Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
2,330 average views per post against 1,150 subscribers — an engagement rate of 202.5%. Across the 1,296 registered channels in the same cohort — 1,000–3,153 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 7.40% and 30.3%, with a median of 16.0%.
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 202.5%
- avg views ÷ 1,150 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,330
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 1.71%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 9
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 19 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
11 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.5% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
18 Sept 2026, 14:50 UTC128 views0 reactionsread 19 September 2026 ⭕️شورش پترودلار علیه والاستریت؛ آیا به پایان نیمقرن تأمین مالی رایگان بدهیهای واشنگتن رسیدهایم؟
🟠تغییر جهت تاریخی پترودلارها
📍فدرال رزرو با اجماع دوازده عضو، نرخ بهره را به ۳.۷۵ تا ۴.۰۰ درصد افزایش داد که نخستین انقباض پولی از سال ۲۰۲۳ است و شاخص دلار را به بالای ۱۰۰ رساند. این تصمیم توالی خروج سرمایه از بازارهای نوظهور را رقم زد؛ بهطوریکه کره جنوبی شاهد خروج ۱۲۷.۰۸ میلیارد دلار سرمایه خارجی در هفت ماه متوالی…
17 Sept 2026, 16:42 UTC≈29,700 viewsread 19 September 2026 ⭕️فرصت بریکس برای توافقی محدود در میانه اختلافها
🟠گزارش اختصاصی «اندیشکدۀ هشت کرانه» از امکان گفتوگوی ایران و امارات
📍دیدار ایران و امارات در حاشیه نشست بریکس در دهلینو را نباید نشانه پایان اختلافهای دو کشور دانست؛ اما میتوان آن را فرصتی برای مدیریت اختلافها تلقی کرد. تهران و ابوظبی برای آغاز یک مسیر گفتوگو، لازم نیست درباره همه مسائل گذشته به توافق برسند. شاید نقطه شروع واقعبینانهتر، توافق بر سر یک موضوع …
16 Sept 2026, 16:48 UTC115 viewsread 19 September 2026 ⭕️جنگ ایران، خلیج فارس را به بازطراحی امنیتی واداشت
🔴شوک امنیتی جدید
📍جنگ ایران معادلات امنیتی کشورهای عربی خلیج فارس را دگرگون کرد و نشان داد اتکا به یک ضامن خارجی برای حفظ ثبات منطقه دیگر کافی نیست. حملات متقابل، افزایش هزینههای بیمه جنگی، آسیب به زیرساختهای انرژی و گسترش ناامنی دریایی، شکنندگی نظم موجود را آشکار کرد. در جریان این بحران، عربستان سعودی، قطر و عمان با اعزام هیئتهایی به مراسم خاکسپاری رهبر ایران،…
15 Sept 2026, 16:15 UTC67 views2 reactionsread 19 September 2026 ⭕️جنگ ایران و آمریکا چگونه نظم خلیج فارس را زیر و رو کرد؟
🔴فرسایش هژمونی
📍شش ماه پس از آغاز جنگ، خلیج فارس وارد مرحلهای تازه شده است؛ مرحلهای که در آن نظم پیشین مبتنی بر برتری آمریکا با چالشهای جدی روبهرو شده و بازیگران منطقهای و فرامنطقهای در حال بازتعریف جایگاه خود هستند. جنگ نتوانست به اهداف اعلامشده واشنگتن و تلآویو، از جمله تغییر حکومت و نابودی توان موشکی و هستهای ایران، دست پیدا کند.
