Channel
@HadieSedaghat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
377subscribers
-16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002836844193 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HadieSedaghat |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HadieSedaghat |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:07 | 377 | -16 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 393 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:08 | 393 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (1 December 2025 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,406 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
بدترین #توجیه #آدما برای بداخلاقی، بیاخلاقی و سایر موارد #اخلاقی! «زبونش تنده وگرنه تو دلش هیچی نیس!» نه بابا زبونش همون درونشه همه چی به همه چی مربوطه، نفهم ...بفهم #نکته_اخلاقی@HadieSedaghat
Signed هادی صداقت
#شادن_فرویده یعنی: #شادی ه شرورانه یعنی شادی از #شر وارد شده به دیگران و این شادی و احساس خوب واقعی ست ، بدون ه وجدان درد چون عامل شر ،تو نیستی تو فقط ،نظاره گر ،بدبختی ه آن دیگری هستی و این که تو، جای دیگری نیستی... #نکته_مفهومی@HadieSedaghat
Signed هادی صداقت
وقتی #نسبی نگری میشه بهونهی تزویر ی چیزی ه به اسم نسبینگری که میگه: هر کسی حق داره حقیقت خودشو داشته باشه! هیچ چیز #مطلق نیست. همهچیز بستگی داره به شرایط، فرهنگ، فرد، موقعیت. تا اینجا مشکلی نیست،چون واقعاً بعضی چیزا نسبیه مثل سلیقه، سبک زندگی، یا حتی بعضی ارزشها ولی؛ مشکل از جایی شروع میشه که این نسبینگری تبدیل میشه به یه سپر دفاعی برای تزویر! من حق دارم خودمو پنهان کنم چون تو این جامعه اگه راستشو بگی نم…
Signed هادی صداقت
ما #خود های پیوسته و مقطعی برای دنیای #مم های #انسان ی با #حافظه نسب تن ،ماندگار... هستیم به لطف برآمدِ از ذهن انسان #هوش و #حافظه_مصنوعی البته #ماندگار نه #جاوید #خود@HadieSedaghat #نکته_نسبی@HadieSedaghat
Signed هادی صداقت
اگر #اندیشه های منفی را در سر نپرورانی و از این طریق به آنها خوراک نرسانی اون #فکر ها از کمبود توجه مهو خواهند شد! بمانند ابرهایی که در آسمان ذهن میآیندو میرون #نکته_ذهنی@HadieSedaghat
Signed هادی صداقت
خداوند تو را نه از روی کارهایی که کردهای ، بلکه از روی کارهایی که جرأتِ انجام دادنش را نداشتهایی محاکمه میکند. #نکته_روایی@HadieSedaghat #ژان_پل_سارتر@HadieSedaghat #ترس@HadieSedaghat
Signed هادی صداقت
نه گذشته ای وجود داره نه آینده ای زمان یک توهم ست هر چه هست حال هس.. و برنامه ریزی برای آینده در زمان حال زندگی در لحظه اکنون جریان داره، این لحظه ،لحظه آفرینش ست... حالتی که در آن انرژی تو به هیچ کجا نمیره نه به آینده و نه گذشته فقط همین جا همراه ذهن توست آماده خلق داستان اینست آرامش #نکته_فلسفی@HadieSedaghat #زمان@HadieSedaghat #حال@HadieSedaghat
Signed هادی صداقت
خدا کند که میان این خر تو خر، ما از چریدن علف نیفتیم! 🖊صادق هدایت البته درستش ، شیر تو شیره شیر اول شیر گربه سان و شیر دوم شیر گاو...شایدم ، شیر آب... همه تو همن،و این گنگ ی و مخلوط بودن چند تا چیز که نماینده بی نظمی و قاطی و پاتی بودن ماجراست ولی خر تو خر بیشتر تداعی کننده ی,جنسی ست به روایتی،چیر خر نر،داخل مادیون.. پس خواهشن،حداقل جلوی زن و بچه از مفهوم خر تو خر استفاده نکنید چون اونا ،بهتر از ما مردا این مفاهیمو…
Signed هادی صداقت
سکوت مطلقی برای تو نیست هر چقدر ساکت تر ، ضربان قلبت و ضربان تنفست واضح تر تا زمانی که من ، ناظرست سکوت مطلق وجود ندارد سکوت هم نسبی ه تا زمانی که من ی در کارست... #ذهن@HadieSedaghat #سکوت@HadieSedaghat #من@HadieSedaghat
Signed هادی صداقت
ما اون چیزی نیستیم که فکر میکنیم هستیم ما اون چیزی هستیم که فکر نمی کنیم که اون هستیم... ما #ناخودآگاه مون هم هستیم یونگ میگفت: تا زمانی که ناخودا آگاه خود را خودآگاه و آگاهانه نکنیم زندگی مارا هدایت میکند و ما آنرا سرنوشت مینامیم... کنکاش درونی احساسات ،باورها ،عقاید خط قرمز ها... صادقانه در برابر آینه #خود #ذهن #نکته_ذهنی@HadieSedaghat #ناخودآگاه@HadieSedaghat #ذهن@HadieSedaghat
Signed هادی صداقت
#نکته_مفهومی #ریا ادای احترامی ست که #پلیدی رو به شکلِ برتری به نمایش میده
Signed هادی صداقت
مینیمالیسم یعنی کاستن در بیشترین زیبایی مینیمالیسم در دل خود سادگی داره کمتر درگیر شدن بیشتر بودن در لحظه حال خوشبختی منوط به چیزها نیست به اشیا نیست چون ، اساسن من ماشین نیستم ما انسان ماشینی که ذهنمون مث ،وز وز مگس تکرار میشود که همانا در ذهن هم نشخوار و تکرار و تسلسل در دور باطل... مینیمالیسم: یعنی ، حداقل ها در بهترین حالت حال ،اذهانی که مسموم نشده و چشمانشان با شلوغی و تکرار بی جهت در مفهوم زیبایی آلوده شدن اذها…
Signed هادی صداقت
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HadieSedaghat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 219,422 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هادی صداقت 🪞” (@HadieSedaghat), 377 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HadieSedaghat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.