📌Copytrading on GramFi Find top Polymarket traders. ✅See their score, P&L and why they’re worth copying. ✅Set your limits and let GramFi copy their trades automatically. Try it today 🚀 https://t.me/Gramfi_Polymarket_bot

Channel
GramFi Official Channel
@GramFi_Official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Declared links · Cite this entry
37,873subscribers
-529 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003330710899 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GramFi_Official |
| Description | GramFi is a Telegram-native InfoFi platform that transforms fragmented Telegram discussions into actionable market intelligence. https://gramfi.ai https://x.com/gramfi_ai https://docs.gramfi.ai/ |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 20 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GramFi_Official |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 37,873 | -146 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:37 | 38,019 | -88 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 38,107 | -16 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:33 | 38,123 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 38,125 | -202 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 38,327 | -51 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:02 | 38,378 | -24 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 38,402 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 38,402 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.4%
- avg views ÷ 37,873 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 152
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 2.13%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (20 February 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 910 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 01:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 27
- Videos
- 3
- Links
- 21
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1m 14s
- Average length
- 25s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
353 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 102 | 28.9% | |
| 👍 | 99 | 28.0% | |
| 🥰 | 59 | 16.7% | |
| 🔥 | 55 | 15.6% | |
| 👌 | 12 | 3.40% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 3.12% | |
| 🤩 | 8 | 2.27% | |
| 😁 | 7 | 1.98% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 353reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 20 February 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
GramFi scans thousands of Telegram channels at once, so you can see which coins are being mentioned right now, all in one view. 📡 Which tickers are gaining traction and which are fading? 📈📉 A drone's eye view of the conversation. Check it out: https://gramfi.ai 🔗
💸 Withdrawals are open!!! Beta lock is off. Your balance is yours — withdraw whenever you want. Wallet → Withdraw (USDC.e on Polygon, 2FA required) 🙏 Your reports became real fixes — thank you to everyone who joined the beta and took the time to break things properly. 📣 When it lands, post on X that it worked. A screenshot from you says more than anything we can claim ourselves. https://gramfi.ai
❤2
🚀 PolyBot update — new stuff is live 📸 PnL cards Hit PnL in Trade History or My Portfolio and the bot sends you a card with your result — entry, exit, profit. One button shares it straight to X. 💰 Auto-redeem winnings Won a market? Your pUSD now lands in your wallet on its own — no hunting for the Redeem button. On by default; you can switch it off in Settings. ⚡ One-click bet Set your stake once and every bet ski…
🚀 We've shipped a big update and reopened testing on Polymarket TG bot 👇 💸 Test USDC has been sent to your wallets — go put it to work. 🎁 Feedback rewards paid: everyone who submitted feedback got an extra 10 USDC. Thank you 🙏 🏦 Withdrawals unlock once the beta wraps up — your funds are safe until then. Take it for a spin and tell us what breaks 🐞 — your feedback shapes what ships next. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎟 Not in …
❤4👍1🔥1
🚀 GramFI Polymarket Beta is open! We've reopened beta access with a brand-new application form. Want in? Apply here 👇 🔗 Link 💰 What approved testers get: • 10 USDC credited to your bot wallet to test with • +10 USDC after you finish testing & send your feedback Who we're looking for: real users who'll actually use the bot — trade on Polymarket right inside Telegram, click through the features, and tell us honestly…
❤4
Bet on Polymarket straight from Telegram! Hundreds of testers worldwide are already trading Polymarket through our Telegram bot. It is not too late! Grab 10 USD, bet on Polymarket for free, and unlock even more rewards when the test ends. 👇 Apply here: Link 👇GramFi - Polymarket TG bot here: Link #Gramfi
❤4
Beta Testers Wanted ! Join and get 10 USD just for participating! Be among the first to try our Telegram bot for Polymarket trading. Use your 10 USD to bet on the World Cup ✅Only 15 slots, first come first served ✅Instant 10 USD free trading credit ✅Extra reward at the end of the beta Fill out the form and grab your slot ! 👉Application form link
🚀 GramFI Polymarket Bot Polymarket inside Telegram ! Trade sports, crypto, politics & world events directly from Telegram. No wallet setup. No seed phrase. No gas. Just open Telegram and start! 🌍 Available in: 🇬🇧 🇷🇺 🇨🇳 🇰🇷 🎁 Closed Beta (15–25 testers) - ✅ Receive free pUSD to place your first bets (no personal deposit required) - ✅ 0% trading fees during the entire beta - ✅ Copy top traders in one tap - ✅ Ea…
🚀New Feature Update and New Service Launch!🔥 Now you can easily place Polymarket bets right from Telegram! Polymarket is now available on Telegram, too. For details, check out https://gramfi.ai/polymarket or head straight to the Telegram bot link at https://t.me/Gramfi_Polymarket_bot ! 🚀🚀🚀 #Gramfi #infofi
❤2
🚀New update! You can now trade Polymarket bets directly on GramFi. Place bets right on the website, or search Polymarket events and bet with ease straight from Telegram. More features are shipping continuously. 👉Check it out → gramfi.ai/polymarket
👍3
🚀 New GramFi Update! Channel Interactions See how Telegram channels forward, connect, and interact across borders. Now visualized by country. Wherever you're from, explore how crypto channels in your country are moving, talking, and shaping the conversation. Now live on gramfi.ai 🌍 #gramfi #infofi
👏11
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GramFi_Official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 462,380 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@GramFi_Official named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 10 posts, 9 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Declared links
3 URLs this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“GramFi Official Channel” (@GramFi_Official), 37,873 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GramFi_Official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.