Channel

𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗦𝗛 𝗢𝗣𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗦 – 𝗡𝗜𝗙𝗧𝗬 & 𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗞𝗡𝗜𝗙𝗧𝗬

@HARSH_OPTIONS_NIFTY_BANKNIFTY

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,756subscribers

-4,409 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

Engagement

102 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 102 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

Showing the 12 most recent of 102 posts we hold for @HARSH_OPTIONS_NIFTY_BANKNIFTY. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝗛𝗔𝗥𝗦𝗛 𝗢𝗣𝗧𝗜𝗢𝗡𝗦 – 𝗡𝗜𝗙𝗧𝗬 & 𝗕𝗔𝗡𝗞𝗡𝗜𝗙𝗧𝗬” (@HARSH_OPTIONS_NIFTY_BANKNIFTY), 3,756 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HARSH_OPTIONS_NIFTY_BANKNIFTY.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.