Channel
@Hadmut
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
2,820subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001236225131 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Hadmut |
| Created | 22 August 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Hadmut |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 2,820 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:31 | 2,822 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 2,823 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:45 | 2,822 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (4 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,098 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:08 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Das harte Brot des besten Professors der Welt… Was für ein Schicksal, wenn der Hodenkrebs ins Hirn hochzieht. Als ob das nicht jetzt schon grotesk wäre, wie dick der jetzt aufgeflogene Cambridge-Professor Jason Arday bei seinen Lügen aufgetragen hatte, und sich niemand daran gestört hätte: Mit 11 erst sprechen, mit 18 erst lesen und schreiben gelernt, den Inhalt seiner Dissertation vergessen, weil ihm […] https://ift…
Die Endlösung in der Chemie… Dummes aus Akademien. Plagiator wegen dummer KI aufgeflogen: A tool used to rephrase plagiarised text changed "final solution" to "mass killing of an ethnic group" in a chemistry paper. Now retracted thanks to a PubPeer user who spotted this. pic.twitter.com/Ag3C6YUQr5 — Sholto David (@addictedtoigno1) August 6, 2026 Es gibt Systeme, die plagiierten Text umformulieren, damit […] https://i…
„Stand in solidarity with Jason Arday“ — Vom linken Jubel für einen schwarzen Betrüger. Zum aktuellen Hochstapler-Skandal in England passt auch das wunderbar: Die Aktion des Good Law Projects: Stand in solidarity with Jason Arday Jason is the youngest Black professor in Cambridge’s history. Rightwing newspapers are trying to smear him with fake accusations of plagiarism. We can’t let them. Stand up […] https://ift.tt…
Milli-Vanilli der Wissenschaft aufgeflogen… Die Universitäten wurden zu Irrenhäusern und haben die „juristische Alchemie“ hervorgebracht. Apparently the author of one of the most absurd doctoral dissertations I've ever exposed has since requested that ProQuest prevent the public from viewing or purchasing it. Good thing I downloaded it. You can view and download it at the link below.🔗https://t.co/ObdjoYHzRl pic.twitt…
Wenn Arbeit kein Ziel mehr ist… Gesellschaft kaputt. Aber sowas von. FOCUS schreibt, dass man Arbeitslose begleitet hat. Nicht mal eben schnell befragt, sondern jahrelang „begleitet“, Hunderte von ihnen. Ergebnis: Bürgergeld: Bei fast jedem Fünften fehlt Arbeitswille komplett Die Auswertung eines großen rehapro-Modellprojekts, an dem ich beteiligt war, zeigt das deutlich. Dabei handelt es sich nicht um eine schnelle …
Der BH-Betrug im Radsport… Es gibt Dinge, auf die wäre ich nicht gekommen. Laut FOCUS gibt es gerade Zoff im Damen-Radsport, weil man die Fahrerinnen auf unerlaubte, wettbewerbswidrige Mogel-BHs geprüft hat. Statt wie vorgesehen in einem Zelt durch eine weibliche Prüferin hat man eine Sicht-Vorprüfung durch einen alten Mann machen lassen, der nach Besichtigung der Brüste zu dem Ergebnis […] https://ift.tt/qeR2Y1K
Rassistennewsletter… Österreich hat für 400.000 Euro eine Studie über die Kleidungsstile und Modemarken Rechter erstellen lassen, weil man die heute nicht mehr an Springerstiefeln und Bomberjacken erkennen könne. Ergebnis: Sportliche Streetwear mit Kapuzenpullovern bis hin zur „Old Money“-Ästhetik mit bewusst zurückhaltender Kleidung, etwa Polohemden. Polohemden sind jetzt rechtsextrem. Mit anderen Worten: Wer sich n…
Alle unter einem Dach… Das Haus ist so links, dass es ein Wunder ist, dass es nicht umkippt. Leserzuschrift: https://ift.tt/IgbvCMp (1/2) Zur Information: Der linksideologisch ausgerichtete republikanische Anwaltsverein, der im Januar diesem Ansinnen eines Verbotsverfahrens gegen die AfD Erfolgsaussichten attestierte, wurde 1979 im Zusammenhang mit den Terrorprozessen gegen die linksextremistische RAF gegründet. Er h…
Hat man Dieter Hallervorden politisch gekauft? Prinzip Mietmaul? Ein Leser schreibt zu Hallervorden, die CDU und die Sprachpolizei: Sehr geehrter Herr Danisch, Sie schreiben in Ihrem o.g. Artikel: Zitat: „Wie kommt Hallervorden dazu, die Verengung der Meinungsfreiheit zu kritisieren und sich gleichzeitig auf die Bühne einer Partei zu stellen, die dafür mitverantwortlich ist?“ Vielleicht deswegen?? Dieter Hallervorden…
Geht Deutschlands Bonität den Bach runter? Kommt der Finanzknall? Oder besser gesagt: Die Implosion des ehemals stärksten Exportlands? Seit wievielen Jahren schreibe ich das jetzt hier im Blog, dass Deutschland finanziell gegen die Wand fahren wird, weil immer weniger Investoren noch so blöd sind, Deutschland Kredit zu geben und Anleihen zu kaufen? Dass früher oder später die Rating-Agenturen Deutschland herabstufen …
Wie grüne Feministinnen die Umvolkung erklären… Lange Zeit hieß es ja, es sei „populistisch“, „rechte Propaganda“, „Fake News“, wenn Leute sagen, wir stünden in der Gefahr einer „Umvolkung“. Anscheinend ändert sich gerade etwas. Hört der mal zu: Warum muss ich gerade darüber nachdenken, ob ich mal ein Anti-Aggressionstraining machen sollte 🤔? pic.twitter.com/tkh1846K6J — Michael 🇩🇪 (@Bundeskanz50246) August 4, 2026 L…
Fühlte sich August der Starke als Frau? Die goldene Reiterin von Dresden. Und es ist mir längst sowas von egal, ob das echt oder Satire ist: 🇩🇪 …da fällt einem nix mehr zu ein! 🙈 Leute, ich kann nicht mehr… pic.twitter.com/D1zN0IwvVC — ozzy1871 (@ozzy0123pi) August 5, 2026 Woher wissen wir, dass er sich nicht für ein Telefon oder einen Außerirdischen hielt? Und […] https://ift.tt/iAKUe7a
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @Hadmut. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,137,611 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@Hadmut named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hadmut Danisch” (@Hadmut), 2,820 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Hadmut.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.