Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

HK 雷氏区块链公司

@HKongcryptolei

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,076subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002422687525
TypeChannel
Username@HKongcryptolei
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 20 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/HKongcryptolei

Growth

2,0762,0802,0787 August 2026 — 2,080 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,080 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,077 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,076 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,075–2,081 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:492,076-1
11 Aug 2026, 08:432,077-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:162,080no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:032,080first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 20 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

591 reactions across 15 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤡36561.8%
💩22638.2%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 591reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2025 to 10 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2025, 03:24 UTC≈5,310 views45 reactionsread 7 August 2026

你call你妈了个b项目呢,0.75e开捆绑到4m,你怎么不把你妈了个b捆在0区块上一块发射了,你可真是你妈了个小畜生

🤡35💩10

8 Jul 2025, 08:28 UTC≈4,920 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

关于刚才开的畜生盘 PT 提前两天就开始在微信群预热说“冷开” “地推” “限购” “收了1000b”,结果在开盘前就上了资料并设定好了时间戳,实际就是为了故意钓冲开盘的人。 从开盘前的数据上来看,狗庄估计几个人合伙拼凑了180b 分发了180个钱包,在昨晚把lp分发到专业开诈骗的gas中转地址,拼凑了1000个地址冒充出真有收了1000b的假象 果不其然,开盘直接秒改90税,关起来批量拉黑,经常在微信圈子玩币的尽量远离这项目一开始宣发的人,其中以“天生勇敢难自弃”及“小薇”为代表。此项目一定跟任何线下是无关的!本人也没有去买。本来就暗淡的行情还要被这帮蛀虫来戏耍,真是丧尽天良!

🤡34💩10

8 May 2025, 12:15 UTC≈4,390 views31 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⏰ 雷氏安全(LEI Security)公告 ⏰ Kecc4k256DB 是 EVM 方法与事件签名的完整数据库与维护工具, 现已开源 动机 - 4byte 提供 EVM 签名查询服务, 但不开放完整数据库下载 - 为满足本地高频查询需求, Kecc4k256DB 支持对 4byte API 数据的完整爬取与增量更新 数据库信息 - 维护时间: 2025-05-08 - 方法签名: 1121550 - 事件签名: 263597 - 文件大小: 84.2 MB (88,338,432 字节) 鸣谢 The data from this service is given free of any license or restrictions on how it may be used. Usage of the API is also granted with the single restriction that your

🤡16💩15

26 Apr 2025, 20:25 UTC≈3,930 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

应该是戏耍了,加仓加到最山顶🤡目前没找到任何官方途径的消息,狗庄+单边0成本光吃手续费?

💩19🤡14

26 Apr 2025, 20:07 UTC≈3,490 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026

他把池子,转到狗妈的多签里面了 应该又是cocoro项目方

💩20🤡15

26 Apr 2025, 20:02 UTC≈3,300 views33 reactionsread 7 August 2026

0xAaA2cf04a50845aB32cac91D7C1182c31D35E804

🤡19💩14

26 Apr 2025, 13:05 UTC≈3,260 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

https://x.com/HKL_HR/status/1916111534784176498

🤡8💩5

31 Mar 2025, 14:10 UTC≈4,700 views32 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

目前, four.meme 平台的代币的 _mode 默认设置为 MODE_TRANSFER_RESTRICTED 这意味着代币从以前的 完全不可转移 变为 仅禁止转移到黑名单地址 ⚠️ 此时, 任何人都可以将持有的代币添加流动性到任何平台 ⚠️ ⚠️ 攻击者可以在 PancakeSwap V2 添加价格倾斜的流动性, 并诱导迁移交易按照错误的价格添加流动性 ⚠️ ✅ 幸运的是, four.meme 平台合约在检查 Pair 的 Reserves 后拒绝迁移 ✅ 🎗 然而, 更加合理的解决方案之一应该是: 1. 仅禁止转移到黑名单地址 的 _mode 不应存在, 在迁移前应当只允许白名单地址转移代币以便迁移 2. 迁移流动性时, 将两种资产转入 Pair 后再 Mint 即可, 由于第一条的限制, 代币在 PancakeSwap V2 的价格不会受到负面干扰

💩25🤡7

31 Mar 2025, 13:46 UTC≈3,280 views54 reactionsread 7 August 2026

FOUR不行把技术外包给雷氏?出了这么多次问题,每个问题都是大专生都能马上修复的,每次都需要24H+以上的时间解决,到底在哪找的小学生技术?

🤡40💩14

31 Mar 2025, 13:28 UTC≈3,130 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

受到影响的迁移交易之一 https://bscscan.com/tx/0xdfd1ddc8ed6f41e62b8c9219ad3e46b3c9bad32165670819ff9519c7b688ef22 注意到在 getReserves() 之后交易被 revert, 推测是 four.meme 平台被之前的攻击留下阴影, 进行了不必要的检查 然而, 对于类 Uniswap V2, 只需要将两种资产转入 Pair 后再 Mint 即可安全地迁移流动性

💩12🤡5

31 Mar 2025, 13:19 UTC≈5,180 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨雷氏安全(LEI Security)温馨提醒🚨 four.meme 代币迁移受到干扰 雷氏安全(LEI Security)发现部分 four.meme 的代币迁移到 PancakeSwap V2 的交易执行失败 攻击交易之一 https://bscscan.com/tx/0x552ab2b6c4caeee758e4cf97eaeb450ec6fa598ce8c8eae6f692b5430fda8210 受到影响的迁移交易之一 https://bscscan.com/tx/0xdfd1ddc8ed6f41e62b8c9219ad3e46b3c9bad32165670819ff9519c7b688ef22 攻击过程 - 攻击者手动创建了 PancakeSwap V2 Pair 并转入 1 Wei WBNB 后执行 sync() - 迁移交易中检查了需要迁移的 PancakeSwap V2 Pair 信息, 拒绝迁移 雷氏

💩15🤡10

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @HKongcryptolei. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,054,865 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HK 雷氏区块链公司” (@HKongcryptolei), 2,076 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HKongcryptolei.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.