Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ɢᴜʀᴍᴀɴ

@GurmanDexy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

437subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002607603484
TypeChannel
Username@GurmanDexy
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GurmanDexy

Growth

434437435.56 August 2026 — 435 subscribers7 August 2026 — 434 subscribers15 August 2026 — 437 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 434–437 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 14:09437+3
7 Aug 2026, 08:40434-1
6 Aug 2026, 22:46435first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.5%
avg views ÷ 437 subscribers
Avg views / post
247
11 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.4%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
11
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (22 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,714
Reactions total363
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

363 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 628734905348731974513336.6%
custom 537982189690684623712935.5%
custom 62893515862840470645214.3%
custom 6287168123695009363226.06%
custom 537962218092758216882.20%
custom 537965973612161924161.65%
custom 628940506292184945341.10%
custom 538006481166717334030.826%
custom 628942005665267997530.826%
custom 628962965105672472130.826%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 363reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 11 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GurmanDexy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC114 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

•••Они решили все вместе порыдать❤️ – Короче, с покадровкой я наконец-то закончил. Остался только монтаж и текст... А текста там, блять, дохуя. Так что реакция, скорее всего, выйдет 8 или 9 августа🤩

custom 628716812369500936322custom 62894050629218494534custom 62893515862840470643custom 62896296510567247213

6 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC144 views32 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Почему он такой пуся😠

custom 628734905348731974531custom 62894200566526799751

6 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC135 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Порно прохождение гейской фурри скоро будет🥺

custom 628734905348731974515custom 62893515862840470642custom 62894200566526799751

6 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC139 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 ••• Ахуительная работа от ~ @Yanixtiktik – Миллионный раз спасибо за ваши прекрасные работы! Кажется, мне уже даже расписывать долго не надо, чтобы подтвердить свои слова о том, что это ахуенно. Не так ли?🤩 – Этот арт однозначно пойдёт в следующую партию на распечатку. Стена фан-артов явно скоро пополнится ещё одной фиолетовой чмоней, и я этому только рад.🤩 ••• Нет, серьёзно... Почему в последнее время р

custom 628734905348731974514custom 62893515862840470643

5 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC180 views40 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Короче, реакция выйдет где-то через 2–3 дня. Сейчас я уже закончил больше половины, осталось ещё 6 видео. Их я добью завтра, а потом начнётся монтаж на этой шайтан-машине🤩 Но не забывайте, что я пиздабол №1 на районе, так что со сроками я ещё могу наебаться🤩

custom 628935158628404706437custom 62873490534873197453

5 Aug 2026, 14:11 UTC188 views51 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну вы посмотрите на эту стесняшку🤩

custom 628734905348731974543custom 62893515862840470647custom 62894200566526799751

3 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC316 views27 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 •••Ахеренная работа от ~ @Antlicson – Стоит ли мне вообще говорить, насколько я в восторге, чтобы вы хотя бы примерно поняли, что я сейчас чувствую??? – У меня просто нет слов, чтобы описать, насколько мне нравится этот арт. И сама идея, и рисовка — всё просто ахуенно. ••• Это однозначно пойдёт в следующую партию на распечатку, потому что грех не повесить такую красоту. – И, боже... какой же всё-таки Эйлар

custom 628734905348731974527

2 Aug 2026, 12:11 UTC317 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍🤍 – Ахуенная работа от человека по имени Лайт🤩 – Я всё ещё не перестаю восхищаться вашими работами. Мой словарный запас для похвалы уже давным-давно закончился. Я слишком часто всех нахваливаю, но это не мешает мне ещё раз сказать, что я в полном восторге от этой работы. Она реально ахуенная! Продолжай совершенствовать навыки в том же духе!🤩 – Кстати, Лайт — начинающий гача-реакционер и по совместительству

custom 537982189690684623724custom 53796221809275821681

1 Aug 2026, 20:33 UTC287 views27 reactions5 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️На кого ⭐️⭐️из персонажей ⭐️⭐️ похожи вы? •°●◇°●○~•°•□•°•~○●°◇●°• [⭐️]-Я уже очень давно не выкладывала ничего более-менее адекватного. Хотя... это тоже адекватным назвать сложно, но похуй🤩 •°●◇°●○~•°•□•°•~○●°◇●°• [⭐️]-Короче говоря, я наконец-то полностью разобралась с лором. Точнее, он уже весь продуман, но мне, блядь, настолько лень всё это расписывать, что пока будете получать его по кусочкам. •°●◇°●○~•°•□•°•

custom 537982189690684623725custom 53796221809275821682

30 Jul 2026, 07:05 UTC373 views53 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

– Спустя несколько дней я наконец-то принялась доделывать реакцию по Verity🤩 • Где-то 4–5 минут уже сделаны в Gacha Life 2, а остальная часть, как и раньше, будет сделана в Gacha Nebula. Как оказалось, Gacha Life 2 всё-таки не для меня. • Так что ждите, реакция уже совсем скоро выйдет🤩

custom 537982189690684623744custom 53796221809275821685custom 53800648116671733403custom 53796597361216192411

22 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC521 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

⭐️⭐️Это чмо ⭐️⭐️ наконец-то ⭐️⭐️ добавило новые арты🤩 [⭐️]-Стена с новым Гурманом и его семейкой теперь полностью заполнена, и я, блядь, вообще не ебу, куда теперь клеить будущие арты. Похоже, скоро уже придётся на стены херачить🤩 [⭐️]-Заодно решил не обделять вниманием и арты со старыми версиями Гурмана. Их хоть и не так много, но они мне тоже очень дороги🤩 [⭐️]-Спасибо вам огромное за все арты. Мне правда безумн

custom 537982189690684623736custom 53796597361216192415

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @GurmanDexy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 673,610 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ɢᴜʀᴍᴀɴ” (@GurmanDexy), 437 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GurmanDexy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.