Channel
@HLGGB1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,886subscribers
+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002882147230 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HLGGB1 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HLGGB1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 4,886 | +11 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:06 | 4,875 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 4,881 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:51 | 4,876 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 4,878 | first reading |
38 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 38 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 9,698 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 05:10 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 80.0% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
欢乐谷报告https://t.me/SZHLG1 【验证留名】托尼史大颗 【验证时间】2026.8.11 【老师艺名】艾玛 【课室位置】平峦山地铁站附近公寓 【联系方式】@EmmaBB55 【上课价位】1000p（工兵券） 【颜值身材】顶美的翘臀，紧实八字形胸部，7.5分颜值 【服务内容】共浴，轻度调情，浅吻，姿势任意 【体验细节】 偶然看到孤零零的一张券，没有犹豫就下手了。仔细看发现是留学的洋马，看照片没有过多修饰，面容亲切，于是联系上介绍人就出发了。 开门时映入眼帘的是一位红衣包臀短裤的女孩，没有欧洲人的面部轮廓和骨架，约1米6左右，更似皮肤带点黝黑一些中东女孩，兴许是我少见多怪。她冲我一笑，一身班味卸去。没有风尘味，更谈不上熟练。仅是和我侧坐一起，任我凑近抚摸拥抱，只缓慢回应着，我用着勉强够用的英语和她交流着，了解到是重庆在读的学生，为了凑学费，所以我也主动交了水费。然后一同奔向卧室，互相抚摸着对方的身体，仿佛没有语言的…
欢乐谷报告https://t.me/SZHLG1 【验证留名】ZZ 【验证时间】8.11 【老师艺名】林雪 【课室位置】南山 【联系方式】@linxueii 【上课价位】1000p 【颜值身材】人照一致，身材高挑，前凸后翘 【服务内容】共浴，xcz 【体验细节】 第一眼看见老师，就是高挑的身材，修长的双腿，胸也挺拔，这身材确实非常的顶。 来到穿上老师用她小嘴照顾得我小牛牛无微不至，马上傲然挺立，这谁受得了，立马带上雨伞，长枪直入，直捣巢穴，略有阻感，妙哉妙哉，然后开始进进出出，前前后后，上上下下，各种姿势尝试个便，老师也非常的配合，最后成功出水。 【优点缺点】肤白貌美大长腿，不介意抽烟的话，没什么缺点。 【推荐程度】9.8分，满分10分 ✅聊天记录已验证 报告有很强的主观性，仅作为出击参考，不要作为出击依据。
欢乐谷报告https://t.me/SZHLG1 【验证留名】橘子 【验证时间】8月11日 【老师艺名】迪丽米娜 【课室位置】宝安西乡 【联系方式】私聊：@jing8888666 【上课价位】500♻️ 【颜值身材】奶子白大 【服务内容】口爆 【体验细节】约好时间，到了地方进门之后环境挺好的，收拾的很干净，人长得很好身材也不错，然后开始进入正题，主动要求跟我一起洗澡，洗澡过程中主动贴上来🐍吻。热情主动这点很加分！洗完会帮我擦身体，然后到床上穿上了我喜欢的制服，将老师的身材衬托的非常好，太性感了，小弟弟立马就有反应了，两个大灯手感很好，姿势要求不过分，都还可以，给我口的过程，看着我眼睛太迷人了，不得不说老师的口活还可以，虽然刚开，69舔鲍鱼时，水多无异味，舔得老师顶不住了。然后老师握着我的鸡吧，先是舌舔，从根部滑到龟头，包裹感十足，滑动，打转，实在太舒服了，10分钟不到就交枪了，完事后也没有催着去洗澡，聊了一下天儿，洗澡结束，这…
