6 measurements spanning 11 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,928–2,997 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Aug 2026, 04:22
2,940
-49
14 Aug 2026, 23:08
2,989
+9
11 Aug 2026, 09:34
2,980
+44
8 Aug 2026, 06:57
2,936
-29
7 Aug 2026, 13:31
2,965
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:32
2,965
first reading
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 8 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
2.60%
avg views ÷ 2,940 subscribers
Avg views / post
76.5
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
79.1%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
17 (8 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
153
Reactions total
121
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 11s
Average length
24s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,980 reactions across 17 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
751
37.9%
🍓
270
13.6%
👍
229
11.6%
⚡
159
8.03%
custom 5246895747177162557
132
6.67%
😍
93
4.70%
custom 5260571601652428566
85
4.29%
custom 5418236556848674890
46
2.32%
custom 5384549749661641183
40
2.02%
custom 5444867029121132838
35
1.77%
custom 5393510185312470986
31
1.57%
custom 5384518787242402336
28
1.41%
custom 5246809791996665727
23
1.16%
custom 5271762396640200492
18
0.909%
custom 5381845767101098806
18
0.909%
custom 5841635231752264778
10
0.505%
👀
9
0.455%
🥰
3
0.152%
Custom emoji. 11 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,980reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Эксперимент за 570 рублей. Как я купила билет на фильм, который "ненавижу" и почему вы сделали бы так же.
В пятницу вечером я добровольно отдала 570 рублей за сеанс фильма «Последний богатырь. Колобок» и потратила свое драгоценное время. И нет, у меня не помутился рассудок. Я пошла туда по той же причине, по которой Гарик Харламов сегодня пишет посты про чаек. Мы оба ставим социальный эксперимент.
Давайте честно, м…
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ -это не про продуктивность.
Как психолог, я часто слышу:
Инна, лето в разгаре, а я ничего не успеваю! Ни книгу дочитать, ни язык подтянуть, даже на море съездить некогда.
Мы приносим свои рабочие проблемы и перфекционизм прямо на пляжный шезлонг. Пытаемся сделать из отпуска проект с KPI. Но мозг так не умеет.
С точки зрения нейробиологии "dolce far niente" (сладкое безделье) -это не лень, а жизненно необх…
🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺🔺
Инны Гулиной и Алёны Бурс
"Голая правда. Профи" на площадке VK видео, за 24 часа набрал 4,4к просмотров 🥰
Приглашённый гость Игорь Скурихин, актёр театра и кино, многим знакомый по сериалам: Первый отдел, Невский, След, Глухарь, Карпов, СашаТаня, Девушки с Макаровым и многие другие.
❤️ Видео подкаст: https://vkvideo.ru/video-236386754_456239065?list=7118d2c73fe52d38c3&t=32s
Личная страница гостя:
📶 https:…
✅ Слезы Роналду
Сейчас самый пик футбола, в каждой семье наконец-то включают тот самый запылившийся телевизор.Уже были пролеты слезы и произошел момент когда трансляция игры закончилась, экран погас, а у многих из вас внутри до сих пор бушует шторм.
Когда мы видим слезы Криштиану Роналду (или другого титана спорта) в прямом эфире, первая реакция -шок. Нам кажется, что такие люди сделаны из стали. Но психология гово…
Попробуйте угадать професию нового героя подкаста "Голая правда. Профи"
Актер сериала СашаТаня24%
Автор-исполнитель24%
Главный злодей многих сериалов22%
Ведущий радиостанции12%
Актер дубляжа29%
Другое (напиши в комментариях)0%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🆕 Моя новая картина "Итальянская Ривьера у дома" доступна для приобретения. По всем вопросам обращайтесь в личку 👇
📱 Телеграм @InnaGulina
📲 Мах
📱 Vk
Картины в продаже: https://taplink.cc/gulinart
#Gulinart@GulinaPsy
Когда саморазвитие становится бесконечным проектом или ловушка "улучшенной версии себя"
Вы когда-нибудь чувствовали, что бежите марафон, у которого нет финиша? Вы читаете книги по психологии, проходите курсы, медитируете, ведёте дневники и честно выполняете все рекомендации из соцсетей. Но вместо прилива сил ощущаете лишь усталость и глухое раздражение. Знакомо?
В нашей культуре культ продуктивности и самосовершенс…
💅 Сегодня после очередной консультации у меня возник вопрос для всех достигаторов.
Саморазвитие безусловно прекрасно, а сталкивались Вы с моментом когда обучение превращается в бесконечный проект без результата. Когда стремление стать лучше заставляет вас чувствовать себя хуже ❓
Поделитесь в комментариях, сталкивались ли Вы с подобным? Давайте сегодня обсудим наболевшее 💬
#саморазвитие #психология #осознанность #в…
☕️ Мужчины в России страдают от «бензиновой тревожности»
В последнее время всё чаще фиксируется у мужчин в России новое состояние, которое уже получило неофициальное название «бензиновая тревожность».
«Бензиновая тревожность» -это страх потерять мобильность и привычный образ жизни из-за возможной нехватки топлива.
На данный момент участились случаи, когда мужчины обращались к специалистам с жалобами на общую трево…
Ожидание / реальность
Лето не по сценарию или арт-практики которые помогают справиться с разочарованием
Прилетаю я из жарких стран, а здесь дождь, слякоть и прохлада. А между прочем планы уже расписаны были на все лето и хотелось конечно продлить себе отпуск, провести отдых у бассейна. И тут сталкиваешься вместо чувства приятного ожидания с ощущением жуткого опустошения. Знакомо? Ну тогда давайте вместе от него из…
👍54custom 526057160165242856646🍓32😍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @GulinaPsy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Попробуйте угадать професию нового героя подкаста "Голая правда. Профи"
Актер сериала СашаТаня24%
Автор-исполнитель24%
Главный злодей многих сериалов22%
Ведущий радиостанции12%
Актер дубляжа29%
Другое (напиши в комментариях)0%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 8 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 778,196 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Психологиня 🌹 ✨ Про науку о внутреннем мире.” (@GulinaPsy), 2,940 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GulinaPsy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
