The Haunting of Hill House è stata votata come la migliore serie horror di sempre. Secondo un sondaggio della community di IMDb, la serie Netflix creata da Mike Flanagan ha conquistato il primo posto. Il 31% dei votanti l’ha scelta come migliore serie horror di sempre. Inoltre, mantiene un punteggio del 93% dalla critica e del 91% dal pubblico su Rotten Tomatoes. Si tratta di un sondaggio della community di IMDb e…

Channel
Horror Italia 👻
@HIHorrorItalia
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
7,197subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001075951309 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HIHorrorItalia |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HIHorrorItalia |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:04 | 7,197 | -9 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 7,206 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 7,214 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 7,220 | -4 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 7,224 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 7,225 | -8 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:45 | 7,233 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:12 | 7,234 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 7,235 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 7,235 | first reading |
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5.84%
- avg views ÷ 7,197 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 420
- 5 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.074%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 5
- of 26 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 26 (1 July 2026 – 19 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,100 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 20 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 1m 16s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
23 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 73.9% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 17.4% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 4.35% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 4.35% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Siete mai stati all’@horrorpark_official di Fiabilandia? A Rimini, il parco si è trasformato in una vera scare zone con tre livelli di paura, tra ambientazioni horror, attori, inseguimenti e interazioni sempre più estreme. 💬 Voi avreste il coraggio di fare questa esperienza? 🩸 Seguimi per altri video inquietanti 👉🏻 @horroritalia — #HorrorItalia #HorrorPark #Fiabilandia #Rimini
Robin Hood – Il prezzo del sangue prende una delle figure più conosciute e la trasforma in qualcosa di molto più oscuro. Dimenticate l’eroe delle classiche versioni di Robin Hood: qui ci troviamo davanti a un racconto sporco, violento e profondamente cupo. 🎬 Ma funziona davvero questa rilettura più cupa? Nel carosello trovate la mia recensione completa. 💬 Lo avete già visto? Che ne pensate? 🩸 Seguimi per altre st…
Secondo i racconti diventati virali nelle ultime settimane, Dulal Giri Ji Maharaj avrebbe scelto di vivere così come forma di devozione religiosa. È un sadhu, ovvero un uomo che rinuncia alla vita materiale per dedicarsi completamente alla spiritualità e alla preghiera. La pratica che avrebbe intrapreso è conosciuta come Khada Tapasya: un’antica forma di penitenza in cui il praticante si impegna a rimanere sempre in…
In occasione dell’uscita di Ice Cream Man, abbiamo avuto l’opportunità di intervistare il regista del film Eli Roth insieme ai ragazzi di @lascimmiapensa. Gli abbiamo chiesto: “Il cast è composto da molti bambini coinvolti in scene violente e disturbanti. Com’è stato dirigere un cast così giovane?” Ecco la sua risposta. 📽️ Ice Cream Man uscirà al cinema il 29 ottobre! 💬 Lo guarderai? 🩸 Seguimi per altre intervi…
❤1
Dietro una fotografia si nasconde molto più di quello che vediamo. Alcune di queste fotografie sono diventate simboli di tragedie che hanno segnato la storia, altre raccontano storie di coraggio, perdita e speranza che ancora oggi continuano a emozionare milioni di persone. 💬 Quale immagine ti è rimasta impressa? 🩸 Seguimi per altre storie 👉🏻 @horroritalia — #HorrorItalia #FotografieStoriche #StorieVere #Storia …
Nel 1983 Rick Charls entrò nella storia lanciandosi da una torre alta 52,4 metri, stabilendo un record mondiale di tuffo che, ancora oggi, nessuno è riuscito a battere. Durante la caduta raggiunse una velocità di oltre 115 km/h ed eseguì addirittura un triplo salto mortale prima di entrare in acqua. A quella velocità l’impatto con l’acqua può essere devastante. Il suo corpo subì una decelerazione di circa 10 G, ma …
Queste fotografie sembrano momenti qualunque. Un autografo firmato a un fan, un sorriso davanti a una macchina fotografica, una giornata di lavoro o una passeggiata nel giardino di casa. Eppure, nessuna di queste persone sapeva che quello sarebbe stato uno degli ultimi scatti della propria vita. È proprio questo a rendere queste immagini così inquietanti: sembrano perfettamente normali, finché non si conosce la st…
C’è un motivo se così tante persone stanno aspettando Hokum. Dietro il film c’è Damian Mc Carthy, il regista di Caveat e Oddity due horror che negli ultimi anni hanno conquistato pubblico e critica grazie alla loro atmosfera opprimente e a una tensione costruita senza ricorrere ai classici jumpscare. Con Hokum Mc Carthy racconta una storia ispirata al folklore irlandese, tra antiche superstizioni, leggende e presen…
❤3
Ghostface è una delle maschere più iconiche della storia del cinema horror. Eppure, per poco, non l’abbiamo mai vista sul grande schermo. Secondo il racconto più noto, Wes Craven e la produzione si imbatterono nella maschera durante un sopralluogo per le location di Scream. Era un semplice articolo di Halloween prodotto da Fun World. Craven se ne innamorò immediatamente e decise che quello sarebbe stato il volto di …
❤1
A oltre 8.500 metri di quota, lungo una delle vie più frequentate verso la cima dell’Everest, per oltre vent’anni è rimasto il corpo di un alpinista conosciuto come Green Boots. Secondo la ricostruzione più accreditata, si trattava di Tsewang Paljor, membro di una spedizione indiana sorpreso dalla devastante tempesta del 1996, una delle più tragiche nella storia della montagna. Il suo corpo, riconoscibile dagli sca…
Da quando Obsession è uscito, i fan continuano a trovare nuovi dettagli nascosti. Ma ce n’è una che sta facendo discutere più di tutte. Secondo questa teoria, Nikki non sarebbe posseduta da un demone, ma dallo spirito di Sandy, il gatto di Bear. Una spiegazione che, per alcuni, renderebbe molto più sensati diversi comportamenti del personaggio durante il film: gli occhi che brillano nel buio, i movimenti felini, il …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @HIHorrorItalia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 3
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 3
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@HIHorrorItalia named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 37 posts, 8 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 21 August 2026 – 21 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Horror Italia 👻” (@HIHorrorItalia), 7,197 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HIHorrorItalia.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.