Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Hakkerman

@Hakkerman_art

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,324subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002039229879
TypeChannel
Username@Hakkerman_art
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Hakkerman_art

Growth

1,3171,3241,320.56 August 2026 — 1,317 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,317 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,320 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,324 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,316–1,325 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 08:361,324+4
9 Aug 2026, 11:061,320+3
6 Aug 2026, 19:301,317no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:331,317first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.8%
avg views ÷ 1,324 subscribers
Avg views / post
686
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held12 (25 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total8,236
Reactions total787
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 17:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

787 reactions across 12 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
38548.9%
🔥12415.8%
🥰10813.7%
custom 539563687272882467410313.1%
❤‍🔥293.68%
💘202.54%
😢101.27%
🙏30.381%
custom 531678388880934517920.254%
custom 539781458865162165220.254%
🦄10.127%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 787reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 12 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Hakkerman_art. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:17 UTC98 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

8custom 53956368727288246748custom 53167838888093451792

2 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC584 views73 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Последний, завершающий арт на АФ и по совместительству атака Для @PurpleAnxiety и @ZhulyaDragoness ❤️‍🔥 Хочу подвести итоги своей активности. За этот сезон я отрисовала 49 работ и набрала 3233.5 поинтов Атак было очень много в этом году, неожиданно много, НО я героически отбила все 🤩 АФ поднимает мою самооценку и открывает мне глаза на мои возможности. Никогда бы не подумала, что могу выдать 50 артов за месяц. Это

53💘17🥰3

2 Aug 2026, 09:09 UTC433 views45 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @owlb1rdPhoto

Выжала из себя последние две артфайт атаки на Hakkerman и Glasya В этом году была только месть, и одна полноценная атака

🥰3312

2 Aug 2026, 08:55 UTC636 views46 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Реванши на XainRussell и Hydraaa_thebat И атака на westnezz Уже подсчитали сколько работ за месяц я выдала? хд

30🔥10custom 53956368727288246746

1 Aug 2026, 16:28 UTC803 views86 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Атака на Nevolsky🖤

🔥46custom 53956368727288246742215custom 53978145886516216522🥰1

31 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC629 views93 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Реванши на Danger_Skeer 🍉 FlourBalloon ❤️‍🔥 SHpoof 🥺

🔥4926❤‍🔥11custom 53956368727288246744🥰3

30 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC751 views71 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Реванши на N-31 и CirqueL🤩🤩

52custom 539563687272882467411🔥8

29 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC800 views103 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ещё немного осталось раздать... Для HenoriKim 🔴 и MaganaDROW 🫥

🥰5922custom 539563687272882467418💘3🦄1

27 Jul 2026, 16:34 UTC≈1,120 views65 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Реванш на Anora_Drakon❤️‍🔥

48custom 539563687272882467416🥰1

27 Jul 2026, 16:26 UTC≈1,070 views65 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Для deimoncx и rrraaffh ✨

45custom 539563687272882467415🥰5

27 Jul 2026, 11:48 UTC463 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

ОТКРЫТ СБОР СРЕДСТВ НА СОЗДАНИЕ ВЫСТАВОЧНОГО ЗАЛА С РАБОТАМИ ОЛЕСИ (ссылка на сообщение матери) ПРОШУ РЕПОСТНУТЬ КУДА УГОДНО! АРТ / ЛИЧНЫЕ ТГК, ДРУЗЬЯМ, В НОВОСТНЫЕ ПАБЛИКИ 🌄🌄🌄🌄🌄 - недавно этот мир покинула прекрасная художница Олеся Косарева. Она погибла в результате наводнения. В знак памяти о ней и её творчестве, её мать открывает сбор средств на выставочный зал с работами девушки. 🌄🌄🌄🌄🌄 Переводы принимаются на но

23😢10🙏3

25 Jul 2026, 18:13 UTC849 views86 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Для Neezaar 🙂 coffeeloaf ❤ HIOLIES 💙

51❤‍🔥18🔥11🥰3custom 53956368727288246743

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @Hakkerman_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 31,748 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hakkerman” (@Hakkerman_art), 1,324 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hakkerman_art.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.