Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Геката🍭🍬

@Hecate_003

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

373subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002286387044
TypeChannel
Username@Hecate_003
DescriptionСемья Фантико-Гекатовных 😽🍬
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/Hecate_003

Growth

3733753747 Aug 2026, 14:45 — 375 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:31 — 373 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 06:18 — 373 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 14:458 Aug 2026, 06:18
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 373–375 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 06:18373no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:31373-2
7 Aug 2026, 14:45375first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 16 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
98.7%
avg views ÷ 373 subscribers
Avg views / post
368
1 post measured
Reaction rate
10.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026
Posts held17 (16 February 202622 July 2026)
Views total368
Reactions total39
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
108
Videos
6
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

456 reactions across 16 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 535051117606315416110523.0%
custom 54067787909887901706113.4%
❤‍🔥6113.4%
custom 53752524640207885375512.1%
custom 5265196340832404973306.58%
204.39%
163.51%
💘132.85%
custom 5265036056947886284102.19%
👍91.97%
💋81.75%
custom 521746778231619940971.54%
🍓71.54%
custom 525576630634234182761.32%
🍾61.32%
🤩61.32%
custom 526504136552746428451.10%
🎉40.877%
🔥40.877%
😨40.877%
13 further kinds194.17%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 456reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 16 February 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
429
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 16 we hold a reading for · 38%
Most on one post
199
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Hecate_003. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 February 2026 to 22 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC368 views39 reactions67 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

VOITTO KOTIIN! 🤘 Тру-металлистка на 2 прайме ❤️

❤‍🔥18custom 535051117606315416110custom 54067787909887901705🔥2🍓1🍾1💘1😘1

2 Jul 2026, 13:49 UTC648 views35 reactions20 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Финкс и Наджия в новой анимации 🤩

custom 537525246402078853722👍4custom 535051117606315416142❤‍🔥1💘1🤩1

25 May 2026, 06:34 UTC737 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А вот и второй прайм на Мэнди💗🍬

145🍾5💘1🔥1🤩1😱1custom 53505111760631541611

14 May 2026, 14:40 UTC761 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

6️⃣6️⃣6️⃣

custom 5350511176063154161174👍2💘1🔥1🤩1😨1

8 May 2026, 04:31 UTC682 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот такой скинчик купила🎧

custom 535051117606315416117❤‍🔥31👍1💋1💘1custom 53752524640207885371

23 Apr 2026, 13:10 UTC708 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мой первый второй прайм 🥳🥳🥳 Надеюсь не последний👎

❤‍🔥15custom 53752524640207885378🍓5custom 53505111760631541612👍1💋1💘1

18 Apr 2026, 16:10 UTC629 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

😍😍😍 Ну бт ставлю 100/10 хехе 👍

custom 5375252464020788537133🎉3custom 53505111760631541612custom 54067787909887901702❤‍🔥1💋1💘1

16 Apr 2026, 16:04 UTC493 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🩷🩷🩷

custom 537525246402078853711custom 5350511176063154161421❤‍🔥1💋1custom 52557663063423418271

1 Apr 2026, 07:40 UTC580 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥11🤩3😨3🤬2custom 535051117606315416121💘1🤗1

8 Mar 2026, 13:03 UTC613 views25 reactions199 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Поздравляю всех девушек с 8 Марта! 🌹

custom 540677879098879017012custom 53505111760631541615❤‍🔥3custom 52557663063423418272👍1💘1custom 52651963408324049731

Signed 𝗙anti

28 Feb 2026, 18:26 UTC569 views26 reactions100 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Купили с Fanti гипер набор на Сириуса ❤️ Как вам 100-й боец? 👍

custom 535051117606315416115custom 52557663063423418273❤‍🔥2custom 54067787909887901702💋1💘1😡1custom 52174677823161994091

27 Feb 2026, 18:36 UTC528 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 526519634083240497312custom 52650360569478862844❤‍🔥2🎉1💋1💘1custom 52581639976051377461custom 53505111760631541611

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @Hecate_003. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 574,377 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Геката🍭🍬” (@Hecate_003), 373 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hecate_003.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.