Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for -أمــان 🏠❤️ ⊁ .

Channel

-أمــان 🏠❤️ ⊁ .

@HN_AV

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,176subscribers

-27 since we began measuring on 9 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001953572633
TypeChannel
Username@HN_AV
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 September 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/HN_AV

Growth

5,1765,2035,189.59 September 2026 — 5,203 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,203 subscribers11 September 2026 — 5,199 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,191 subscribers19 September 2026 — 5,176 subscribers9 September 202619 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -27. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,172–5,207 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 05:365,176-15
14 Sept 2026, 14:225,191-8
11 Sept 2026, 07:385,199-4
9 Sept 2026, 12:225,203no change
9 Sept 2026, 11:475,203first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 5,176 subscribers
Avg views / post
571
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 September 2026
Posts held20 (23 August 20268 September 2026)
Views total11,410
Reactions total226
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Sept 2026, 12:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

226 reactions across 19 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘12655.8%
🍓4620.4%
🥰3415.0%
🌚93.98%
🙈73.10%
👀20.885%
😭10.442%
🦄10.442%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 August 2026 to 8 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Sept 2026, 09:57 UTC387 views13 reactionsread 9 September 2026

- صلِّ علۍ النبي يـٰ ذوق💕💕💕💕💕🐢""".

🥰7💘4🍓2

Signed Esraa Wagehe

2 Sept 2026, 17:24 UTC493 views10 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @ful_art

أنا مليش بديل ومجاش ولا هييجي زيي ودي ثقه وغرور وڪل اللي يجي في دماغـك ، أنا مبخسرش حد فدايا الدنيا ڪلها بناسها .

🥰10

Signed 𓏺 mᥲnᥲr ᥲᥣᎥ 𓏺 .

2 Sept 2026, 10:04 UTC530 views14 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Photo

البوكيه اللي نفسي فيه💗😂

🙈7💘6🥰1

Signed Esraa Wagehe

1 Sept 2026, 12:56 UTC544 views1 reactionsread 9 September 2026

Posted without readable text

😭1

Signed حُب ꢾ𓍢ִ໋ ֢

1 Sept 2026, 12:27 UTC481 views11 reactionsread 9 September 2026

مش محتاجين غير إننا نتطمن ، وإننا نتحب بمنتهۍ التلقائية والبساطة اللۍ فينا ، ونڪون مع ناس مُريحة ، إحنا نستاهل دَ ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨>>>

💘8🥰2🦄1

Signed 𓏺 mᥲnᥲr ᥲᥣᎥ 𓏺 .

1 Sept 2026, 12:26 UTC506 views11 reactionsread 9 September 2026

- التفاهم والقبول بِـ النسبالي تاني أكتر حاجة attractive بعد الحنية تخيل حد يفهمك و يفهم تقلباتك المزاجية و يتقبلك كده زى ما أنت 💗

💘10🥰1

Signed Esraa Wagehe

31 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC465 viewsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @FatahTohawelPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed حُب ꢾ𓍢ִ໋ ֢

29 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC504 views15 reactionsread 9 September 2026
Forwarded from @FatahTohawelPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🍓11💘2🥰2

Signed حُب ꢾ𓍢ִ໋ ֢

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @HN_AV. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

صَـبَّـار🌵𝚂𝚊𝚋𝚊𝚛
@OfficialSabar · 23,540
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 18 September 2026
↬ 𝒏 𝒆 𝒕 𝒘 𝒐 𝒓 𝒌 ، 💖🔮↻.
@roooror · 23,960
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 17 September 2026
Dr.nadine Alaa sherif
@gynaandobsdrnadine · 27,641
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 September 2026
تشيلو - Çello
@clarinet98 · 28,553
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 9 September 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“-أمــان 🏠❤️ ⊁ .” (@HN_AV), 5,176 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HN_AV.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.