25 measurements spanning 28 days, net +75. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,702–11,835 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 15:00
11,817
-3
3 Sept 2026, 00:34
11,820
+1
1 Sept 2026, 20:44
11,819
+3
31 Aug 2026, 22:08
11,816
+22
30 Aug 2026, 19:13
11,794
-2
29 Aug 2026, 15:42
11,796
+2
28 Aug 2026, 13:32
11,794
+11
27 Aug 2026, 16:42
11,783
+19
26 Aug 2026, 14:18
11,764
+20
25 Aug 2026, 11:12
11,744
+6
24 Aug 2026, 11:37
11,738
-11
22 Aug 2026, 20:35
11,749
-6
20 Aug 2026, 08:25
11,755
-5
19 Aug 2026, 06:28
11,760
+10
18 Aug 2026, 09:42
11,750
+6
17 Aug 2026, 10:05
11,744
+2
15 Aug 2026, 19:18
11,742
+3
14 Aug 2026, 08:38
11,739
+14
12 Aug 2026, 23:55
11,725
+3
11 Aug 2026, 23:12
11,722
first reading
Engagement
129 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.68%
avg views ÷ 11,817 subscribers
Avg views / post
908
101 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.957%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
101
of 129 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 93 of 101 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
129 (5 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
91,694
Reactions total
815
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 23:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
31s
Average length
8s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,058 reactions across 119 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
644
60.9%
👍
201
19.0%
🔥
114
10.8%
👏
33
3.12%
🥰
12
1.13%
🤣
11
1.04%
custom 5262958718705750417
7
0.662%
😁
7
0.662%
🤝
6
0.567%
✍
5
0.473%
🤔
4
0.378%
🆒
2
0.189%
👾
2
0.189%
🙈
2
0.189%
❤🔥
1
0.095%
🏆
1
0.095%
👨💻
1
0.095%
💯
1
0.095%
😈
1
0.095%
🤗
1
0.095%
2 further kinds
2
0.189%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 120 of the 129 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,058 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 129 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⭐️ From $100 to $14,962,008,369 — The Incredible Story of Nathanie from Ghana ⭐️
Meet Nathanie, a talented trader from Ghana who just secured 1st place in our Trade Smart Demo contest! His journey? Absolutely mind-blowing. Starting with just $100, he managed to grow his balance to an incredible $14,962,008,369.98! 🚀
Nathanie has been trading since 2020 and joined Headway in late July 2026. When asked about the cont…
🚨 Market View: Escalating tensions have renewed concerns surrounding the Strait of Hormuz, with gold, the euro and Bitcoin losing ground.🚨
💵USD
The US dollar rose towards its 3-week highs as the Middle East conflict rages on.
🥇 XAUUSD
Conversely, gold hit over 3-week low as the MidEast tensions lifted up oil and USD.
🇪🇺 EURUSD
EURUSD has declined towards 1.15760, losing 0.3% as the broader risk sentiment deteriora…
📊📉PRECIOUS METALS UNDER SELLING PRESSURE 💥
🔥Gold, silver and platinum are extending their declines as the US dollar gains strength. The broad sell-off across the metals suggests that stronger USD momentum is outweighing safe-haven demand, as the risk-off sentiment continues to intensify.
👉Momentum is building. Catch the move.
Trade XAUUSD with Headway
🎬 EPISODE 1 IS HERE 🎬
We're officially kicking off Podcast with Headway — and we're starting strong 🔥
In our very first episode, host Collins Akinola sits down with market analyst Abraham Nse to tackle a question every trader has asked themselves: Is risk management just an excuse traders use when they can't make money?
In this episode you'll learn:
🎯 Is risk management just an excuse?
🌊 How do I know a good marke…
Can you predict the NFP? 💸
We all trade the news, but now it’s time to predict it!
Drop your forecast for August NFP number (Nonfarm Payrolls – total new jobs) in the comments below!
The closest guess wins $25 to their Headway trading account!
📆 NFP release: September 4 at 15:30 MT time
⌛️ Deadline to enter: September 4 at 15:00 MT time
📣 Winner announced: September 7
Important rules:
🔹Only one entry per person is…
📊📉US STOCK SELL-OFF CONTINUES💥
🔥The selling pressure across US equities shows no sign of easing, as investors continue to reduce risk exposure. With uncertainty dominating sentiment, volatility could remain elevated across the major indices.
👉The sell-off is not over. Trade the volatility.
Trade US500 with Headway
💴⛓️💥🛎⛓️🖋
New month, new opportunities: September is here! 🎯
Your biggest dream could be next in line to come true! 💫
Ready to join our September Dreamway contest? Here is how to enter:
1️⃣ Drop a comment under this Facebook post sharing the dream you want us to fulfill 💬
2️⃣ Share this post publicly on your Facebook timeline.
3️⃣ We will select one lucky winner and bring their dream to life! ✨
📆 You have until …
🚨 Market View: Attention is now shifting back towards economic data, with Friday’s NFP report taking center stage.🚨
💵USD
The US dollar enters September from a stronger fundamental position than it did in August, but its next move will depend on the NFP data due this Friday.
🥇 XAUUSD
Gold approached September falling below $4,400, triggered by more than a 3% decline in late August.
🇪🇺 EURUSD
The eurozone backdrop s…
📉🥇GOLD UNDER PRESSURE AS THE "RISK-OFF" SENTIMENT SURGES 💥
🔥The risk-off sentiment has strengthened sharply across the markets following Warsh’s hawkish remarks. Expectations of a Federal Reserve rate increase this year rose significantly on Friday and continue to build today.
👉XAUUSD is moving. Trade the volatility.
Trade XAUUSD with Headway
🚨 Market View: Friday’s address by Kevin Warsh at Jackson Hole predictably elevated the volatility and left investors with plenty to digest over the weekend.🚨
💵USD
The US dollar advanced by approximately 0.5%, while expectations of a September rate hike rose sharply.
🥇 XAUUSD
Gold was among the main “beneficiaries” of the interest-rate shift expectations, falling towards $4,480, a decline of approximately 2.6% from…
❤8🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 129 posts we hold for @Headway_world. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@Headway_world edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
AMarkets - Trading Ideas @AMarkets_en · 28,921 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 September 2026
FBS Analytics @fbsanalytics · 87,122 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 17 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Headway” (@Headway_world), 11,817 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Headway_world.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.