Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

С Мику в Закулисье

@HatsuneMikuInRealLife

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,299subscribers

+9 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001669916439
TypeChannel
Username@HatsuneMikuInRealLife
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HatsuneMikuInRealLife

Growth

1,2901,2991,294.512 Aug 2026, 14:18 — 1,290 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 15:24 — 1,299 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 14:1812 Aug 2026, 15:24
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,289–1,300 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 15:241,299+9
12 Aug 2026, 14:181,290first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.7%
avg views ÷ 1,299 subscribers
Avg views / post
425
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
10.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held8 (9 August 202612 August 2026)
Views total3,403
Reactions total353
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

353 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 519984298888005085613438.0%
custom 519758339799569214512535.4%
custom 52603214627571206715114.4%
custom 5199643509123992192329.07%
custom 519942996764499958282.27%
custom 519982233438232594830.85%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
21
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 8 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HatsuneMikuInRealLife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 8 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC366 views59 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Проснулись-улыбнулись! 😉

custom 519984298888005085633custom 519758339799569214517custom 52603214627571206718custom 51998223343823259481

11 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC440 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всем спокойной ночи 🤩

custom 519964350912399219227custom 519758339799569214518custom 519984298888005085611custom 52603214627571206712

10 Aug 2026, 05:22 UTC457 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

custom 519984298888005085612custom 51975833979956921455custom 51994299676449995822

10 Aug 2026, 05:19 UTC418 views57 reactions14 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Лаадно, вот вам все фоточки!🤩 Вы хорошие, не так сильно луком бьёте🤩

custom 519758339799569214522custom 526032146275712067121custom 51998429888800508567custom 51996435091239921925custom 51998223343823259482

10 Aug 2026, 05:14 UTC395 views48 reactions7 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Не ожидали? Я тоже! Хотя кому я вру, я всю неделю собиралась фоткаться в мониторинг 🤩 Будут ещё фоточки!

custom 519758339799569214522custom 526032146275712067111custom 51998429888800508569custom 51994299676449995826

9 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC423 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Завтра выложу то, что вам очень понравится! Ждите утро🤨

custom 519984298888005085630custom 519758339799569214513custom 52603214627571206715

9 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC451 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Выбирала все лук, но выбрала черную футболку с чокером!🤩 Этакая панкуха получилась, х) Ну и милая фоточка☺️ (Теперь эта белая футболка моя любимая, да🤩)

custom 519984298888005085626custom 519758339799569214513custom 52603214627571206714

9 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC453 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 519758339799569214515custom 51998429888800508566

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @HatsuneMikuInRealLife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 653,401 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“С Мику в Закулисье” (@HatsuneMikuInRealLife), 1,299 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HatsuneMikuInRealLife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.