👀
👨💻2🔥1

Channel
@HattemakernNO
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
295subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002387140436 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HattemakernNO |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HattemakernNO |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 295 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 296 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:27 | 296 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 January 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 56 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
123 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 52 | 42.3% | |
| 👍 | 28 | 22.8% | |
| 🔥 | 13 | 10.6% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 7.32% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 4.88% | |
| 🙏 | 5 | 4.07% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.25% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 1.63% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.63% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 0.813% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.813% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👀
👨💻2🔥1
How is everyone these days? I’m still very busy busy irl. Hope you guys print😁
❤7
Missus in the slopes😂 Feels like crypto these days Have a nice Sunday everyone!
😁5
I also got a new job from March 1st which means i have to focus more on my 9-5 than usual. It's a lot going on in real life as well so my activity here will be sporadic. Although i will continue to share whatever i think is good, and you can share to me too if you like. I appreciate all of you sticking around and those who will continue to. Keep printing frens! Happy weekend to you all
❤6👍5🙏4
GM Been a long while since i did a recap on the plays shared in the channel since last time so here it is. Zeroc: Shared 141k, hit 570k. 4x AIC: Shared at 55k. Hit 132k. 2,5x CF: Shared at 22k. Hit 250k. 11x Luna402: Shared at 46k, hit 70k. Degen: Shared 83k, hit 145k Jeff: Shared 30k, never went higher. CT: Shared at 20k and hit 55k. 2x+ Pumpad: Shared at 173k and hit 608k. 3x+ Starcraft: Shared at 33k and hit 4.3m…
❤4👏4🔥2
G2aXNcUo4rDbYjWpHou44TB4bwvc1qYhFuE4mPPNpump Buying a bag here from an ex Pay AI contributor. Text to hardware tech to build circuit boards/PCBS. Post bond dump and is at 17k rn. GitHub Dev: https://github.com/Mbdulrohim?tab=overview&from=2025-12-01&to=2025-12-31&org=PayAINetwork X: https://x.com/Mbdulrohim Also looks like he has an app on app store already. Could be a banger and can see some x's from here.
❤2👍1
93tpTnsf2gAEYGQEJjS42LCseawf2cHRAPDkq5VwBAGS Gamble here. Dev: https://x.com/AlexFinn Has engaged with crypto in the past and should be a good gamble around 15k. Community is about to form here: https://x.com/i/communities/2020785620390736132
👍1🙏1
GM I'm sharing some privates with this guy right here. Seen how he manages to catch runners early and hold for good gains. Obv an eye for good narratives. Never talked to him in DM's but here is the channel and i recommend you to have a look at it. https://t.me/Bottom_Call Quality over quantity. Have a nice day!
❤5👍3
Words of wisdom from Leo
❤3💯1🤝1😁1
A lot of tourists will leave this space. Keep tabs on the ones who have been around the most.
❤4👍2💯1
AYpQAuniup66Qyj3wFmvY2RUs3BiNTSTmmwrdaPpTRND Hm, apparantly won the first place in trends.fun hackathon. Could be something here at 15k. Dev: https://x.com/beiyue66/status/2015317639242141875 Trends.fun is also pushing this: https://x.com/trendsdotfun/status/2018963234511028269?s=20 Not too familiar with trends.fun but could give some x's with this low mc. Dev is also followed by Solana Lets see.
👍2🔥1
Gm ladies and gents. Firstly I hope you are all doing well. My activity here has been sporadic lately, as im quite busy irl. Appreciate everyone still interested being here! At some point soon imma do a recap of the lates plays I've shared since last recap. Wish you all a great day!
❤5👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HattemakernNO. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The maker of hats; a Crypto diary” (@HattemakernNO), 295 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HattemakernNO.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.