现在有个位……😍

Channel
七七De小屋🛖
@GxQiQi88
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
846subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 4 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004311307954 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GxQiQi88 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 4 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GxQiQi88 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Sept 2026, 19:42 | 846 | -15 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:17 | 861 | +7 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:39 | 854 | +21 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 833 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 29.8%
- avg views ÷ 846 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 252
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.86%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (1 August 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 756 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Sept 2026, 20:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 75.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
回老家一个月,今天下午,开课……
👍3
现在有🈳️哟……宝子们……明天就休息了……休息几天……😃💋💋💋
😄三点开,可以提前预🈷️。🈶️🈳️🉑️🈷️
宝宝们:六点半后可以预🈷️排位哟……
❤4
报告模板 反馈报告 上课时间: 8.4 验证留名: 路过就出击 所在位置:大朗 老师名称:大朗~七七 @qiqi18889 上课价格:700p 妹子年龄:18 妹子容貌: 10 妹子身材:10 服务态度:10 环境设备:9.7 自由评论: 其实我很少写报告的,今天我就直接说体验,非常的OK,作为大朗的老司机,在看到七七老师的频道,被老师的的视频照片吸引到,直接到我的审美点了,非常满意,约好了时间,见面就很惊艳,非常的有气质又不失时尚与颜值,真人比照片还要漂亮,七七是我见过老师中又带有服务,性格非常好的老师,有沟通,有交流情绪感拉的满满的,身材非常匀称,要胸有胸,小屁股翘翘的,口活很好,直接给兄弟我口爽了,爱爱的时候配合度也很高,简直爱了,其实cj就这样,无非就是释放一下内心的压力,放松一下心情,正好七七老师都能提供,值得推荐,兄弟们直接cj就对了 公开榜防失联 @tiantianfacai 公开榜 @vcaaa 同…
❤4🔥1
哟哟哟
现在有🈳️位
🤣🤣🤣
昨天发的,😄……
开课了……来来来,开启预🈷️……⌚️⌚️⌚️
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @GxQiQi88. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“七七De小屋🛖” (@GxQiQi88), 846 subscribers as measured 29 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GxQiQi88.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.