Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

༺𝑸𝒖𝒊𝒆𝒕 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒔༻

@HazedreamTGK

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

75subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002245616953
TypeChannel
Username@HazedreamTGK
Description»»——⍟——«« 𝔖𝔱𝔞𝔯𝔡𝔲𝔰𝔱 𝔞𝔫𝔡 𝔱𝔥𝔢 𝔢𝔠𝔥𝔬𝔢𝔰 𝔬𝔣 𝔡𝔢𝔞𝔡 𝔯𝔬𝔬𝔱𝔰 𝔬𝔣 𝔡𝔯𝛾 𝔱𝔯𝔢𝔢𝔰 𝔴𝔦𝔩𝔩 𝔤𝔲𝔦𝔡𝔢 𝛾𝔬𝔲 𝔠𝔬𝔯𝔯𝔢𝔠𝔱𝔩𝛾, 𝔱𝔯𝔞𝔳𝔢𝔩𝔢𝔯 . . . ✭・𝓣𝓱𝓪𝓷𝓴 𝔂𝓸𝓾 𝓯𝓸𝓻 𝓬𝓱𝓸𝓸𝓼𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓶𝔂 𝓹𝓪𝓰𝓮!
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/HazedreamTGK

Growth

7510 Aug 2026, 13:46 — 75 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 14:00 — 75 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 13:4610 Aug 2026, 14:00
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74–76 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 14:0075no change
10 Aug 2026, 13:4675first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 23 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
94.0%
avg views ÷ 75 subscribers
Avg views / post
70.5
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.9%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held8 (23 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total564
Reactions total135
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
171
Videos
7
Links
37

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

135 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53053437967398542074734.8%
custom 51997212136723167062417.8%
custom 53798452013994141861813.3%
custom 53032445885242635611511.1%
custom 5422687976918372478118.15%
custom 533955282900041761385.93%
custom 533053716436513107364.44%
custom 536644581396894365164.44%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 135reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 8 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HazedreamTGK. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC30 views26 reactions5 Starsread 10 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 519972121367231670614custom 53798452013994141865custom 53053437967398542072custom 53395528290004176132custom 53032445885242635611custom 53664458139689436511custom 54226879769183724781

Signed ִֶָ☾. 𝑯𝒂𝒛𝒆𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎 𓏲ּ𝄢

3 Aug 2026, 09:56 UTC59 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Недавно заказала две прекрасные коммишки с Винни. Мне очень нравятся оба рисунка, моя любимая ночная тематика и прелестная девочка в исполнении не менее прелестных подружек ദ്ദി◝ ⩊ ◜.ᐟ Спасибо большое ✿🌷 ✦ Канал автора первого арта https://t.me/uunq3 ✦ Канал автора второго арта https://t.me/maitt33 ⛧ #𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓻 ⛧ #𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓮 ⛧ #𝓦𝓲𝓷𝓷𝓲𝓮 ⛧

custom 53305371643651310734custom 54226879769183724782custom 53053437967398542071custom 53798452013994141861

Signed ִֶָ☾. 𝑯𝒂𝒛𝒆𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎 𓏲ּ𝄢

2 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC52 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Артфайт подходит к концу, а это значит, что пришло время говорить «спасибо»!! ٩(ˊᗜˋ*)و ✿ Я хочу поблагодарить всех за это время. К сожалению, именно этот июль я не могла рисовать и у меня было очень много дел, но, несмотря на это, я изо всех сил пыталась сделать как можно больше атак. Да, не все мои друзья получили от меня арты в этом году, но, пожалуйста, не обижайтесь— я помню всех, кому была должна. Я обещаю, что

custom 53053437967398542077custom 51997212136723167064custom 53032445885242635612custom 53798452013994141861

