Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for هارمی توییت

Channel

هارمی توییت

@Harmy_TW

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

9,483subscribers

-231 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002477941932
TypeChannel
Username@Harmy_TW
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Harmy_TW

Growth

9,4839,7149,598.57 August 2026 — 9,714 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,714 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,703 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,682 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,662 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,640 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,597 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,557 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,520 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,483 subscribers7 August 202631 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net -231. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,448–9,749 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 01:399,483-37
27 Aug 2026, 18:579,520-37
24 Aug 2026, 17:369,557-40
20 Aug 2026, 18:389,597-43
17 Aug 2026, 10:079,640-22
14 Aug 2026, 01:059,662-20
11 Aug 2026, 03:419,682-21
8 Aug 2026, 11:259,703-11
7 Aug 2026, 18:459,714no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:359,714first reading

Engagement

108 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.5%
avg views ÷ 9,483 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,790
108 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
108
of 108 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 103 of 108 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held108 (5 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total301,726
Reactions total45,616
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 06:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16m 35s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 34 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

45,616 reactions across 103 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😭14,06630.8%
❤‍🔥6,24313.7%
🔥5,75512.6%
👍5,59012.3%
💋5,58612.2%
🤣5,32711.7%
💘1,7063.74%
💔4681.03%
🤯4040.886%
🤝3110.682%
👎330.072%
💯330.072%
🍓310.068%
😨280.061%
👌120.026%
💅100.022%
😘100.022%
🤓30.007%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 103 of the 108 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45,616 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 108 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Harmy_TW. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 108 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC≈1,420 views117 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

پاشید ملکه ها با همه‌ی ایمیل هاتون میتونید به بی‌تی‌اس ۲۰ تا رای بدین💋 https://vote.mtv.com/?category=auth https://vote.mtv.com/?category=auth شات رای هاتونو زیر پست بفرستید ❤️‍🔥 اگه کسی بلد نیست رای بده توی کامنتا بگه کمکش میکنم

🔥117

28 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC≈2,100 views432 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ویمین؟؟!! این تو کره فقط یه معنی میده😭

😭400🔥26❤‍🔥6

28 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC≈2,120 views338 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

تاریخ سازی‌های بنگتن پارت nام!🔥 بنگتن به اولین گروه و در مجموع سومین اکت تاریخ در کنار Beyoncé و Bad Bunny تبدیل شد که در چارت Top Tours برای چندین ماه مختلف از 100 میلیون دلار درآمد عبور کردن❤️‍🔥 همچنین تور ARIRANG رسما به پرفروش‌ترین تور تاریخ بین تمام گروه‌های وکال و آرتیست‌های کیپاپ تبدیل شد. این تور تا الان از ۴۳۳.۲ میلیون دلار درآمد داشته و طی ۳۸ کنسرت، ۲.۳ میلیون بلیت فروخته؛ اونم در حالی که تمام اجراها کامل

🔥321❤‍🔥14👍2😭1

Signed Luna⁷ ⊙⊝⊜

28 Aug 2026, 10:40 UTC≈2,200 views471 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

ملکه اسلی کرد🔥 “BTS KINGS OF (K-POP❌) MUSIC”

🔥459💋11🤣1

Signed Luna⁷ ⊙⊝⊜

26 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈2,760 views447 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

دیواکوک 🫦

💋408😭20❤‍🔥9🍓4💅3🤣2🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC≈2,750 views319 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

nct (wish) to be BTS nct (dream) to be BTS nct (u) will never be BTS

❤‍🔥286😭19💯8👍3🤣3

Signed Luna⁷ ⊙⊝⊜

26 Aug 2026, 15:33 UTC≈2,710 views324 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

اس‌ام بس کن! بنگتن داستان و المان‌های فیلم Oldboy رو وارد MV کردن؛ حالا SM هم اومده بعد ۵ ماه داره یه MV به اسم Oldboy منتشر می‌کنه که هیچ ارتباطی با آهنگ نداره!! انگار هر چیزی که بنگتن تبدیل به یه پروژه‌ی خلاقانه و خاص می‌کنه، از ایده و کانسپت گرفته تا سال‌ها تلاش برای پیدا کردن «BTS بعدی»؛ همیشه دلش می‌خواد یه شاهکار مثل BTS بده بیرون ولی خب درنهایت یه نسخه‌ی کپی و ارزونی بیش نیستن. درسته که بنگتن همیشه الهام‌بخش

🔥291👍22😭7🤣3💯1

Signed Luna⁷ ⊙⊝⊜

26 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈2,910 views726 reactions1 Starread 29 August 2026
Photo

میتونم براشون بمیرم😭

💋652😭54💘11❤‍🔥4🤣3🍓2

25 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC≈2,990 views394 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

«هیچ‌وقت خود واقعیت رو گم نکن، بدون کی هستی و چی هستی» این یه موضوع عمیقه؛ و پسرا واقعا مفهومش رو درک کردن.

❤‍🔥379💋9😭4🍓2

25 Aug 2026, 19:12 UTC≈3,150 views505 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

میمیرم براشون خیلی نازن😭🤏 تهیونگ برا هر عکسی کپشن زده برای عکس خودش : اینو اول از همه گرفتم جین : این وحشیه هیچوقت تحریکش نکنید اونوقت زیادی حرف میزنه نامجون : این عکس گرفتنش برام آسون نبود جونگکوک : اگه زیاد نزدیکش بشید احتمال میدم گازتون بگیره جیهوپ : ولی این یکی آروم‌تر و حرف‌شنوتره

😭492💋10❤‍🔥3

25 Aug 2026, 12:43 UTC≈3,190 views449 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

شبکه‌ی خبری کانادایی CP24 در گفت‌وگویی با اریک آلپر، کارشناس موسیقی کانادایی، درباره‌ی بزرگی و جایگاه جهانی BTS پرداخت‌ 🇨🇦💜 همچنین آلپر بنگتن رو در سطح گروه‌هایی مثل رولینگ استونز و بیتلز قرار داد و درباره‌ی بزرگی فندوم و تاثیر جهانی‌ اون صحبت کرد و همچنین گفت: «این گرمی‌ها هستن که به BTS نیاز دارن، نه BTS به گرمی‌ها.»

🔥421❤‍🔥25🤣3

Signed Luna⁷ ⊙⊝⊜

25 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC≈3,220 views522 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

و لازمه بگم بجای چنگ زدن به کیر جونگکوک بهتره نگران این باشی بلینک 🗣

🤣504👎11👌4😭3

Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @Harmy_TW. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 937,264 of 1,629,372 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“هارمی توییت” (@Harmy_TW), 9,483 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Harmy_TW.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.