفضلَ مِن قَولِ الحَقِّ. هیچ صدقه ای، برتر از گفتنِ حق نیست. کنز العمّال: ج ۶ ص ۴۱۵ ح ۱۶۳۲۴، حکمت نامه پیامبر اعظم صلی الله علیه و آله، جلد ۸ صفحه: ۲۴۴"

5 Feb 2026, 08:29 UTCviews —

احادیث pinned «#حدیث_دویست_و_پنجاه_و_یکم الإمامُ زينُ العابدينَ عليه السلام : وَدِدتُ و اللّه ِ أنّي افتَدَيتُ خَصلَتَينِ في الشِّيعَةِ لنا بِبَعْضِ لَحمِ ساعِدي : النَّزَقُ .[النَّزَق : الخِفّة و الطَّيش . (لسان العرب : 10/352).]و قِلَّةُ الكِتمانِ .[الكافي : 2/221/1.]…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Hefz_Hadis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“احادیث” (@Hefz_Hadis), 73 subscribers as measured 10 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hefz_Hadis.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.