Channel
@HafezBAlAssad
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
23,199subscribers
-48 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002462920113 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HafezBAlAssad |
| Created | 8 February 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HafezBAlAssad |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 23,199 | -7 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 01:55 | 23,206 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 23,216 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:21 | 23,220 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 23,227 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:04 | 23,235 | -12 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 23,247 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 23,247 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 8 February 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Three days ago, X suspended my account a few hours after my first post. I've submitted several appeals to reverse this decision, but the administration of the platform has refused to reactivate it, without offering a clear reason. All accounts currently in my name on X are fake. I will continue posting on my telegram channel: https://t.me/HafezBAlAssad Also, Eva Bartlett (http://X.com/evakbartlett) is a friend, sh…
منذ ثلاثة أيام قامت منصة إكس بحظر حسابي بعد بضعة ساعات من نشر أول منشور. قمت بعدة محاولات لاستعادة الحساب، ولكن إدارة المنصة رفضت إعادة تفعيله من دون إعطاء مبرر واضح. جميع الحسابات التي تحمل اسمي على منصة إكس حالياً مزورة. سأتابع النشر على منصة تيليغرام: https://t.me/HafezBAlAssad
Video, posted without a caption
لم يكن هناك أي خطة، ولا حتى احتياطية، لمغادرة دمشق، ناهيك عن سورية. فعلى مدى ال١٤ عاماً الماضيين مرت سورية بظروف لم تكن أقل صعوبةً وخطورةً من التي مرت بها في نهاية تشرين الثاني وبداية كانون الأول الماضيين. ومن أراد الهروب لهرب خلالها، وخاصةً خلال السنوات الأولى عندما كانت دمشق شبه محاصرة وتُقصف يومياً، وكان الإرهابيون على أطرافها واحتمال وصولهم إلى قلب العاصمة قائماً طوال تلك الفترة. قبل بداية الأحداث الأخيرة، سافر…
2/2: Until then, despite the distant sounds of shelling, nothing seemed unusual—just the familiar reality we had grown accustomed to since the early years of the war. The situation remained unchanged as the army prepared to defend Damascus, showing no signs of the subsequent deterioration—until the sudden and unexpected news of the army’s withdrawal from Homs, mirroring earlier withdrawals from Hama, Aleppo, and Idl…
1/2: There was never a plan—not even a backup—to leave Damascus, let alone Syria. Over the past 14 years, Syria has endured hardships and dangers no less severe than those of late November and early December. Anyone intending to flee would have done so long ago, particularly in the early years when Damascus faced near siege, daily bombardment, and the constant threat of terrorists reaching its centre. Before every…
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @HafezBAlAssad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,047,058 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“حافظ الأسد” (@HafezBAlAssad), 23,199 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HafezBAlAssad.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.