Channel
@Health_with_Evie
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
103subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001943728514 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Health_with_Evie |
| Description | Linked chat: t.me/health_with_evie_chat Linked Group: t.me/Food_Watch |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Health_with_Evie |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 103 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 103 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
11 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 54.5% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 27.3% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 9.09% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2025 to 11 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The truth about blood pressure Did you know that in the 1970s, doctors said your BP was fine if it was simply your age + 100? For example, if you were 60, a systolic pressure of 160 was considered normal. Systolic measures the pressure during the heart's contraction, while diastolic is the pressure in the period between heartbeats. Then studies came out pushing the "perfect blood pressure" down to 120/80 which so…
❤1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Heads up On 13th December 2026 synthetic folic acid is to be added to all non wholewheat flour in the UK. EVEN ORGANIC Synthetic folic acid messes up folate metabolism. Dr Clare Craig has stated that there has been only one trial in low risk healthy people and there were 9 fetal deaths for every neural tube defect prevented. She says at every stage of follow up the children died more in the treatment group Synthet…
👍1
In my talk last Monday, I've briefly mentioned the issue of spraying the sky with the intention to 'save us from global warming'. This has a major impact on our health: a) because it reduces the intensity of sunshine we get (by up to 40% according to some researchers) and b) contaminating the air we breath, the soil where our food grows and the water we drink. So, finally, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (E…
👍1
A very interesting new research about the link between where you live and your food health... https://www.naturalhealth365.com/restaurant-menus-are-weaponized-against-your-health-mit-scientists-reveal.html
💯1
Part 2 of the series "What the NHS doesn't tell you" on Monday 14 July 2025 at the canalside venue in Hackney Wick. This time, Katrina Patterson will talk about NATURAL EYESIGHT IMPROVEMENT and explain how there is always something that can be done to improve and protect your precious vision, whether you wear glasses or not. She will also teach a few useful exercises that you can take away to start exploring your ex…
👍1🔥1
DIRTY DOZEN 2025 This list is made each year by the US Environmental Working Group (EWG) using government testing data. The purpose of the list is to help people choose wisely and buy organic where possible, not to avoid eating fruits and vegetables. Blackberries were added to the list this year while potatoes returned because of a chemical used to stop sprouting, called chlorpropham. Many items on the list had sev…
CLEAN 15 - 2025 The EWG also released a “Clean Fifteen” list. These are not totally pesticide-free but were found to have the lowest pesticide residues. 1. pineapple 2. sweetcorn (fresh & frozen) 3. avocados 4. papaya 5. onions 6. sweat peas (frozen) 7. asparagus 8. cabbage 9. watermelon 10. cauliflower 11. bananas 12. mangoes 13. carrots 14. mushrooms 15. kiwi You can find the full article here. 🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸 htt…
👍2
https://solarireport.substack.com/p/concerns-regarding-nanoparticles
👇 THE BEST MEDICINE? Laugh until you cry! 😂
“When you have the chance to laugh out loud, do it until you cry. The days in which you truly laughed will colour your future memories with life." ~ Anton Vanligt I wish I remembered every detail of my life, but I don’t, I remember it in broad strokes sprinkled with meaningful events, however I remember every instance when I laughed until I cried. I remember where I was, who I was with and why we were laughing. I w…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Health_with_Evie. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Health with Evie 🔸 "Best medicine is the one you don't need!" 🔸” (@Health_with_Evie), 103 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Health_with_Evie.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.