Channel
@HBatakus
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
296subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001240434715 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HBatakus |
| Created | 27 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HBatakus |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 01:56 | 296 | -4 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 300 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 301 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 303 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:33 | 304 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 303 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 303 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 30 June 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
527 reactions across 19 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 130 | 24.7% | |
| 🤣 | 95 | 18.0% | |
| 🤡 | 89 | 16.9% | |
| ⚡ | 46 | 8.73% | |
| 👏 | 43 | 8.16% | |
| 👌 | 42 | 7.97% | |
| ❤ | 38 | 7.21% | |
| 🌚 | 17 | 3.23% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 3.04% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 1.14% | |
| 🤬 | 4 | 0.759% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.19% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 527 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2023 to 6 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
To say that people who don't like Trump or are doubtful about him have been "proven wrong" today is silly because his electability wasn't the issue. His lack of implementing anything meaningful during his first term and being overall counterintuitive was the issue. Making libs sad doesn't really suffice for atoning for any of that and so far that's all he's done. Sorry but again, gauging your "wins" based on how mad…
🔥14👍9
Shabbos Kestenbaum (lol) was invited to speak at the RNC about how he is suing Harvard for allowing antisemitic speech. Just a week ago he was affirming himself on Twitter as a Democrat. They literally invited him to the convention just to say "antisemitism bad"
🌚17🔥2
I don't care if you're going to vote for Trump. I'm ambivalent, really. I don't care if you're encouraging other people to vote for him "because he's the better option." But there's a difference between that and valorizing him, describing him as the panacea for White grievances, because then people are going to treat his word like gospel and that I do have an issue with. He's a staunch zionist, a disavower of expli…
👍23👎1
I was actually shocked when I saw this. I kind of thought these people had mostly moved on to trying to hold Trump accountable but I'm seeing this take coming from multiple accounts. It reeks of the same level of delusion as when conservatives would tweet during the BLM riots about how it was "Biden's America" even though Trump was still the sitting president. Pathetic really
👍19
this is so beautifully written
❤13😢6
Leftists see Trump as a proxy and sense of hope for all self-respecting White people. White Americans understand this, so they take slights against him very personally. The problem is that leftists see Trump as this proxy because of a delusional mythos version of him. The right is capable of acknowledging this, yet they compartmentalize it when they interpret slights (which were only motivated by the mythos) against…
👏14
Throughout his presidency and even now, every moment of reinvigoration for Trump has come from conservatives' contrarian instincts. They correlate progressive chimpouts to him being effective. To the majority of the right, leftists getting mad at Trump atones for his lack of tangible accomplishments. Look at how he is lionized all over again by people on the right who were calling him a traitor 24 hours ago just bec…
👍12
There seems to be a disconnect where people don't understand that: >compromising your movement in favor of optics >abandoning optics altogether >making your movement as palatable to YOUR people as possible without conceding any of your principles are 3 different things. Favorable imagery is a good thing as long as your message stays consistent. It has nothing to do with appealing to the ruling class or staying with…
👍16❤5
Over the last 6 months, I've typed out about a dozen different novel length posts on here that I ended up just storing in my drafts. I've been in this weird loop where I always find a way to nitpick every thought and determine it to be wrong or contradictory to something more compelling. Even on Twitter, I can't bring myself to post anything remotely interesting. I might start writing about other topics until it pas…
❤15⚡3
Makes a poll. Provides only two options. The second option implies that everything Israel does is justified. So he intentionally makes the only alternative as provocative as possible so that he can cry about the results. Very typical behavior
👍23🤣20
This is an ad being pushed by Israeli propagandists. Apparently it's meant to earn the sympathies of Europeans
🤣36🤡11🤬3⚡1👍1
"You're on the same side as (insert bad people) on this issue so you need to reevaluate your position" Everyone knows how weak this point is when it's wielded against them. But it's funny how easily people can dupe themselves into invoking it when they're in hysterics
👏14
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @HBatakus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hypocrisy Enthusiast” (@HBatakus), 296 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HBatakus.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.