Pump bullish, If btc stays up, We will go 0.003++++ anytime soon
👏3
Signed 🧠 Harison

Channel
@HarisonsCalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,333subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001953833207 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HarisonsCalls |
| Created | Between 1 March 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HarisonsCalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 1,333 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:32 | 1,332 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:23 | 1,332 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 11 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (6 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,453 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
16 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 6 | 37.5% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 31.3% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Pump bullish, If btc stays up, We will go 0.003++++ anytime soon
👏3
Signed 🧠 Harison
Im looking to buy $PUMP token, I do hold few also but im seeing more noises in the market about PUMP token, ALso they are so undervalued imo. Will be buying soon. Its now little expensive also trading near a good resistance zone. So a drop should come. Lets seee
😁2
Signed 🧠 Harison
nigga holds 0.0016 personal btc , what he will do by selling it
❤1
Signed 🧠 Harison
JUST IN: Michael Saylor says he "never sold" his personal Bitcoin. "Strategy is a public company, not my wallet." @WatcherGuru
Signed 🧠 Harison
Good luck
Signed 🧠 Harison
JUST IN: Michael Saylor's Strategy authorizes plans to sell up to $5 billion in Bitcoin. @WatcherGuru
Signed 🧠 Harison
https://x.com/PrintorRekt/status/2082102799329075626?s=20 spx dump will bring btc down heavy imo
Signed 🧠 Harison
Those who saying constantly bear market bottom is in, BTC · $64,076.40 will not go below 57k hear me out- If bitcoin print a chart and cross 84k+ and close weekly candle there then another week side ways and come back to 65k to 70k to retest, Your claim is valid no question on this but but if this doesnt happen in june it will never happen in sept aug or october then what btc will do in this month, side ways motion…
Signed 🧠 Harison
People comparing World cup with BTC bottom, What a funny story, 2018 world cup ended july 14th, Bottom found in dec, Then 2022 worldcup ended nov , bottom found nov, But thats not for worldcup because 2021 bull market TOP found at nov too. In this way this cycle bottom will be found during october. Will come to this post later Again thats a time base capitulation theory, If market makers wants they can do price base…
❤1
Signed 🧠 Harison
Trust me this nigga looks so ugly af https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e3KHv0hiNhk
😁3
Signed 🧠 Harison
JUST IN: $100,000,000 worth of crypto shorts liquidated in the past 60 minutes. @WatcherGuru
Signed 🧠 Harison
Nothing new ongoing on $BTC. We just waiting for green close this month and then straight red 2months ore more, Just not making it so complicated. patiently waiting. A realistic take, bottom only comes when there is vol spike on weekly candles. You can check all other bear market bottom, It wont be different this time
Signed 🧠 Harison
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @HarisonsCalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🧠 Harrison's Perps” (@HarisonsCalls), 1,333 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HarisonsCalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.