Channel
@HKDCCFT
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,582subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 14 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002181840592 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HKDCCFT |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HKDCCFT |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 11:58 | 1,582 | -10 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 09:37 | 1,592 | -5 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 1,597 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 12 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 5 | 83.3% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 October 2025 to 23 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Crypto Market Overview 📍 Another devastating week has passed. The crypto market declined, producing weak bounces. Over the weekend, we saw an attempt at recovery and even a breakout of $87,500, which I didn't expect. STRK fell and logically joined the dynamics of other Layer-2 networks. I'll note the surge in HBAR (+14%), the project is alive and I pointed out in one of the previous reviews that on a bounce - this wo…
❤1👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Crypto Market Overview 📍 Today is Veterans Day in the US, the debt market is closed while the stock market is operating. This is a paradoxical moment when there should be more liquidity in the stock and crypto markets on a holiday than usual. But the market decided otherwise: S&P continued moving up, while BTC is declining again and lost ~3% for the day. The second important point is BTC dominance - if you look at hi…
Crypto Market Overview 📍 Blood and tears on the tape today. A lot of people lost money. Don’t tilt. Don’t try to win it back instantly if you’re down. Use stops. Today’s dump looks on-chain + psychological (crowd liquidations). If there were extra catalysts, we’ll learn post-factum. BTC is notably cheaper on Coinbase than on Binance, which leaves some hope for the Asian session. ✔️ TradFi The S&P is down ~1%—har…
Photo, posted without a caption
Crypto Market Overview 📍 Today was a day of pure disappointment across markets. Crypto is sliding fast, S&P is red, and the dollar is strengthening against this backdrop. Today’s chaos agent was the memecoin JELLYJELLY with a market cap of ~$150M. Trading volume just on Binance futures topped $500M. Recall: the token was removed from Hyperliquid after a blatant manipulation by one player. Since August the token is …
Photo, posted without a caption
Crypto Market Overview 📍 Today, many who went long on Monday got a chance to exit with small losses—but the downtrend persists. BTC neatly tapped the fattest liquidity zone—the area with the largest 20-day volumes—and then rolled over again. Meanwhile, positive TradFi signals have been ignored for a second day. On BNB, an interesting tell: when BTC and ETH started rising (after the U.S. cash open), BNB kept fallin…
Photo, posted without a caption
Crypto Market Overview 📍 Today’s selloff was ruthless. We sliced through multiple support levels where a reversal could’ve formed. This drop was a bit different: heavy selling started early, not just during the U.S. session. In fact, the U.S. was net buying today. With a market this fickle, how do you build rules? If we dump several U.S. sessions in a row, should we expect the next one to be green? 😐 Zcash privacy …
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
Crypto Market Overview 📍 The crypto market is rolling over after a spirited rebound. Overhead resistance zones have formed, several tokens filled prior imbalances, and a wide range/chop is taking shape. ZEC and BANK have stalled. I’m not rushing into shorts on these yet. People are hunting for culprits who profited on the dump. A widely circulated story pins a Hyperliquid wallet to Garret Jin, ex-CEO of the now-cl…
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @HKDCCFT. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CryptoMike Market Insights” (@HKDCCFT), 1,582 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HKDCCFT.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.