Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

HARDHEIM CLOSED.

@HRDHM404

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,492subscribers

-34 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002760098045
TypeChannel
Username@HRDHM404
Created26 November 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HRDHM404

Growth

1,4921,5261,5096 August 2026 — 1,526 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,526 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,506 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,492 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -34. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,487–1,531 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:181,492-14
10 Aug 2026, 04:211,506-20
7 Aug 2026, 00:371,526no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:331,526first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 26 November 2025the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 2 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52855341019006571371016.4%
custom 5282870247219563904914.8%
custom 5285270347959012255914.8%
custom 5283282134583249495711.5%
custom 528319468904909792069.84%
custom 528286703028905716446.56%
custom 528539411173661197846.56%
custom 528320406496271179534.92%
custom 528551262706417945134.92%
custom 528551493346161382034.92%
23.28%
💯11.64%

Custom emoji. 10 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2025 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jun 2026, 16:30 UTC601 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

канал закрыт. патент, название, оформление и всё остальное - остается за нами и запрещается к использованию. все вопросы к владельцу: @t1ae1lv

💯1

29 Nov 2025, 11:00 UTC≈4,590 views60 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🫥 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 𝐇𝐀𝐑𝐃𝐇𝐄𝐈𝐌 / Хардхейм закрепляется за нами с 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🌟на всех языках и склонениях, и не допускается к полному и частичному копированию. Так же оформление и стикерпаки с нашим названием несут наше авторство, в связи с этим, мы убедительно просим не использовать чужие работы в личных целях. 🤩Надеемся на благополучное сотрудничество.

custom 528553410190065713710custom 52828702472195639049custom 52852703479590122559custom 52832821345832494957custom 52831946890490979206custom 52828670302890571644custom 52853941117366119784custom 52832040649627117953

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @HRDHM404. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 895,677 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HARDHEIM CLOSED.” (@HRDHM404), 1,492 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HRDHM404.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.