📍در مقابل، ایرا…
👌2
14 Sept 2026, 18:32 UTC39 views2 reactionsread 19 September 2026 Posted without readable text
👍2
12 Sept 2026, 16:42 UTC22 viewsread 19 September 2026 ⭕️چین و امنیت هرمز؛ وقتی عبور نفتکش کافی نیست
🟠گزارش اختصاصی اندیشکدۀ «هشت کرانه» از مناسبات چین و تنگۀ هرمز
📍قطر در شرایط کنونی تنگۀ هرمز فقط به دنبال مشتری برای گاز خود نیست؛ مسئله اصلی این است که آیا میتواند محمولهها را با اطمینان به مقصد برساند یا نه. سفر محمد بن عبدالرحمن آلثانی به پکن هم از همین زاویه اهمیت داشت که چین برای کمکردن ریسک تجارت در هرمز چه میتواند بکند؟
📍خبرگزاری رسمی چین گزارش داد که نخست…
11 Sept 2026, 16:34 UTC22 viewsread 19 September 2026 🔴خروج بیصدا از زیر چتر واشنگتن: بازی بقای کشورهای خلیج فارس روی موشکهای شرقی و یوان چین
📍شعلهور شدن درگیری نظامی میان آمریکا، اسرائیل و ایران، ناکارآمدی ساختار پدافندی واشنگتن را در مهار حملات موشکی و پهپادی به زیرساختهای خلیج فارس آشکار کرده است. این بحران اعتماد، اعضای شورای همکاری خلیج فارس را واداشته تا برای تضمین بقای خود بهسوی قدرتهای غیرغربی گرایش یابند. آنکارا با تکیه بر فناوری پهپادی و صنایع دفاعی پیش…
10 Sept 2026, 16:39 UTC18 viewsread 19 September 2026 ⭕️خلیج فارس در آستانه نظم جدید؛ آیا گفتوگو میتواند جایگزین بحران شود؟
🔴گذار راهبردی
📍منطقه خلیج فارس وارد مرحلهای تازه شده است؛ مرحلهای که در آن توانایی کشورهای خلیج برای حفاظت از جوامع، زیرساختها و اقتصادهای خود در رویدادهای اخیر به نمایش درآمده، اما همزمان محدودیت اتکا صرف به آمادگی نظامی و روابط امنیتی خارجی نیز آشکار شده است. پیشنهاد فرایند مسقط که از ژوئن در چارچوب گروه دوستان این روند مطرح بوده، بر مشار…
9 Sept 2026, 16:42 UTC42 viewsread 19 September 2026 ⭕️آسیب از مبداء؛ معادلۀ جدید آمریکا برای فشار به صادرات نفت ایران
🔴گزارش اختصاصی «هشت کرانه» از وضعیت جنگی جدید میان ایران و آمریکا
📍یکی از سه نفتکشی که به روایت سنتکام آمریکا در ۵ سپتامبر هدف قرار گرفت، خالی بود، اما بخشی از ناوگان ترانزیت سوخت ایران محسوب میشد. اهمیت موضوع در تفاوت میان بستن مسیر تجارت و آسیبزدن به ابزار تجارت است. وقتی محاصره از پیش رفتوآمد را محدود کرده، حمله به نفتکش هزینه دیگری تحمیل میکن…
8 Sept 2026, 17:06 UTC15 viewsread 19 September 2026 🔴نشست «هیلی ۲۰۲۶» در ابوظبی؛ امنیت خلیج فارس، تنگه هرمز، نقش اروپا و چین و آینده شراکتهای راهبردی در کانون گفتوگوها
📍سومین دوره «مجمع هیلی» روزهای ۷ و ۸ سپتامبر ۲۰۲۶ در ابوظبی با شعار «خلیج فارس بر سر دوراهی: مناقشه، پیامدها و اصلاح مسیر» برگزار شد. این نشست در شرایطی برگزار شده که مناقشه آمریکا و اسرائیل با ایران از نظر سیاسی و نظامی حلنشده باقی مانده و تنگه هرمز به یکی از محورهای اصلی رقابت بر سر ساختار امنیتی…
6 Sept 2026, 16:36 UTC19 viewsread 19 September 2026 ⭕️وابستگی شدید اروپا به منابع نفت و گاز کشورهای خلیج فارس و معضلۀ امنیت برونسپاری به آمریکا
🔴سراب تنوعبخشی انرژی
📍استراتژی شتابزده اتحادیه اروپا برای فرار از تله ژئوپلیتیک مسکو، اکنون قاره سبز را در قلب بحرانی مرگبارتر در خاورمیانه گرفتار کرده است. پیش از آغاز جنگ اوکراین در سال ۲۰۲۲، ساختار اقتصادی اروپا وابستگی فلجکنندهای به روسیه داشت؛ تامین ۱۶.۵ درصد از واردات نفت خام و نزدیک به ۵۰ درصد از گاز طبیعی به مس…
5 Sept 2026, 16:51 UTC69 viewsread 19 September 2026 دو الگوی همکاری هستهای آمریکا در خلیج فارس
🔸 وقتی آمریکا و امارات در سال ۲۰۰۹ توافق همکاری هستهای امضا کردند، ابوظبی پذیرفت از غنیسازی و بازفرآوری در داخل کشور صرفنظر کند. هفده سال بعد، در توافقی که با عربستان شکل گرفته، چنین تعهدی از ریاض گرفته نشده است. حتی مسیری باز گذاشته شده که در صورت موافقت بعدی آمریکا، بتوان درباره ایجاد ظرفیت غنیسازی در عربستان بررسی و مذاکره کرد.
🔸 در مدل امارات، منطق روشن بود؛ برای …
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @Hashtkarane. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اندیشکده هشت کرانه” (@Hashtkarane), 1,150 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hashtkarane.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.