Channel
@GucciApes1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001918318900 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GucciApes1 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 4 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GucciApes1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 3 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 3 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 4 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 42.9% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 14.3% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2023 to 14 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 17 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
https://t.me/WarioXrpDumbledoreYugioh69Inu Looking very bullish with having the X like the new twitter and wario Elons alias , can see this being a big sendor in the bullrun may want to look for a position,
Signed Smokey
https://t.me/SEGAerc Ready for next leg
Signed Gucci G 💎
https://t.me/Ladys2ETH Your invited to the best 2.0 coin I could find after pepe 2.0 at 26m
Signed Gucci G 💎
https://t.me/elontokentg 0x4663f196b9d600e52bd631f69a10f16a885d3196 Shares in all Elons companies At 40k No brainer
Signed Gucci G 💎
0x4663f196b9d600e52bd631f69a10f16a885d3196 Shares in all Elons companies At 40k No brainer
Signed Gucci G 💎
https://t.me/MiyagiEntry Pro the doge backing and top call channels so far Clean launch Nice tokenomics ‘Tax on tax off’ Ready for the next let LFG
Signed Gucci G 💎
https://t.me/Discord_Coin Eric cryptoman just joined and seems he is fully behind this token Let’s go
Signed Gucci G 💎
https://t.me/TheBrainAi Finding an entry
Signed Gucci G 💎
https://t.me/XiasiETH Kishu dev ? Highly likely 30k mcap Deez nuts
Signed Gucci G 💎
https://t.me/noahcoineth This one’s a mooner I’m seeing all the right people in here 👀 Very early compared to $jesus that hit 100m $70k 100x or even 1000x possible here ! Let’s go!
❤1
Signed Gucci G 💎
Hey everyone these are the tokens I am in $Bart - strong team like homer that’s at 14m at 300k and Homer dev low-key shilled it’s Super meme bros $169k strong team and someone there (apparently) friends with shytoshi Pepecoin - your 2nd chance pepe 200k (apparently old pepe at 700m own some of it) That’s enough for now
Signed Gucci G 💎
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GucciApes1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@GucciApes1 named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gucci Apes Calls” (@GucciApes1), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GucciApes1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.