Signed ִֶָ☾. 𝑯𝒂𝒛𝒆𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎 𓏲ּ𝄢

29 Jul 2026, 21:15 UTC77 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

𝐀𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐬𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐧 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐞𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐭 «𝒜𝓃𝓃𝑜𝓎𝒾𝓃𝑔 𝒷𝓊𝓉𝓉𝑒𝓇𝒻𝓁𝒾𝑒𝓈», «𝒮𝓅𝒶𝒸𝑒 𝒻𝓊𝓃» ✨ https://artfight.net/~Fire_Paw_130 ✨ https://artfight.net/~Luoshy 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤍🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Сразу две атаки, сделанные за один день!! Одна на Фаерочка— человека, который уже много лет вдохновляет меня, а в особенности — на артфайте своей продуктивностью и вовлеченностью. Вторая атака сделана на рандомного пользователя. Меня зацепили его работы и понравились персонажи 🤍🤍

custom 530534379673985420710custom 53798452013994141865custom 53032445885242635614custom 53395528290004176132custom 53664458139689436512custom 54226879769183724782custom 51997212136723167061

Signed ࣪ ִֶָ☾. 𝑯𝒂𝒛𝒆𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎 𓏲ּ𝄢

28 Jul 2026, 16:19 UTC94 views24 reactions2 Starsread 10 August 2026
Photo

𝐀𝐭𝐭𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐬𝐢𝐱 «𝑆𝑒𝑎 𝑏𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑧𝑒» ✨https://artfight.net/~t_aff_y 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤍🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Немного ленюсь под конец артфайта.. Ну, с кем не бывает, ахах. В любом случае, мне очень понравилось рисовать эту пони. Милый персонаж ٩(ˊᗜˋ*)و ♡ 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 𝑴𝒚 𝑨𝒓𝒕𝒇𝒊𝒈𝒉𝒕🖤 https://artfight.net/~Hazedream ⛧ #𝐀𝐑𝐓𝐅𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 ⛧ #𝐅𝐀𝐍𝐀𝐑𝐓 ⛧ #𝐀𝐑𝐓 ⛧ ✦ Спасибо за звездочки, @s3yart

custom 530534379673985420712custom 51997212136723167065custom 53798452013994141863custom 54226879769183724782custom 53395528290004176131custom 53664458139689436511

Signed ࣪ ִֶָ☾. 𝑯𝒂𝒛𝒆𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎 𓏲ּ𝄢

27 Jul 2026, 23:31 UTC67 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Небольшой скетч в честь 100 подписчиков в инстаграмме .𖥔 ݁ ˖ִ₍^. .^₎⟆ ⛧ #𝐀𝐑𝐓 ⛧

custom 53053437967398542077custom 53032445885242635613custom 53305371643651310732custom 53798452013994141861

Signed ࣪ ִֶָ☾. 𝑯𝒂𝒛𝒆𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎 ⋆˚࿔

27 Jul 2026, 05:28 UTC79 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Мне нарисовали очень милую Хейз в виде поняшки. Для меня млп является приятной ностальгией, так что этот гифт был очень желаем) Кроме того, тот же автор сделал мне артик, второй персонаж на котором ренадлежит @zelivio Спасибо ♡🫂 ⛧ #𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓻 ⛧ #𝓯𝓸𝓻𝓶𝓮 ⛧ #𝓗𝓪𝔃𝓮 ⛧

custom 53053437967398542074custom 53395528290004176133custom 53664458139689436512custom 54226879769183724781

Signed ࣪ ִֶָ☾. 𝑯𝒂𝒛𝒆𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎 ⋆˚࿔

23 Jul 2026, 15:06 UTC106 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Хотите ли видеть процессы? (⁠.⁠⁠❛⁠⁠ᴗ⁠⁠❛⁠.⁠) 🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 ⛧ #𝓪𝓷𝓸𝓽𝓱𝓮𝓻 ⛧ #𝐀𝐑𝐓 ⛧

custom 53032445885242635615custom 53053437967398542074custom 54226879769183724783custom 53798452013994141862

Signed ࣪ ִֶָ☾. 𝑯𝒂𝒛𝒆𝒅𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎 ⋆˚࿔

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @HazedreamTGK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 244,805 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“༺𝑸𝒖𝒊𝒆𝒕 𝒅𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒊𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒔༻” (@HazedreamTGK), 75 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HazedreamTGK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.