Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

.โ€ข ๐…๐จ๐ฑ ๐“บ ๐“บ๐Ÿ’ป

@H_I_BA_H

On this record: Topic ยท Observations ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

17,794subscribers

-96 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001288761780
TypeChannel
Username@H_I_BA_H
Description.
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/H_I_BA_H

Topic

Other / unclassifiable โ€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channelโ€™s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a modelโ€™s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far below this size band

10.9 average views per post against 17,794 subscribers โ€” an engagement rate of 0.061%. Across the 4,324 registered channels in the same cohort โ€” 10,000โ€“31,619 subscribers, posting mainly in Arabic โ€” the middle half sit between 2.98% and 14.5%, with a median of 7.20%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (13 July 2026 โ€“ 12 August 2026)
Posts measured39 of 39 published in the window (39 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled427
Mature posts only0.061% over 39 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers17,794 measured 12 August 2026
Cohortb10000:ara ยท 4,324 channels ยท p10 1.01% ยท p25 2.98% ยท p50 7.20% ยท p75 14.5% ยท p90 25.3%
Position in cohort0.139th percentile ยท 1/111 the cohort median
Uncertaintyยฑ0% of the figure, from Telegramโ€™s rounding
Post languageArabic ยท 100.0%of the windowโ€™s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3ร— away from that cohortโ€™s median โ€” below it โ€” on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes โ€” audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channelโ€™s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 12 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through โ€” we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

17,79417,89017,8427 August 2026 โ€” 17,890 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 17,867 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 17,850 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 17,830 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 17,815 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 17,794 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net -96. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 17,780โ€“17,904 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 05:2617,794-21
11 Aug 2026, 06:3617,815-15
10 Aug 2026, 10:0117,830-20
9 Aug 2026, 11:0117,850-17
8 Aug 2026, 09:4317,867-23
7 Aug 2026, 12:1517,890first reading

Engagement

39 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
0.062%
avg views รท 17,794 subscribers
Avg views / post
11.1
39 posts measured
Reaction rate
62.4%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
39
of 39 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held39 (2 August 2026 โ€“ 9 August 2026)
Views total433
Reactions total270
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 00:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
739
Videos
9
Links
57

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

270 reactions across 39 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 10.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ˜˜2810.4%
โค238.52%
๐Ÿ•Š217.78%
๐Ÿ˜217.78%
๐Ÿฅฐ197.04%
๐ŸŽ‰165.93%
๐Ÿ˜165.93%
๐Ÿ”ฅ155.56%
๐Ÿ‘134.81%
๐Ÿ™ˆ134.81%
๐Ÿ‘124.44%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ114.07%
๐Ÿคฉ93.33%
โšก62.22%
๐Ÿ“62.22%
๐Ÿณ62.22%
๐Ÿ’˜62.22%
๐Ÿ’ฏ62.22%
๐Ÿ’‹41.48%
๐Ÿ˜ˆ41.48%
11 further kinds155.56%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 39 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 270reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 39 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 22:55 UTC8 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @v_x_errPhoto

ุจู„ุงุบ ุจุดุฃู† ุงู„ุงุจุชุฒุงุฒ ุงู„ุฅู„ูƒุชุฑูˆู†ูŠ ูˆุงู„ุชู‡ุฏูŠุฏ ูˆุงุณุชุบู„ุงู„ ุตูˆุฑ ุงู„ูุชูŠุงุช ุฃุชู‚ุฏู… ุจู‡ุฐุง ุงู„ุจู„ุงุบ ุถุฏ ุงู„ู…ุฏุนูˆ ุฃู†ุณ ู…ุญู…ุฏ ุนุจุฏุงู„ู„ู‡ ู‚ุงุณู… ุงู„ุตุจุฑูŠุŒ ู…ู† ู…ุญุงูุธุฉ ุชุนุฒุŒ ูˆุฐู„ูƒ ู„ู„ุงุดุชุจุงู‡ ุจู‚ูŠุงู…ู‡ ุจู…ู…ุงุฑุณุงุช ุชุชุนู„ู‚ ุจุชู‡ุฏูŠุฏ ูˆุงุจุชุฒุงุฒ ูุชูŠุงุช ุจุงุณุชุฎุฏุงู… ุตูˆุฑู‡ู† ูˆู…ุนู„ูˆู…ุงุชู‡ู† ุงู„ุฎุงุตุฉุŒ ูˆู…ุญุงูˆู„ุฉ ุงู„ุถุบุท ุนู„ูŠู‡ู† ูˆุชู‡ุฏูŠุฏู‡ู† ุจู†ุดุฑ ุงู„ุตูˆุฑ ุฃูˆ ุงุณุชุบู„ุงู„ู‡ุง. ูƒู…ุง ุชูˆุฌุฏ ุงุฏุนุงุกุงุช ุญูˆู„ ู‚ูŠุงู…ู‡ ุจุชู†ุณูŠู‚ ุนู„ุงู‚ุงุช ูˆุงุณุชุบู„ุงู„ ุตูˆุฑ ูˆู…ุนู„ูˆู…ุงุช ุดุฎุตูŠุฉ ู„ูุชูŠุงุชุŒ ูˆู‡ูŠ ุฃู…ูˆุฑ ุฃุทู„ุจ ู…ู† ุงู„ุฌู‡ุฉ ุงู„ู…ุฎุชุตุฉ ุงู„ุชุญู‚ู‚ ู…ู†ู‡ุง ุฑุณู…ูŠู‹ุง ู…ู† ุฎู„ุงู„ ุงู„ุฃุฏู„โ€ฆ

