白嫖黑金版的看这里❤️
👍1

Channel
@HNNB26
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,708subscribers
-73 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002220440578 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HNNB26 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HNNB26 |
Software piracy — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
@HNNB26 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Sept 2026, 11:38 | 6,708 | -50 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 6,758 | -11 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 16:37 | 6,769 | +26 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:39 | 6,743 | +38 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:22 | 6,705 | +76 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 6,629 | -17 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:33 | 6,646 | -18 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 6,664 | -31 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 6,695 | -31 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:52 | 6,726 | -21 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 23:57 | 6,747 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:14 | 6,758 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:59 | 6,773 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 6,781 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 6,781 | first reading |
51 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 51 (6 August 2026 – 6 September 2026) |
| Views total | 3,585 |
| Reactions total | 29 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
76 reactions across 35 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 70 | 92.1% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 3.95% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 2.63% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 1.32% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 35 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 6 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
白嫖黑金版的看这里❤️
👍1
https://wwayb.lanzouw.com/b01gia7p7g 密码 HNHJ
👍1
ZMSF244E77F93BA2BDB342C11B7869F3 ZMS119AB4E9139B4946D5F7E2E53B40B ZMS9A20A22461B00DA07632C06452E7D ZMS58C50359BF631CA5C0299BC087B1B ZMS847672D1ED349CCBC8E31E22081DA ZMS8F83C51598AC15B48D7610D596C8D ZMS08C57683D42C54306EE9BA12ED1AF ZMS0D5F01CC05FAE169BC501522DA602 ZMS669A1E0912FD8010C02FC9681EB2A ZMS2B7EA76FD666B9511C4859A459BAB
👍2
白嫖黑金版的卡密看这里。
Photo, posted without a caption
👍4🥱1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍1
如何白嫖火鸟黑金版卡密?🔈 快手发布作品有奖活动!!!! ① 在快手发布火鸟相关作品可以找客服领取一张你的专属卡密!流量突破1万可以领取一张专属三天卡 ②在各大内核视频评论50个评论可以私信找客服领取一张专属天卡,内容是耳机@HNNB22 ③只要你发作品按照相关标题 #火鸟内核 #火鸟公益内核 按照此话题发布作品!即可立即找客服领取一张专属卡密! 作品发布成功之后并在评论区置顶!耳机@HNNB26 找客服领取一张专属卡密 ④如果你们在快手直播火鸟内核被我刷到或者有作品的流量!我会关注你并私信发你一张月卡!直播人员我会奖励18.88现金红包 领奖客服找 @xxmsjh88
👍5❤2
反馈图频道无引流 @HNJJD8
👍2
体验过黑金版你们就不会想玩其他的了 要体验卡联系我 @xxmsjh88
👍2
🎮火鸟黑金版追锁漏打(适配5-6系玩家) 💎功能介绍如下:过几天加巡查提示功能 😳采用独家自适应写法跟游戏刷新率同步 丝滑流畅不卡顿 月卡用户刷入独家模块打开游戏自动启动 《可过查设备,完美伪装 根本查不出来 上游戏自带效果 不用初始化辅助》 🥵自瞄采用全网独家陀螺仪写法 不用刷陀螺仪模块 自瞄算法吊打全网 适配所有配件和枪械 300米子弹都在一个点 每把枪械自适应压枪 追踪距离 概率 范围支持 步枪 狙击 爆炸弓 喷子 单独调节 烟雾不追/框内自瞄/掉血自瞄/烟雾不锁/自瞄控件/追踪控件/漏手模式/无靶压枪/扫车不追 智能倒地不追:优先追站着的敌人 🤯支持绘制 物资 DIY调节颜色和大小 全物资单独勾选 🤯有解密设置:下发加密的号也可以正常游玩 😄追锁部位:头部/漏哪打哪/指哪打哪 《指哪打哪:有15个部位 非常真实 漏个手指头脚趾头都能打》 最新模型渲染 追光渲染漏打 绘制湿滑不掉帧 掐雷变色 敌人掐雷所有…
❤1👍1
黑金黄金连打上王牌
🥰2👍1
过几天加巡查功能
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @HNNB26. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Firebird火鸟黑金漏打版” (@HNNB26), 6,708 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HNNB26.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.