Channel
@Haven1Official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,797subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001870279458 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Haven1Official |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Haven1Official |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:27 | 2,797 | -9 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:58 | 2,806 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 2,813 | +4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 2,809 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 2,809 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
171 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 99 | 57.9% | |
| ❤ | 53 | 31.0% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 2.92% | |
| 🙈 | 5 | 2.92% | |
| 🙊 | 3 | 1.75% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.17% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.585% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 0.585% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.585% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.585% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 1 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📰 Scoop from Token2049. Stablecoins are the talk of the town. From FX corridors to DeFi adoption, the conversation keeps circling back to how stable, secure rails reshape the game. On Haven1, that future’s already being built. ⚡️
❤10🤯1😁1😈1
Enjoy some JUICY APYs on hLend 🍹 Not that watered-down DeFi nonsense you’ve been sipping elsewhere. Come get the real yield. 👉https://lend.haven1.org
🔥6❤3
☕ GM, Havenauts. Our mission doesn’t stop while you sleep. Validators are securing, hApps are building, and DeFi is evolving. Are you ready for what’s next on Haven1?
❤15🔥6
We didn’t quite hit our $2M volume target this round but we’re still rewarding our top traders 🏆 Rewards are being distributed, and the leaderboard is live: https://join.haven1.org/hswap2_leaderboard Let’s push harder together in the next competition and unlock the full prize pool 🚀
🔥3❤1
Meet hLend 🚀 Our native money market where you can lend, borrow, and unlock new opportunities in DeFi. Built on AAVE's battle-tested foundation, designed for security, and ready for real-world assets. 👉 Read the full story: https://haven1.org/blog/haven1s-next-leap-in-decentralized-lending
🔥8
🌐 Validator nodes may not make headlines, but they’re the backbone of secure, high-performance blockchain networks. We are proud to have Worldpay as one of Haven1’s institutional validator partners. Read the full article here: https://worldpay.com/en/insights/articles/blockchain-validator-nodes Worldpay explains how validators unlock faster, cheaper, and smarter digital payments in their latest blog.
🔥2🤝1
🚀 hLend is LIVE! Borrow. Earn. Grow. No friction. No compromise. Start lending & borrowing today → https://join.haven1.org/hLend
🔥9
🛸 Doors to hLend are opening soon 🚀 Borrowing and lending but Safer. Smarter. Haven1-ready. The Havenauts are lining up, you don’t want to be last. Exclusive access first ⭐️
🔥8
We’re sitting way under $2M volume… and no $2M = no rewards unlocked.👀 You want the bag? Move faster. Trade harder. hSwap harder. Leaderboard’s live, check where you stand👉 https://join.haven1.org/leaderboard_sept3 Let’s finish this round loud. 🚀
🔥3
If your friends are joining Haven1 through someone else’s link… …they’re earning, you’re not. Do with that info what you will. 👀 🔗 Get your affiliate link: https://portal.haven1.org/referral P.S. Nothing to see here...
🔥3
🚨 The race isn’t over yet! Top traders are climbing fast, but there’s still time to secure your spot on the leaderboard. Every trade counts. Every move matters. Let’s push harder, Havenauts! 🏁💥 🔗 https://join.haven1.org/leadeboard-sept-1
🔥6
🚨 LEADERBOARD CHECK 🚨 Only 4 people qualified for rewards so far. FOUR. Remember, prize pool only unlocks if we hit $2M total volume by the end of the campaign… So it's time to pull the squad in 👯♂️ - Invite your friends to join - Coordinate volume together - Climb the leaderboard as a team - Secure your share of $55K before the clock runs out 📅 Until Sept 8 📊Leaderboard: https://join.haven1.org/hswap-vol2-lead…
🔥6🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Haven1Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 692,958 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Haven1 Official Channel 🧑🚀” (@Haven1Official), 2,797 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Haven1Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.