Hacking & security — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 6 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
4 measurements spanning 17 days, net +50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 126–191 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Oct 2026, 05:17
183
+17
25 Sept 2026, 20:41
166
+33
19 Sept 2026, 17:22
133
no change
19 Sept 2026, 16:47
133
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
79.5%
avg views ÷ 183 subscribers
Avg views / post
146
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.81%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 September 2026
Posts held
10 (26 June 2026 – 16 September 2026)
Views total
291
Reactions total
14
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
19 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
94 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
43
45.7%
🔥
39
41.5%
🤝
12
12.8%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 94 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 16 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚠️دومینوی دروغ پایان ندارد.
در ادامه عدم پاسخگویی در خصوص آسیب پذیری، مسدود شدن و فلگ خوردن سرورهای سامانه جعلی علاج برای دومین بار در سال جاری، بجای پاسخگویی به مخاطبین، و یا پیگیری توسط نهادهای متولی امنیت سایبری، مشغول روایت فتح سازی از این فاجعه ملی هستند.
https://web.archive.org/web/20260916082930/https://alajgroup.ir/
امنیت ملی، مضحکه جاهلان، ملعبه خائنان...
✅ @GoorkanLink
#خبرنامه | علاج!
⚠️ سقوط یک بلوف امنیتی؛ وقتی توهم جای تخصص را میگیرد
پیرو هشدارهای پیشین، حباب ادعاهای توخالی در کمتر از ۲۴ ساعت ترکید. پلتفرمی که با پولپاشیهای نجومی، رپرتاژهای کور در صداوسیما و بمباران تبلیغاتی در پیامرسانهای داخلی و شبکههای خاکستری تلگرام با شعار «امنیت نفوذناپذیر» و «رمزنگاریهای فوقپیچیده» رونمایی شده بود، نیامده متلاشی شد.
⚠️ فاجعه اصلی کجاست؟
بحران واقعی فروریختن یک برند پوشالی نیست…
#آموزش | سایبریهای پلاستیکی
⚠️چرا نباید به برندهای نوظهورِ بظاهر وطنپرست اعتماد کرد؟
❗️خلیج خوکها، اخوانالمخبرین، علاج، کمیته مجازات، حافظهما، وطنفروش یاب، آتش به اختیارها ...
برندهای ساختگی با کارنامه از مملو از ضربه به خودی و بازی به نفع دشمنان ایران
✅ @GoorkanLink
🌟 #اطلاعیه
🎛صفحه اینستاگرام گورکن به نشانیهای زیر در دسترس است.
🌐صفحه فعال | @Goorkaninsta
🌐صفحه اصلی | @Goorkanlink
🔓 برای اطلاع راحتتر از فراخوانها و فیلمهای آموزشی، ما را دنبال کنید.
✅️ @GoorkanLink
🌟 اعضای گروه تروریستیِ قاتل شهید رجبزاده حین فرار از کشور دستگیر شدند.
▫️معرفی و شناسائی از شما،
مجازات وطنفروش با گورکن!
🔗 @GoorkanAdmin
🔗 @CallGKbot
🔗 Goorkan.com
✅️ @GoorkanLink
🌟 #اطلاعیه
🎛وبسایت گورکن به نشانی Goorkan.com در دسترس است.
🔓 برای مشاهده و تکمیل اطلاعات عناصر خودفروخته پهلوی، با ما در ارتباط باشید.
🔗 Goorkan.com | وبسایت
🔗 @GoorkanAdmin | پشتیبانی
🔗 @CallGKbot | معرفی
✅️ @GoorkanLink
🌟 فوری و مهم! لطفا در تمام گروهها منتشر کنید
در حالی که مدافعان ما در جبهه جنوب ایران سینه سپر کردهاند، «ستون پنجم» در خیابانهای خودمان فعال شده!
شبکهی تروریستی سلطنتطلب، با دلارهای کثیف اسرائیلی و تحت پوشش «اعتراضات اقتصادی»، دستور گرفتهاند تا خیابانها را به آشوب بکشند.
هدف چیست؟ ایجاد آشوب داخلی و براندازی مسلحانه نظیر کودتای دیماه ۱۴۰۴.
- ستاد عملیاتی گورکن با هدف مقابله هدفمند با لیدرهای جنگطلب و پیاده…
🌟 #فراخوان
معرفی وطنفروشان و خائنین
➕دفاع از جان کودکان و زنان، نیازی به مقدمه ندارد. در هر کجای جهان که ایستادهاید، با هر عقیده و منشی، اگر خط قرمز شما «ایران» است، اکنون زمان اقدام است.
با معرفی شبکهی وطنفروشان حامی پهلوی و اکانتهای سایبری متصل به ماشین ترور اسرائیل، شریان تغذیهی آنها را قطع کنید و پیش از آنکه فجایعی تلختر از میناب و لامرد رقم بخورد، گودال آنها را حفر کنید.
📎 هرگونه اطلاعات نظیر شماره ت…
گورکن | Goorkan pinned «🔨 #داستان گورکن سالهاست شبکههای آشوبگر و وطنفروش، به یک تجارت کثیف و توهمی تاریک عادت کردهاند: فاند بگیر، آشوب ایجاد کن، و سپس با پاک کردن اکانت و شکستن سیمکارت، با خیال آسوده به زندگی عادی برگرد. ❗️ اما گورکن برای پایان دادن به همین حاشیهی امن…»
🔨 #داستان گورکن
سالهاست شبکههای آشوبگر و وطنفروش، به یک تجارت کثیف و توهمی تاریک عادت کردهاند:
فاند بگیر،
آشوب ایجاد کن،
و سپس با پاک کردن اکانت و شکستن سیمکارت، با خیال آسوده به زندگی عادی برگرد.
❗️ اما گورکن برای پایان دادن به همین حاشیهی امن بیدار شده است.
هدف گورکن، لیدرها و ضحاکصفتانی است که نابودی و غارت ایران برایشان یک «پروژهی مالی پرسود» است؛ کسانی که ادامهی حیاتشان و سرازیر شدن دلارهای سیاه به حس…
❤6🔥3🤝1
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @Goorkan1405. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“گورکن | Goorkan” (@Goorkan1405), 183 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Goorkan1405.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.