ุจุทููู ุฑูู ( 238 ) ๐
๐8๐ฅ2๐1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges

Channel
@HAFLA_91
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry
6,734subscribers
+47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002241475530 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @HAFLA_91 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/HAFLA_91 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 6,734 | -15 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:10 | 6,749 | +61 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:42 | 6,688 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:31 | 6,687 | first reading |
28 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 28 (25 July 2026 โ 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 57,655 |
| Reactions total | 784 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel โ not this channelโs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramโs own rounded chrome, so it carries no โ mark.
784 reactions across 28 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ฅ | 197 | 25.1% | |
| โคโ๐ฅ | 182 | 23.2% | |
| โค | 178 | 22.7% | |
| ๐ | 95 | 12.1% | |
| โก | 20 | 2.55% | |
| ๐ | 19 | 2.42% | |
| ๐ | 14 | 1.79% | |
| ๐ | 9 | 1.15% | |
| ๐ | 8 | 1.02% | |
| ๐ | 7 | 0.893% | |
| ๐ | 7 | 0.893% | |
| ๐จโ๐ป | 5 | 0.638% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 0.51% | |
| ๐ป | 4 | 0.51% | |
| ๐ | 4 | 0.51% | |
| ๐ฑ | 4 | 0.51% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 4 | 0.51% | |
| ๐ | 3 | 0.383% | |
| ๐ค | 3 | 0.383% | |
| ๐ซก | 3 | 0.383% | |
| 11 further kinds | 14 | 1.79% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 784reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ bought with money โ on a post by @HAFLA_91. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ุจุทููู ุฑูู ( 238 ) ๐
๐8๐ฅ2๐1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
REGION THE LEGACY CUP ๐ ORGANIZED BY REGION๐ช๐บ PRIZEPOOL โ 70๐ต STREAMER ๐บ ๐ฑ 7ALFA ๐ฑ ASHOR ๐ดโโ ๏ธ START | DATE โ 15.08.2026
โค6๐ฅ3โก1โคโ๐ฅ1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
Who Will Win ? ๐
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
๐ฅ8โคโ๐ฅ2๐1๐ค1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
The Best Challenge Today ๐ FAHD ๐ฎ๐ถ vs 90 FPS ๐น๐ท BO5 โ 1 Hour โฑ
๐ฅ20โคโ๐ฅ3โค2โก1๐1๐ณ1๐1๐1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
ุจููุง ุชุญุฏูุงุช ุงูููู ุ ๐๐ฅ
๐ฅ19โค3โคโ๐ฅ3๐1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
ุชุตุจุญูุง ุนูู ุฎูุฑ ุงุตุนุจ ููู ( 8 ุณุงุนุงุช ) ุชุนููู ๐โค๏ธ
โค21๐5โคโ๐ฅ3๐1๐1๐1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
Who Will Win ? ๐
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
โคโ๐ฅ13โค9๐3
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
Challenge For Today ๐ KOVANO vs 90 FPS ๐น๐ท BO5 โ After 10 Mintes ๐ฅ
โคโ๐ฅ21๐ฅ7๐4โก1โค1๐1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
Next Challenge ๐ FAHD ๐ฎ๐ถ vs 90 ๐น๐ท BO3 ๐
โคโ๐ฅ29โค8๐ฑ3โก1๐1๐ซก1๐1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
New CHALLANGE ๐ DARK ๐ฏ๐ด vs 90 FPS ๐น๐ท BO5 ๐ 30 Min โฑ
๐ฅ29โค5๐จโ๐ป4โก1โคโ๐ฅ1๐ณ1๐ฟ1๐คก1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
ุชุญุฏู ุ ๐๐ฅ
โคโ๐ฅ10๐4โก2๐1๐ฅ1๐1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
ููุง ุฎูููุง ูููุนูุง ๐ฅ๐
๐19โคโ๐ฅ3โค2โก1๐1
Signed 7AFLA Challenges
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @HAFLA_91. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions โ Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Who Will Win ? ๐
The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Who Will Win ? ๐
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank โ 82,854 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ7AFLA CHALLENGES ๐โ (@HAFLA_91), 6,734 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/HAFLA_91.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.