🔴 مطلوب حسابات ببجي - تيك توك - كلانات ببجي - قريات من 14-18 وكلانات للعرض بسعر مناسب 💟 ➡️ @telrw ✅

Channel
بيع حسابات كلاش وبوبجي
@H_HJT
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
11,539subscribers
-3,388 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001452342131 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @H_HJT @SsSsSsDop |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 22 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 50 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/H_HJT |
Topic
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:15 | 11,539 | +345 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 12:10 | 11,194 | +387 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 10:50 | 10,807 | +192 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 08:04 | 10,615 | -18 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 10:19 | 10,633 | -30 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 07:19 | 10,663 | -15 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:27 | 10,678 | -23 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 03:48 | 10,701 | -18 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:41 | 10,719 | -18 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 03:48 | 10,737 | -24 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 02:16 | 10,761 | -21 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 02:10 | 10,782 | +10,769 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 15:47 | 13 | -10,779 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 10,792 | -36 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 16:49 | 10,828 | -20 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 19:17 | 10,848 | -20 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 22:14 | 10,868 | -21 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 23:26 | 10,889 | -22 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:26 | 10,911 | +10,897 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 14 | first reading |
Engagement
41 posts held, back to 20 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.739%
- avg views ÷ 11,539 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 85.3
- 7 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 7
- of 41 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 41 (20 August 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 597 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Nov 2026, 06:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1h 05m
- Average length
- 2m 43s
Measured directly from 24 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 84.6% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 20 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 41 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @H_HJT. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 August 2026 to 3 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
🗡🗡 قـــريــه كــلــاش لـــلبــيــع 🗡🗡 🔵 الربط // سوبر سيل 🔥🔥 🤑 سعر // 50 ماستر 🤑 📞 تواصل// @telrw✅️ 🌟 دليل ثقه // @xheeu ✅️ ‼️ ملاحظه :- القريه كلش مرتبه 💙 💎 قنواتنا :- @soznf @soxzf @H_HJT ⭐️
🗡🗡 قـــريــه كــلــاش لـــلبــيــع 🗡🗡 🔵 الربط // سوبر سيل 🔥🔥 🤑 سعر // 250 ماستر 🤑 📞 تواصل// @telrw✅️ 🌟 دليل ثقه // @xheeu ✅️ ‼️ ملاحظه :- القريه كلش مرتبه 💙 💎 قنواتنا :- @soznf @soxzf @H_HJT ⭐️
🗡🗡 قـــريــه كــلــاش لـــلبــيــع 🗡🗡 🔵 الربط // سوبر سيل 🔥🔥 🤑 سعر // 35 ماستر 🤑 📞 تواصل// @M_8_7✅️ 🌟 دليل ثقه // @xheeu ✅️ ‼️ ملاحظه :- القريه كلش مرتبه 💙 💎 قنواتنا :- @soznf @soxzf @H_HJT ⭐️
سعره 70 ماستر @M_8_7
☪☪ ـ🤍 نباع الله يهني الشراي 🤍 دليل ثقه :- @xheeu ⭐️
🗡🗡 كــلــاش رويال لـــلبــيــع 🗡🗡 🔵 الربط // سوبر سيل 🔥🔥 🤑 سعر // 15ماستر 🤑 📞 تواصل// @ah_6s ✅️ 🌟 دليل ثقه // @xheeu ✅️ ‼️ ملاحظه :- الحساب مرتبه وياه تاون 11شبه ماكس 💙 💎 قنواتنا :- @soznf @soxzf @H_HJT ⭐️
🗡🗡 حساب ببجي لـــلبــيــع🗡🗡 🔵 الربط // مضمون 🔥🔥 🤑 سعر // سووم 🤑 📞 تواصل// @Asscfr✅️ 🌟 دليل ثقه // @xheeu ✅️ ‼️ ملاحظة :- الحساب مرتب + يرهم اقساط 💙 💎 قنواتنا :- @soznf @soxzf @H_HJT ⭐️
Signed عبدالله
- لـڤل الحـساب 78 - لفل المجموع 61 - عدد الميثـك 84 - المخـتبر 23🤩🌟🌟 - الربط داخلي - المـبلغ 130 ماستر 📱 - للتواصل @M_8_7
Signed 𝘼𝙃𝙈𝙀𝘿 𝘼𝙡-𝙎𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙞𝙙𝙖𝙞𝙚
- لـڤل الحـساب 68 ⭐ - المخـتبر 24 🤩 - ربـط يتغير بالكامل - المـبلغ 150 ماستر 📱 - للتواصل @telrw👜
❤️❤️كارت شعبيه ❤️❤️ 🤑السعر • 5 ماستر 🤑 🛍القيمه • 50k 🔥🔥 🔈تواصل : @M_8_7🤔 ‼️دليل الثقه : @xheeu✔️
❤2
Signed 𝘼𝙃𝙈𝙀𝘿 𝘼𝙡-𝙎𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙞𝙙𝙖𝙞𝙚
❤️❤️كارت شعبيه ❤️❤️ 🤑السعر • 5 ماستر 🤑 🛍القيمه • 50k 🔥🔥 🔈تواصل : @M_8_7🤔 ‼️دليل الثقه : @xheeu✔️
❤1
Signed 𝘼𝙃𝙈𝙀𝘿 𝘼𝙡-𝙎𝙪𝙢𝙖𝙞𝙙𝙖𝙞𝙚
Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @H_HJT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@H_HJT edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 23 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 30 August 2026
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 7 posts on @H_HJT as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 22 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 30 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 26 hours
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بيع حسابات كلاش وبوبجي” (@H_HJT), 11,539 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/H_HJT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.