Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for الإعلام المقاوم

Channel

الإعلام المقاوم

@Guraa2019

On this record: Topic · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,809subscribers

-356 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001311742940
TypeChannel
Username@Guraa2019
Created6 February 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Guraa2019

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,8096,1655,9876 August 2026 — 6,165 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,165 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,159 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,139 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,125 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,113 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,105 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,091 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,075 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,066 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,055 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,042 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,013 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,008 subscribers18 September 2026 — 5,993 subscribers26 September 2026 — 5,979 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,941 subscribers11 October 2026 — 5,919 subscribers14 October 2026 — 5,901 subscribers17 October 2026 — 5,892 subscribers19 October 2026 — 5,884 subscribers23 October 2026 — 5,869 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,852 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,846 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,832 subscribers3 November 2026 — 5,826 subscribers5 November 2026 — 5,809 subscribers6 August 20265 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 91 days, net -356. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,756–6,218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 22:465,809-17
3 Nov 2026, 01:175,826-6
31 Oct 2026, 07:555,832-14
28 Oct 2026, 11:565,846-6
25 Oct 2026, 17:585,852-17
23 Oct 2026, 04:405,869-15
19 Oct 2026, 23:115,884-8
17 Oct 2026, 09:545,892-9
14 Oct 2026, 16:405,901-18
11 Oct 2026, 04:165,919-22
5 Oct 2026, 04:585,941-38
26 Sept 2026, 23:575,979-14
18 Sept 2026, 03:405,993-15
13 Sept 2026, 22:396,008-5
10 Sept 2026, 01:556,013-29
5 Sept 2026, 02:216,042-13
1 Sept 2026, 07:146,055-11
29 Aug 2026, 12:486,066-9
26 Aug 2026, 08:146,075-16
23 Aug 2026, 01:366,091first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.75%
avg views ÷ 5,809 subscribers
Avg views / post
160
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held38 (28 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total3,192
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 16:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 51s
Average length
1m 21s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

89 reactions across 28 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🫡4550.6%
😢1921.3%
🔥1719.1%
👍44.49%
👌22.25%
💯22.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 01:16 UTC84 viewsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @Q7octoberVideo

🔻 جيل يعقبه جيل.. حتى النصر والتحرير

3 Nov 2026, 08:58 UTC124 viewsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @aknaafVideo

🔻كليب دموع الصادقين #أكناف.. نبض الأرض المباركة تـابـعـونـا عـبـر: t.me/aknaaf

2 Nov 2026, 14:03 UTC182 viewsread 4 November 2026
Video

في ذكرى وعد بلفور نجدد الوعد عليه بالـ four: 1- لا صلح 2- لا استسلام 3- لا تنازل 4- لا تطبيع

2 Nov 2026, 12:54 UTC140 viewsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @aknaafPhoto

📌وعدٌ باطل لن يغيّر حقيقة الأرض الأرض لأهلها، والهوية لا تُمحى 2 تشرين الثاني / نوفمبر 1917 ذكرى وعد بلفور المشؤوم #أكناف.. نبض الأرض المباركة تـابـعـونـا عـبـر: t.me/aknaaf

2 Nov 2026, 02:53 UTC137 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @regalsadqVideo

#شاهد_حصري شاهد العمل الجهادي ، الكليب الحصري "كتيبتي مصعب" ، والذي يتضمن مشاهد تُعرض لأول مرة للقادة العِظام ومشاهد التصدي داخل الكتيبة.. كتيبة الصحابي الجليل مصعب بن عمير ◄ إنتــــــاج: منصة رجال صدقوا https://t.me/regalsadq #ما_خفي_أعظم

🫡3

1 Nov 2026, 18:09 UTC184 viewsread 4 November 2026
Photo

اجتماع القرن.. هذا الاجتماع هو الأهم لقادة الأمة العربية والإسلامية في القرن الحالي.. هذه هي القمة العربية الإسلامية التي تمثل الأمة كما يحب أن يراها ملياري مسلم.. هذا المجلس هو المجلس العسكري الأعلى لقادة الجيوش العربية والإسلامية الحقيقيون، الذين يحملون هم أمتهم ومصلحة شعوبها.. هذا المؤتمر هو المؤتمر الأصدق لعلماء ودعاة ونخب الأمة لمدارسة حفظ جناب التوحيد وسلامة العقيدة والدفاع عن المقدسات. هذا الاجتماع الذي م…

