Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 联盟的分享频道

Channel

联盟的分享频道

@HSGQSJK

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,727subscribers

+51 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003512816974
TypeChannel
Username@HSGQSJK
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/HSGQSJK

Growth

1,6761,7271,701.528 August 2026 — 1,676 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,679 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,692 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,706 subscribers9 September 2026 — 1,727 subscribers28 August 20269 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 12 days, net +51. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,668–1,735 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Sept 2026, 15:581,727+21
4 Sept 2026, 00:371,706+14
31 Aug 2026, 14:541,692+13
28 Aug 2026, 16:021,679+3
28 Aug 2026, 10:161,676first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.6%
avg views ÷ 1,727 subscribers
Avg views / post
494
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held19 (24 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total8,885
Reactions total121
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

121 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3629.8%
👌2924.0%
😱2823.1%
1915.7%
🤮86.61%
😇10.826%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 121 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 18 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @HSGQSJK. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 09:18 UTC5 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @hipxx

查档业务·公示 业务类型:Q反(登录设备读取sim卡,带该sim卡登录设备地址) 定价:30u 对接商家: @zjqfh 时效标准:读十分钟秒 违规提示未回可补发消息,恶意骚扰将直接拉黑

👍1

Signed 郑十方海(无限猖狂)

26 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTCviews —

联盟的分享频道 pinned «频道内内容麻烦转发带频道用户名看清楚是用户名 投稿到其他频道也麻烦带上»

26 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC436 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

频道内内容麻烦转发带频道用户名看清楚是用户名 投稿到其他频道也麻烦带上

👌5

25 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC516 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

AllianceRescue 联盟防格机模块 2.0 我们会不断完善更新

👍5

25 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC525 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

就大量更新TG机器人源码 让⭕💰🐶饿死

5

25 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC520 viewsread 28 August 2026

经过内部商量 更新完一键隐藏环境模块和防止格机变砖模块

25 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC520 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

是不是感觉更新的机器人源码比较少

2

25 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC422 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @hipxxFile

天要赐我辉煌 我必比天更狂 本期封禁“峰峰吃鸡” 千万粉丝

😱8👍42

Signed 郑十方海(无限猖狂)

25 Aug 2026, 12:40 UTC525 views3 reactionsread 28 August 2026

http://cmapi.top/api/qingbaoju.php?q=410402200401275732&key=MFRBUWXRG6MZWGKM http://cmapi.top/api/dingdang_cat.php?query=410402200401275732

👍3

Signed Lion

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @HSGQSJK. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“联盟的分享频道” (@HSGQSJK), 1,727 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HSGQSJK.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.