Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gynecology & Obstetrics Updates

Channel

Gynecology & Obstetrics Updates

@GynObsUpdates

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,482subscribers

+404 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001428162064
TypeChannel
Username@GynObsUpdates
DescriptionAll the atest articles, research and news from worlds leading Gynecology and Obstetrics Journals. Discussion group https://t.me/Professional_Medical_Discussion
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded26 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/GynObsUpdates

Topic

Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,07811,48211,28026 August 2026 — 11,078 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,087 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,097 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,103 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,114 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,120 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,123 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,136 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,158 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,175 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,192 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,205 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,225 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,232 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,307 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,353 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,384 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,392 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,404 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,410 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,419 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,432 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,422 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,427 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,438 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,441 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,447 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,449 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,454 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,456 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,457 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,462 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,469 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,472 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,482 subscribers26 August 20263 November 2026
35 measurements spanning 68 days, net +404. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,017–11,543 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 05:5011,482+10
2 Nov 2026, 04:1011,472+3
1 Nov 2026, 01:1011,469+7
31 Oct 2026, 02:3711,462+5
29 Oct 2026, 23:5611,457+1
27 Oct 2026, 20:5711,456+2
26 Oct 2026, 19:2111,454+5
25 Oct 2026, 16:1711,449+2
24 Oct 2026, 19:2511,447+6
23 Oct 2026, 16:5811,441+3
22 Oct 2026, 15:4111,438+11
21 Oct 2026, 07:3111,427+5
20 Oct 2026, 03:4711,422-10
19 Oct 2026, 01:1911,432+13
17 Oct 2026, 00:2911,419+9
15 Oct 2026, 20:5511,410+6
14 Oct 2026, 19:0811,404+12
13 Oct 2026, 07:2811,392+8
9 Oct 2026, 05:5911,384+31
4 Oct 2026, 15:5811,353first reading

Engagement

53 posts held, back to 24 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.01%
avg views ÷ 11,482 subscribers
Avg views / post
461
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.207%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 53 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held53 (24 August 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total10,603
Reactions total2
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 07:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈37
Links
≈9,970

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 53 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 53 most recent posts we hold, published 24 August 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2026, 23:25 UTC142 viewsread 4 November 2026

Construction of a clinical model for early prediction of gestational diabetes mellitus based on women of increased maternal age singleton pregnant women https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.71371?af=R

3 Nov 2026, 23:24 UTC144 viewsread 4 November 2026

Association between urine protein‐to‐creatinine ratio and postpartum resistant hypertension in patients with severe preeclampsia: A retrospective cohort study https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.71471?af=R

3 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC269 viewsread 4 November 2026

[Original research] Child developmental scores are similar after maternal COVID-19 mRNA vaccination https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapediatrics/article-abstract/2856087 Original research in JAMA Pediatr. Source publication date: 2 November 2026. Prospective cohort, 217 matched pairs: ASQ-3 scores met prespecified equivalence limits at 18–30 months. Observational, questionnaire-based developmental assessment; doe…

1 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC526 viewsread 4 November 2026

Lessons learned from pregnant women's experiences with COVID‐19 vaccination in Brazil: A qualitative study https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.71466?af=R

1 Nov 2026, 13:03 UTC505 viewsread 4 November 2026

Can day 3 serum luteinizing hormone level prospectively predict ovulation? https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.71475?af=R

31 Oct 2026, 18:09 UTC561 viewsread 4 November 2026

[Original research] Maternal energy-protein supplements do not improve later infant growth in a Nepal trial https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2026.101614 Original research in Am J Clin Nutr. Source publication date: 29 October 2026. MINT factorial trial; 1,568 infants; supplementation during pregnancy or lactation did not improve length-for-age at six months. This does not negate established birth-outcome indications…

31 Oct 2026, 00:37 UTC615 viewsread 4 November 2026

Interpregnancy interval and adverse live‐birth outcomes after a non‐live‐birth prior pregnancy: A 2024 U.S. population‐based analysis https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.71477?af=R

31 Oct 2026, 00:36 UTC546 viewsread 4 November 2026

Factors associated with severe postpartum hemorrhage in women with posterior low‐lying placenta and prior cesarean: A prospective population‐based study https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.71445?af=R

31 Oct 2026, 00:35 UTC463 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Gender‐based violence in obstetric and gynecologic care: Secondary victimization, ethics, and trauma‐informed practice‐scoping review https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.71405?af=R

❤1

31 Oct 2026, 00:34 UTC431 viewsread 4 November 2026

Maternal nutritional screening and risk of small‐for‐gestational‐age birth in Vietnamese pregnancies: A prospective comparison of the FIGO nutrition checklist, pre‐pregnancy BMI, and mid‐upper arm circumference https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.71420?af=R

31 Oct 2026, 00:33 UTC410 viewsread 4 November 2026

Association of fetal epicardial fat thickness with adverse perinatal outcomes and assessment of fetal cardiac function in fetal growth restriction https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.71481?af=R

31 Oct 2026, 00:32 UTC399 viewsread 4 November 2026

Pregnancy of unknown location with persistently rising serum β‐human chorionic gonadotropin with villous trophoblastic tissue in the vaginal wall https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijgo.71438?af=R

Showing the 12 most recent of 53 posts we hold for @GynObsUpdates. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UpToDate in Ob/Gyne Library
@UpToDate_Sabry · 35,998
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 16 September 2026
PLAB, MRCP, MRCS, NBME
@Plab_MRcp · 69,605
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 26 August 2026
doctor's notebook
@doctorsnotebooks · 25,680
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 16 September 2026
Dr.G.Bhanu Prakash - Official👨‍⚕️
@bhanuprakashdr · 139,920
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 26 August 2026
Cardiology Updates
@Cardiology_Updates · 20,444
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 30 September 2026
Pediatrics & Neonatology Journals [Ahmed Manfy]
@AhmedManfyJournals · 34,194
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 20 September 2026
Internal Medicine Videos & books
@medicinevideoss · 103,127
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 26 August 2026
MRCP Part2 Material 2025
@mrcpmaterial2 · 20,725
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 27 September 2026
Medical History🔍🩺
@hist_first · 21,803
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 25 September 2026
𝖉𝖗. 𝖉𝖊𝖇𝖔𝖑
@Debolteam · 18,905
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 October 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gynecology & Obstetrics Updates” (@GynObsUpdates), 11,482 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GynObsUpdates.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.