Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gegham Hakobyan | Գեղամ Հակոբյան

Channel

Gegham Hakobyan | Գեղամ Հակոբյան

@HakobyanGegham

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

81subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002055483576
TypeChannel
Username@HakobyanGegham
DescriptionЭкономист, член Европейской партии Армении Для связи: [email protected]
Created19 April 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/HakobyanGegham

Growth

817 August 2026 — 81 subscribers9 August 2026 — 81 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 80–82 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 18:4681no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:5181first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
68
Videos
7
Links
196

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 90.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍990.0%
👎110.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 January 2026 to 4 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Apr 2026, 00:54 UTC45 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://chatgpt.com/s/m_69d060e424f08191addfb4c744ebb3d0

👍1👎1

1 Apr 2026, 03:28 UTC52 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://gemini.google.com/u/1/app/99a6c884dafe8d42?pageId=none

👍1

31 Mar 2026, 06:06 UTC42 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://gemini.google.com/app/99a6c884dafe8d42%20ICT%2001.04.26

👍1

22 Jan 2026, 01:17 UTC70 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Институты, элиты и путь развития Армении ⸻ 📘 Пост 8 Культура и религия: почему они не приговор для развития (Армения — Израиль — Южная Корея) Очень часто отсталость объясняют культурой, религией или «менталитетом». Это интеллектуально удобно — и стратегически опасно. Исторический опыт Армении, Израиля и Южной Кореи показывает: 👉 религия и культура сами по себе не определяют развитие. Определяют институты, через

👍3

21 Jan 2026, 22:52 UTC42 viewsread 9 August 2026

Миллс — почему они концентрируют власть. Армения же стоит перед выбором: либо оставаться периферийной элитой имперской системы, либо сформировать собственный национально-ориентированный правящий класс.

21 Jan 2026, 22:52 UTC38 viewsread 9 August 2026

Колониально-имперские элиты Армении в свете теории элит (Парето — Моска — Миллс) 1. Теоретическая рамка: элиты неизбежны, но не нейтральны Классическая теория элит, разработанная Вильфредо Парето, Гаэтано Моска и позднее развитая Чарльз Райт Миллс, исходит из принципиального положения: Любое общество управляется меньшинством. Вопрос не в существовании элит, а в том, кому и чему они служат. Эта рамка позволяет ст

21 Jan 2026, 22:15 UTC31 viewsread 9 August 2026

Геополитика с начинкой геоэкономики: почему будущее малых государств решается институтами, технологиями и перекрёстками Современный мировой порядок переживает фазу структурного сдвига. Противостояние государств всё меньше определяется идеологией и всё больше — контролем над потоками: энергии, данных, технологий, товаров и капитала. В этих условиях привычные геополитические объяснения перестают работать без геоэконо

21 Jan 2026, 22:15 UTC22 viewsread 9 August 2026

В эпоху ИИ, ресурсов и перекрёстков выживают не самые сильные, а самые институционально умные.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HakobyanGegham. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,218,109 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gegham Hakobyan | Գեղամ Հակոբյան” (@HakobyanGegham), 81 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HakobyanGegham.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.