Channel
@HackOcean
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
2,988subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001735554351 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HackOcean |
| Created | 28 March 2022 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HackOcean |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 21:51 | 2,988 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 2,990 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 2,990 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 28 March 2022 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 November 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
208 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 126 | 60.6% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 23.6% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 9.13% | |
| 👎 | 6 | 2.88% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.962% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 0.962% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.962% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.481% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.481% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 208reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2022 to 12 November 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Hack Ocean pinned «Hack Ocean is free NOW ‼️ Get your free invite link with /link 🥷 See how to work with the bot by watching the demo below 🤖 You can use both /share (with inline arguments) & /forward (replying the message) commands to contribute Some major changes: ⭕️ Messages…»
Video, posted without a caption
👍35👎4❤2
Hack Ocean is free NOW ‼️ Get your free invite link with /link 🥷 See how to work with the bot by watching the demo below 🤖 You can use both /share (with inline arguments) & /forward (replying the message) commands to contribute Some major changes: ⭕️ Messages must have hashtag(s). You can use /tags in the bot to see available hashtags for now. ⭕️ Only links with HTTP & HTTPS schemes are accepted @HackOcean @RedBl…
❤18👍3🌭1🥴1
Hack Ocean pinned «Hello anonymous contributors🥷 As you know, the main purpose of creating this bot and channel is to share links and useful content with each other Although the main strength of the bot was to force users to share links, sometimes this force had a negative…»
Future of hack ocean
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍18❤3
Hello anonymous contributors🥷 As you know, the main purpose of creating this bot and channel is to share links and useful content with each other Although the main strength of the bot was to force users to share links, sometimes this force had a negative side Last month, the bot was unavailable for some reasons, and as an apology and to improve quality of the channel, we prepared the following vote for you to help…
❤6👍4
The number of links required for membership has been reduced to 3 per month 🔓 Hack Ocean Bot => @HackOceanBot @Hide01 @HackOcean @RedBlueHit
❤17👏1😈1
Note that it is only possible for you to become a member with the link that you get through the bot (with /link command). If you enter the channel with another account and someone else's invitation link, you will be automatically banned after 24 hours and the account you created the link can not create a new link and join the channel for at least a month.💀 From now on, links will be accepted more strictly to have mo…
👍20😁2
♨️UPDATES♨️ ▫️If you have more than 3 months of membership, your membership wouldn't increase by sending more links ▫️You can send your hashtags at the bottom of the message, separated by space and then /reply on it as the picture. If no hashtags are provided, simple hashtags will be added by admins. Hack Ocean Bot => @HackOceanBot @Hide01 @HackOcean @RedBlueHit
👍12👏3
Hack Ocean pinned «❓ What is Hack Ocean? Hack Ocean is the place where you can find & share massive collection of resources related to any Cyber Security domain including personal blogs, writeups, tools, youtube videos, tweets and many more. ❓ How to join in the Hack Ocean…»
❓ How to work with Hack Ocean bot? See the video to find answer of your question and also you will be familiar with the features! Hack Ocean Bot => @HackOceanBot @Hide01 @HackOcean @RedBlueHit
👍9👏3❤1
⚖️ Hack Ocean Rules & Advices ⚖️ ⛔️ Do not send shortened links ✳️ Give a direct link to the article or post ⛔️ Avoid additional parameters in the link ✳️ Use the correct schema and words as much as possible (do not use hxxps or [dot]) ⛔️ Do not spam ✳️ What links should you send? Links to Blogs, YouTube, Twitter, Writeups, Cybersecurity news, New Tools, etc. (don't send mega and course links) ℹ️ To get acquainted …
👏6👍5
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @HackOcean. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Future of hack ocean
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2022 to 12 November 2022. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,056,414 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hack Ocean” (@HackOcean), 2,988 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HackOcean.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.