Channel
@HattarJop
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,470subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001893457322 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HattarJop |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 31 August 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HattarJop |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 1,470 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 1,468 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 1,468 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 23 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (23 April 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,057 |
| Reactions total | 21 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 11:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
159 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 116 | 73.0% | |
| ❤ | 34 | 21.4% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 2.52% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.26% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.629% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.629% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.629% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#хаттаранжоп 4492 Жоплушверг: Сайд-Iалий Варандо Хаттаран йоза: Почему Аль Бухари не принял хадисы от человека из-за того, что тот жестоко относился к животным? Ведь даже если жестоко относился, то он мог знать какие-то важные хадисы. И также, если со смерти Пророка и до рождения Аль Бухари прошло около 245 лет, то не могли ли хадисы дойти до Аль Бухари искаженными? Или хадисы записывались еще со времен Пророка? …
👍3
#хаттаранжоп 4491 Жоплушверг: Сайд-Iалий Варандо Хаттаран йоза: Зуда йалийча, цуьнца цхьан кхетча дан дезаш долу суннаташ хаъ лаьар. До1 муьлхарг дан деза? Т1аккха зудчуьнца деш долу суннат ламазах лаьцна а. И ламаз муьлхачу хенахь дича а башхалла йуй? Масалла пхьуьйр ламаз далле хуьлур иза, йа пхьуьйр ламаз динчулт1аьхьа, цуьнца цхьан кхеттачу хенахь дан дези и? Цу ламазехь дешча суннат ду аьлла даьхкина суранаш д…
👍3
🤚 Хьехамаш/Табук тӀехь беш болчу балхахь дакъа лаца луаш велахь: @xexamash_bot. Цхьа а говзаллаш хила еза аьл дац.
👍5
Вай дIадолош керла жайна ду. Дарсийн формат, хьалха санна, иштта хир йу: ⏺ Хlора кlирнах масех дарс кху агlон тlе йуьллур йу; ⏺ Цул тlехьа, схьа иэцна lильма тlе чlагlдархьам, кегий тесташ йохкур йу кху чу; ⏺ Жайнийн чекхенаьхь а экзамен хир йу (сертификат луш). 📖 Жайн: Элчанан ﷺ ламаз даран куц. Iабдул-Iазиз ат-ТIарифи. Аллахlа lильмангахь са дохийла вай 💚 https://t.me/neq_niysa
👍3❤1
#хаттаранжоп 4490 Жоплушверг: Сайд-Iалий Варандо Хаттаран йоза: Хан елчул т1аьхьа, арахь бармал совнах (дижин Адам сам даккхал) г1овг1а ечарна (чам боцш маше хехкар, эшарш лекхитар, велар, герз кхиссар ... кхи д1а) наь1алт ала мегар дуй? Тегш: Г1ов йар,сих машен,наь1алт алар
👍6
#хаттаранжоп 4489 Жоплушверг: Аюб Хаттаран йоза: АллахІан Элчано (ﷺ) аьлла: Динехь тlехбуьйлурш хlаллак хилла Динехь тlехбуьйлурш хІаллак хилла Динехь тІехбуьйлурш хІаллак хилла. (Муслим: 2670) Жим хlокхун масаллех кхетор вари ахь са ваш Тегш: Хьадис, суннат, динахь юкъаралла, динахь тIехбалар Хадис, сунна, золотая середина, крайность в религии
👍7
#хаттаранжоп 4488 Жоплушверг: Аюб Хаттаран йоза: АС-САЛЯМУ ‘АЛЯЙКУМ ВА РАХМАТУ-ЛЛАХИ ВА БАРАКЯТУ Хаттар дар, массала пхьуьр ламаз дин чул тIаьхь Iуьйр ламаз хан хиллац собар дич, ламаз доьх дацахь керла эца ца оьцуш да мегш дуй из? Тегш: Ламаз, ламаз эцар Намаз, омовение
❤2👍2
#хаттаранжоп 4487 Жоплушверг: Аюб Хаттаран йоза: Ассаламу ӏалайкум. Вай ӏадатяхь бершех жимниг хӏусмяхь вуьса шен деци а,ненаци а. И да а,нана а,дӏадаьлча и хӏусамш ерриге цуна йисар шариӏатяхь муха ду ? Кхеча доьзалхошна,хӏумма йогӏи цу кертар ? Тегш: Наследство, младший сын Верасалла, даьхни декъар, доьзал
👍12
#хаттаранжоп 4486 Жоплушверг: Аюб Хаттаран йоза: السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Масалан Ламазехь хьалха вялла имам ву, тӏехь хиттан масех стаг волуш, цунна (имаман) шена тӏехь цхьаъ хотта гӏерташ вуй хии, тӏеххьарлера сужудехь ву иза (имам), я тӏеххьар лера ташаххӏуд доьшуш ву из, и тӏехь хуттуш вериг шена тӏехь хӏотталца, сужудехь цунна собар да йиш йолуш вуй и (сужуд даххо, я ташаххӏуд деш велча и шена тӏехь …
👍6❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
👍15
#хаттаранжоп 4485 Жоплушверг: Сайд-Iалий Варандо Хаттаран йоза: Салам азцана даитан хилча юха лучу хенахь яздина дала мегий Тегш: Салам далар, саламан жоп далар Салям, таслим, ответ на салям
👍10❤1
#хаттаранжоп 4484 Жоплушверг: Аюб Хаттаран йоза: السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته. Арафат дийнахь марх кхабарех лаьц хаттар дар са,и нийс мух кхаб дезаш ду? Цхьа болчара и Арафат хьалхарч дийнахь ша и Арафат дийнахь кхоб аьл хеззер сун,т1аккха ша цу Арафат дийнахь цун т1ехь дог1ч дийнахь кхоб аьл. Нийсо муьлхаг хуль цунах? Заранее БаракаЛлах1у фика. Тегш: Арафат, марх кхабар Пост в Арафат
❤8👍3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @HattarJop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 624,737 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хаттар-жоп” (@HattarJop), 1,470 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HattarJop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.