欢乐谷报告https://t.me/SZHLG1 【验证留名】gbsjq 【验证时间】8.10 【老师艺名】江晚晴 【课室位置】深圳南山 【联系方式】@jqing99 【上课价位】700P 【颜值身材】9 【服务内容】课程表一样 【体验细节】和江晚晴老师联系之后直接去了教室，进门和江晚晴老师寒暄几句便交了水费开始洗澡，江晚晴老师很细心的准备了自己的沐浴露。洗的非常细致但浴室太小了影响老师的水中萧，后面去床上老师开始展示口活。多的不说老师口的非常卖力期间还会问你有没有不舒服的地方，口完戴上雨伞开始女上，老师的女上是自己悬空的那种不会压到你。后面老师说好累，我起身一摸老师下面全是水，然后开始侧入，侧入的感觉还是比较强烈的，可能身体不好吧换了好几个姿势都蛇不出来，到后面我和老师换着来吸出来的。玩得很尽兴，就江晚晴老师那些闷骚似的浪劲一定还要来 【优点缺点】无 【推荐程度】满分9.5分 ✅聊天记录已验证 报告有很强的主观性，仅作为出击…
欢乐谷报告https://t.me/SZHLG1 【验证留名】🦞 【验证时间】8.10 【老师艺名】林雪 【课室位置】南山 【联系方式】@linxueii 【上课价位】工兵半价 【颜值身材】身材好 【服务内容】共浴，xcz 【体验细节】约了老师的尾课，刚进门是一个身材高挑的老师，然后我们休息了一下，一起去洗澡，因为老师有夜课，所以会赶时间一点，到了床上，给我舔熊，从上至下，服务的也认真，然后女上，老师很会摇，前面摇，后面摇，然后我选择后入，对着老师的大屁股缴械投降，一起躺着聊聊天，抽了烟，走人。 【优点缺点】优点身材好，🐻好摸，缺点就是课太满，会赶时间 【推荐程度】满分10分 ✅聊天记录已验证 报告有很强的主观性，仅作为出击参考，不要作为出击依据。
欢乐谷报告https://t.me/SZHLG1 【验证留名】牛马 【验证时间】2026.8.10 【老师艺名】哟哟 【课室位置】深圳南山 【联系方式】 @youyouqwbg 【上课价位】1000p 【颜值身材】御姐，人照一致，很温柔 【服务内容】课表一致 【体验细节】下午就开始约了老师的尾课，到了时间根据老师指引，电梯直接上去，开门瞬间，有是有被惊艳到，老师的颜值是我喜欢的，出乎意料真人也好看，身材也很哇塞，颜值好，屁股大，很挺，二弟一下子起立了。交完水费，和老师一起洗澡，在浴室就忍不住吻了起来来到床上，我和老师舌了起来换老师来，口活特别厉害，真的太舒服了，己经忍不住了，随即帮我戴套进入老师的身体，小穴很紧水很多，先正面抽插，然后换到侧面，接着换到后面，一边摸大咪咪一边抽插，换回传教士我抓住她的小脚，开始巨龙撞击，身下是老师在呻吟有极大的满足感顺利出水，老师出来陪洗聊了下日常，然后离开了 【优点缺点】人照一致，女友感，情绪…
🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号：H178465384196 🎰 深圳欢乐谷八月红包补贴 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 乱水禁言，领奖24小时内联系管理壳子： @keezibot 💁 参与情况：97达标 / 313报名 🔋 人品加成：158票 ⚡️× 9 🎅 联系领奖：一地的壳子 1. dd 奖品：300人品 2. moon（七月 满满... 奖品：300出击红包 祝大家心想事成好运连连！
欢乐谷报告https://t.me/SZHLG1 【验证留名】巴西 【验证时间】8🈷️9日 【老师艺名】迪丽米娜 【课室位置】宝安西乡 【联系方式】私聊：@jing8888666 【上课价位】500♻️ 【颜值身材】比照片好看 【服务内容】口爆 【体验细节】看到老师的频道，马上约了时间，见到老师本人感觉比照片好看的多，果断付水费。老师带我去洗澡，洗澡的时候就给我弟弟揉的硬起来了。还给我安排水中萧，洗完澡细心的给我擦干水，还顺便挑逗我一波，让我想直接开干。老师把我推到床上开始了服务，先是🐍吻，然后轻轻舔我的咪咪，给我的咪咪舔的很敏感，然后慢慢的向下去，直接含住我的老弟，我的弟弟直接起立，打在老师脸上。老师的口活非常不错，我直接深喉插进，口的我巨爽。直接被老师秒了。反正爽爆了，想来的ly可以来体验一下，绝对不亏。 【优点缺点】口技一流 【推荐程度】满分10分 ✅聊天记录已验证 报告有很强的主观性，仅作为出击参考，不要作为出击依据。