31 Oct 2026, 18:03 UTC205 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026

أيقونة الرعب.. "الشبح" الذي حيّر إسرائيل شكّل محمد الضيف، القائد العام لكتائب القسام، حالة استثنائية في الصراع مع الاحتلال، فعلى مدى نحو ثلاثة عقود، تصدّر قائمة المطلوبين الأولى لإسرائيل، وارتبط اسمه بمطاردة استخباراتية فاشلة، حتى لُقّب بـ"القائد الشبح" و"ذي الأرواح السبعة"، في اعتراف إسرائيلي ضمني بالعجز عن الوصول إليه. فن التخفي.. رجل الظل لم يكن اختفاء الضيف مجرد إجراء تكتيكي، بل عقيدة أمنية: - غياب شبه تام عن …

🫡3

31 Oct 2026, 13:52 UTC166 views1 reactionsread 4 November 2026

شهداؤنا.. لماذا نحسبهم من أهل الكرامة؟ ▪️ إذا تأملت مثلًا في سيرة مولانا أبي خالد الضيف -قدَّس الله روحه- ستجد أنه أمضى قرابة ثلثي عمره في مقارعة المحتل، حتى لقي ربه شهيدًا في معركة "طوفان الأقصى". ▪️ رغم طول السنين وتقلباتها، فقد استقام الرجل وإخوانه على أمر الله، وثبتوا على ذروة سنام الإسلام حتى أتاهم اليقين. وهذا يجعلهم -فيما نحسب- من أهل الكرامة، فإن أعظم الكرامة لزوم الاستقامة، كما يقول ابن تيمية. د. بلال جم…

💯1

31 Oct 2026, 12:59 UTC182 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

هذا هو الرجل الذي اتهموه بأنه لا يعبأ بشعبه .. الآن بعد ٥ سنوات نرى وجهاً آخر لم يره أحدنا يوماً .. الرجل يبكي دمعاً بوقف اطلاق النـ.. ـار عام ٢٠٢١ بعدما وضعوا حدا لعربدة المحتل في الأقصى والشيخ جراح.. هؤلاء رجالٌ يريدون أن يصنعوا الحياة .. لكن يصنعوها كريمةً .. لا يرضوا عيش الذل ولا طعم الهوان .. هذا الذي يعجز عن فهمه من باعوا كرامتهم بثمن بخسً .. وقبلوا بفتات الحياة .. ثم أطلقوا ألسنتهم في عرض أشرف أهل الأرض لا ت…

🔥3🫡1

31 Oct 2026, 11:12 UTC151 views4 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Forwarded from @Balagh1PS

🔻 شهداؤنا.. لماذا نحسبهم من أهل الكرامة؟ ▪️ إذا تأملت مثلًا في سيرة مولانا أبي خالد الضيف -قدَّس الله روحه- ستجد أنه أمضى قرابة ثلثي عمره في مقارعة المحتل، حتى لقي ربه شهيدًا في معركة "طوفان الأقصى". ▪️ رغم طول السنين وتقلباتها، فقد استقام الرجل وإخوانه على أمر الله، وثبتوا على ذروة سنام الإسلام حتى أتاهم اليقين. وهذا يجعلهم -فيما نحسب- من أهل الكرامة، فإن أعظم الكرامة لزوم الاستقامة، كما يقول ابن تيمية. ✍️ د. بلا…

🫡4

31 Oct 2026, 08:22 UTC174 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

رسالة ذهبية ووصية جهادية لأمة الإسلام وشباب الأمة من سيد البلاد، وقائد جيشها المظفر محمد الضيف "أبو خالد" تقبله الله.

🫡3😢2

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @Guraa2019. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

كتائب القسام - الإعلام العسكري
@alqessam1 · 38,379
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 15 September 2026
قناة القدس اليوم الفضائية
@alqudstodaytv · 12,420
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 23 August 2026
هذه سبيلي ادعو الى الله على بصيرة
@a_a_o9 · 40,409
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 28 August 2026
الميدان الأن
@Almidanalan · 18,880
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 30 September 2026
الصحفي معاذ الهمص
@moathalhams · 20,788
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 September 2026
🇵🇸 عبري نيوز 🇵🇸
@Hebrew2024media · 84,028
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 August 2026
فلسطين أون لاين
@pl24online · 23,023
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
المصور الصحفي حازم مزيد
@hazemmezyed · 18,488
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 5 October 2026
محمود اللوح -صحفي من غزة
@pressm989 · 20,579
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 24 September 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“الإعلام المقاوم” (@Guraa2019), 5,809 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Guraa2019.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.