Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hattric X | هتریک ایکس

Channel

Hattric X | هتریک ایکس

@Hattric_X

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

44,420subscribers

-1,538 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002238490404
TypeChannel
Username@Hattric_X
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hattric_X

Growth

43,51545,95844,736.57 August 2026 — 45,958 subscribers7 August 2026 — 45,939 subscribers8 August 2026 — 45,554 subscribers9 August 2026 — 45,145 subscribers10 August 2026 — 44,797 subscribers11 August 2026 — 44,477 subscribers12 August 2026 — 44,126 subscribers13 August 2026 — 43,881 subscribers15 August 2026 — 43,515 subscribers16 August 2026 — 44,122 subscribers17 August 2026 — 44,420 subscribers44,4207 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -1,538. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 43,149–46,324 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 20:2344,420+298
16 Aug 2026, 16:2344,122+607
15 Aug 2026, 00:0743,515-366
13 Aug 2026, 18:0643,881-245
12 Aug 2026, 20:2744,126-351
11 Aug 2026, 18:5744,477-320
10 Aug 2026, 19:1344,797-348
9 Aug 2026, 18:4245,145-409
8 Aug 2026, 15:4145,554-385
7 Aug 2026, 14:1045,939-19
7 Aug 2026, 13:0145,958first reading

Engagement

262 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 44,420 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,500
262 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.388%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
262
of 262 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 231 of 262 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held262 (6 August 202617 August 2026)
Views total1,177,930
Reactions total4,189
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21m 32s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4,189 reactions across 226 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1,37832.9%
1,21829.1%
🔥4129.84%
💔3849.17%
👎2746.54%
👍2556.09%
😐1754.18%
👏431.03%
❤‍🔥380.907%
😍90.215%
👌20.048%
💯10.024%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 231 of the 262 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,189reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 262 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 11:56 UTC571 views32 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

باشگاه برق شیراز با ارسال نامه‌ای به استقلال خواهان حق رشد سیدحسین حسینی شده ⚽️@Hattric_X

🤣31👍1

17 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC822 views5 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

⚪⚽️📮توییت یه کاربر رئالی درمورد رودری: رودری با ۷۶.۵ میلیون یورو به نظرم یه خرید فوق‌العاده و حتی دزدی محسوب میشه، ولی درباره خود معامله تردیدهایی دارم. به‌خاطر سنش، سابقه مصدومیت‌های اخیرش و مهم‌تر از همه اینکه بارسا از قبل این پست رو خیلی خوب پوشش داده بود. ⚽️@Hattric_X

4🤣1

17 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC≈1,230 views19 reactionsread 17 August 2026

‼️⚽️⚽️ کیران گیل: چلسی برای فروش پدرو نتو به سیتی 120 میلیون یورو میخواد😨😨😨 ⚽️@Hattric_X

🤣181

17 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC≈13,800 views37 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

⚽آرزوی نقل و انتقالاتی هواداران پرسپولیس: امباپه، هالند، مسی و رونالدو رو جذب کنیم. ⚽️@Hattric_X

🤣277🔥2👍1

17 Aug 2026, 07:42 UTC≈1,830 views9 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

⚽⚠️مهران احمدی هافبک‌تهاجمی استقلال تنها غایب این تیم دربازی این هفته با نساجی خواهد بود. ⚽️@Hattric_X

5🤣4

17 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC≈1,690 viewsread 17 August 2026
Photo

Sportnavad➕ | اسپورت نود➕ نبردهای جذاب در فوتبال امروز 🔥 ⚡️ چند دیدار مهم در برنامه امروز؛ از تقابل مدعیانی مثل الهلال و بنفیکا تا بازی‌های نزدیک سری‌آ و لالیگا. کفه شانس روی کاغذ به سود الهلال، بنفیکا و ساسولو سنگین‌تر است، اما چند بازی دیگر می‌توانند کاملاً رقابتی و غیرقابل‌پیش‌بینی باشند. با توجه به اختلاف ضرایب، بازی‌های مدعیان برای انتخاب‌های کم‌ریسک‌تر جذاب‌ترند؛ در مقابل، دیدارهای کرمونزه با سامپدوریا و دپور

17 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC≈1,580 views6 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🚨🚨⚽️⚽️ فابریزیو رومانو: بارسا 60 میلیون یورو ثابت + 6 میلیون یورو پاداش سهل الوصول و 10 میلیون یورو پاداش دشوار به سیتی پرداخت میکنه ⚽️@Hattric_X

🤣5👎1

17 Aug 2026, 06:29 UTC≈14,100 views22 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🚨⚽️⚽️ از خوزه آلوارز: بارسلونا میخواد در ساعات آینده برای جذب گیوکرش از آرسنال اقدام کنه ⚽️@Hattric_X

🔥16🤣6

17 Aug 2026, 06:16 UTC≈1,720 views7 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

⚽️ رومانو: جیانیس کنستانتیلیاس به دورتموند، هیر وی گو! ⚽️@Hattric_X

🤣61

16 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC≈2,120 views41 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🇫🇷 لنس، پاری‌سن‌ژرمن رو شکست داد و قهرمان سوپرکاپ فرانسه شد! ⚽️@Hattric_X

🔥35🤣6

16 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC≈2,780 views25 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🚨🚨⚽️ دیوید اورنشتاین: پکیج انتقال رودری، 76.5 میلیون یورو هست ⚽️@Hattric_X

20🤣5

16 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC≈2,790 views17 reactionsread 17 August 2026

🚨⚽️ لوییس روخو، پعنبر در اخبار بارسا: مبلغ ثابت + متغیر انتقال رودری 75 میلیون یورو هست ⚽️@Hattric_X

🤣125

Showing the 12 most recent of 262 posts we hold for @Hattric_X. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Hattric_X edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 208,561 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hattric X | هتریک ایکس” (@Hattric_X), 44,420 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hattric_X.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.