欢乐谷报告https://t.me/SZHLG1 【验证留名】kwnxmq 【验证时间】8.9 【老师艺名】江晚晴 【课室位置】深圳南山 【联系方式】@jqing99 【上课价位】700P 【颜值身材】9.5 【服务内容】鸳鸯浴#69#无套口#啪啪 【体验细节】刚巧下午在群里看到江晚晴老师的资料 ，然后就约了 ，看着老江晚晴师精致的粉嫩的脸庞早按捺不住了 一进房间我直接主动出击 ，敏感度拉升到极致 小穴紧致水嫩 反馈强烈 微微亲熊就颤栗 深入浅出时会跟节奏收缩 让人难守精关 休息时江晚晴老师也会靠在怀里陪着聊天让我精神上的压力也得到了最后一丝的释放 【优点缺点】无 【推荐程度】满分9.8分 ✅聊天记录已验证 报告有很强的主观性，仅作为出击参考，不要作为出击依据。
欢乐谷报告https://t.me/SZHLG1 【验证留名】孙悟空 【验证时间】8月9日 【老师艺名】迪丽米娜 【课室位置】宝安西乡 【联系方式】私聊：@jing8888666 【上课价位】500♻️ 【颜值身材】妖娆妩媚 【服务内容】口爆 【体验细节】妹妹离我不远，于是果断出击，进门一看，身材无敌，属于前凸后翘的，穿了高跟鞋感觉有170了，实际应该在165这样，说话声音甜甜的很好听，进门笑着叫哥哥，好嫩，好漂亮，交了水费，聊了一会，主动帮我脱一起洗澡，搓背，洗澡都那么仔细，那么做情调，床上服务绝对好。真的是一丝赘肉都没有，身材无敌了，过程无比舒适，嘴巴也很聊天，骚的很。AB面舌尖漫游一遍，舌头软软的，然后毒龙，69，吃蛋蛋，好有振动感，太会玩啦！把我吃的酥麻酥麻的，太爽了。过程还是留给兄弟们冲吧！希望下次还有机会体验老师的绝技，必须推荐，有值又爽！ 【优点缺点】口技一流 【推荐程度】满分10分 ✅聊天记录已验证 报告有很强…
❤1👎1
欢乐谷报告https://t.me/SZHLG1 【验证留名】泼猴 【验证时间】8月8日 【老师艺名】晓晓 【课室位置】宝安#固戌 【联系方式】@xiao168999 【上课价位】499元 【颜值身材】身材完美 【服务内容】口爆 【体验细节】凌晨睡不着打开🛩️，刷到晓晓老师还在开课中，看到老师频道，狼友报告都说老师服务好口活好。马上约了晓晓老师，到了位置，指引上楼，课室好找，楼下出入方便，没有保安，开门见到老师第一眼，身材丰满性感，跟照片没有什么差别。付了钱，搂着我去洗澡，随后回到床上开始服务，按摩，调情，69式，舔🥚，毒🐉，过水，漫游，口活真是一绝。特别是深喉，恨不得把老二吞下去，整套流程下来体验真棒，下次还会来 【优点缺点】口活好 【推荐程度】满分10分 ✅聊天记录已验证 报告有很强的主观性，仅作为出击参考，不要作为出击依据。
欢乐谷报告https://t.me/SZHLG1 【验证留名】kedcx 【验证时间】8.8 【老师艺名】江晚晴 【课室位置】深圳南山 【联系方式】@jqing99 【上课价位】700P 【颜值身材】9.5 【服务内容】鸳鸯浴#69#无套口# 【体验细节】江晚晴老师也是亭亭玉立，腿型很棒，是我喜欢的类型，尤其是看到穿高跟鞋时有一些线条，感觉比例非常棒，和老师聊天也是很享受的事情，各种情绪价值满满的，出门后觉得整个人都轻松了不少，心里有被治愈的感觉 【优点缺点】无 【推荐程度】满分9.8分 ✅聊天记录已验证 报告有很强的主观性，仅作为出击参考，不要作为出击依据。
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @HLGGB1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 985,176 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“欢乐谷【报告榜】” (@HLGGB1), 4,886 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HLGGB1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.