โค1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿ•Š1๐Ÿฅฐ1๐Ÿ˜1

Signed ุงุจู€โƒชโƒชู€ูˆ โƒชโƒชุงู„ู€ูƒู€ู„โคฟ

9 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC9 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @cr2hb

ุงู„ุงูƒุซุฑ ูŠุญุท ูŠุงุฎุฐ๐ŸŒนุชู†ุชู‡ูŠ 7:45

๐Ÿ•Š4๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿฅฐ1๐Ÿ˜1

Signed แŽชแดฮŒฮŒแŽ หโžซ

9 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC10 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @cr2hb

ุงู„ุงูƒุซุฑ ูŠุญุท ูŠุงุฎุฐ๐ŸŒนุชู†ุชู‡ูŠ ูง:ูฃูง

๐Ÿ•Š2๐Ÿ“1๐ŸŽ‰1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿคฉ1๐Ÿฅฐ1

Signed แŽชแดฮŒฮŒแŽ หโžซ

9 Aug 2026, 04:49 UTC13 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @IY_PX

ุงู„ุงูƒุซุฑ ูŠุญุท ูŠุงุฎุฐ๐ŸŒนุชู†ุชู‡ูŠ 7:52

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ’˜1๐Ÿ•Š1๐Ÿฅฐ1๐Ÿฅฑ1๐Ÿ˜1๐Ÿ˜˜1

Signed แŽชแดฮŒฮŒแŽ หโžซ

9 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC13 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @IY_PX

ุงู„ุงูƒุซุฑ ูŠุญุท ูŠุงุฎุฐ๐ŸŒนุชู†ุชู‡ูŠ7:42

๐Ÿ™ˆ2โค1๐ŸŽ‰1๐Ÿณ1๐Ÿ’‹1๐Ÿ˜1

Signed แŽชแดฮŒฮŒแŽ หโžซ

9 Aug 2026, 04:30 UTC13 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @IY_PX

ุงู„ุงูƒุซุฑ ูŠุญุท ูŠุงุฎุฐ๐ŸŒนุชู†ุชู‡ูŠ7:32

๐ŸŽ‰2๐Ÿพ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿ˜˜1๐Ÿ™ˆ1

Signed แŽชแดฮŒฮŒแŽ หโžซ

9 Aug 2026, 04:11 UTC9 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @IY_PX

โ€ข ุชู… ุจุฏุก ู„ุนุจุฉ ุงู„ู‚ุฑุนุฉ ุจู†ุฌุงุญ ๐ŸŽฒ โ€ข ุชู… ุงู„ุฅู†ุถู…ุงู… โ†ค S โ€ข ุนุฏุฏ ุงู„ู„ุงุนุจูŠู† โ†ค 1 โ€ข ู„ู„ู…ุดุงุฑูƒุฉ ุงุถุบุท ุงู„ุฒุฑ ุฃุณูู„

๐Ÿ˜2โค1โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ˜1๐Ÿ˜˜1

Signed แŽชแดฮŒฮŒแŽ หโžซ

9 Aug 2026, 03:12 UTC10 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @IY_PX

ุชุนุงู„ูˆ ู†ู„ุนุจ ุงุณุฆู„ู‡

๐Ÿ‘2๐Ÿ’˜1๐Ÿ•Š1๐Ÿฅฐ1๐Ÿ™ˆ1

Signed แŽชแดฮŒฮŒแŽ หโžซ

9 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC19 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ู†ู‡ุฑ

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿณ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿคก1๐Ÿคฉ1๐Ÿ˜1๐Ÿ˜˜1

Signed โ€ข ๐…๐จ๐ฑ ๐“บ

9 Aug 2026, 01:14 UTC10 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ุงู„ุงูƒุซุฑ ูŠุญุท ูŠุงุฎุฐ๐Ÿงธุชู†ุชู‡ูŠ 4:15

โค2๐Ÿคฉ2๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ—ฟ1๐Ÿ™ˆ1

Signed แŽชแดฮŒฮŒแŽ หโžซ

8 Aug 2026, 05:42 UTC9 views8 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @IY_PX

ุงุณุฆู„ู‡ ูˆู„ุง ูˆุฏูƒู… ุงุณุฑุน ุŸ

๐Ÿ˜2โค1โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ’ฏ1๐Ÿฅฑ1๐Ÿ˜˜1๐Ÿ™ˆ1

Signed แŽชแดฮŒฮŒแŽ หโžซ

8 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC10 views7 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @IY_PX

ุงุณุฃู„ู‡ ูˆู„ุง ุงุณุฑุน ุŸ

โ˜ƒ1โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ‘1๐Ÿ”ฅ1๐Ÿ•Š1๐Ÿ˜1๐Ÿ˜˜1

Signed แŽชแดฮŒฮŒแŽ หโžซ

Showing the 12 most recent of 39 posts we hold for @H_I_BA_H. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ.โ€ข ๐…๐จ๐ฑ ๐“บ ๐“บ๐Ÿ’ปโ€ (@H_I_BA_H), 17,794 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/H_I_BA_H.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.