3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 707–708 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 04:44
707
-1
8 Aug 2026, 02:17
708
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:07
708
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
33.5%
avg views ÷ 707 subscribers
Avg views / post
237
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.00%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
20 (30 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,657
Reactions total
26
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 42s
Average length
1m 21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
52 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
17
32.7%
👍
13
25.0%
❤
12
23.1%
🕊
4
7.69%
custom 5197371802136892976
3
5.77%
🎉
1
1.92%
💯
1
1.92%
🤣
1
1.92%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🗣 AMA с Давидом и Даниилом Либерман
Сегодня, 7 августа в 18:30 МСК, пройдет AMA сессия с основателями Gonka.
Что обсудим:
▪️Рынок компьюта: становится ли он доступнее и как выход Kimi K3 повлиял на централизованных игроков
▪️Год протоколу: что сделано и что ещё предстоит
▪️Итоги июля и WebX Asia
▪️Токен $GNK: почему рост сети важен для всех, от майнеров до разработчиков
▪️Модели: какие появятся в сети и по какому …
🌐 Gonka на WebX Asia 2026: итоги конференции
Братья Либерман опубликовали подробный материал о том, как прошло участие Gonka в одной из крупнейших технологических конференций Азии. Делимся главным.
Gonka впервые появилась на крупной международной конференции в статусе Platinum Sponsor и это произошло благодаря голосованию сообщества. Именно участники сети предложили, проголосовали и профинансировали присутствие про…
Маркетинг-план OWAI Studio: как устроена система заработка? 💸
Через 5 минут начинаем прямой эфир с Анатолием Илли. Разбираем амбассадорскую программу нашего проекта.
Без воды, только конкретика: как устроена математика выплат, за что именно платит компания и как выстроить здесь стабильный доход.
Это база для тех, кто хочет не просто пользоваться продуктом, а строить бизнес вместе с нами.
Подключайтесь сейчас: htt…
Пришло время для реального ИТ-продукта. 🚀
Друзья, сегодня мы открываем предстарт OWAI Studio. Это не очередной «проект с миллионным заработком» из ниоткуда. Это технологическое решение для самой острой проблемы в индустрии — как новичку стать контент-мейкером и не бросить блог через три месяца.
На презентации мы впервые «вскроем» платформу и покажем, как система превращает ваш опыт и историю в охватный контент ваши…
🚀 Сегодня в 19:00 (МСК) — ключевое событие нашего проекта OWAI STUDIO
Мы переходим в фазу предстарта. Сегодня официально открываем карты: показываем обновленный продукт, партнерские кабинеты и дорожную карту нашего предзапуска на ближайший месяц.
👆 Выше прикрепил аудиосообщение. Это обязательный материал для каждого, кто планирует строить бизнес с нами. В аудио я разобрал суть того, почему сегодняшний вечер — это ф…
📊 Gonka AI теперь на Dune: Эпоха прозрачности началась
Проект Gonka AI стал еще более открытым и профессиональным. Теперь вся базовая ончейн-аналитика доступна на Dune Analytics — главном мировом стандарте для отслеживания блокчейн-данных в реальном времени.
Что это значит для сообщества и инвесторов?
Dune — это «лакмусовая бумажка» для любого серьезного блокчейн-проекта. Если проект есть на Dune, это значит, что …
🔥 Забирай 20$ на активацию тарифа OWAI!
Провожу розыгрыш 100$ среди участников нашей команды. Разыгрываем 5 призов по 20$ — это готовая сумма на старт в нашей студии!
Что нужно сделать:
🟢Перейти в пост: https://t.me/RADAR_AI_Studio/111
🟢Поставить лайк и оставить осмысленный комментарий под видео которое указано в посте.
🟢Дождаться итогов в эту среду, 8 июля.
Ваша активность — наше общее топливо. Участвуй! 🚀
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GonkaProtocol_Channel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 644,240 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gonka AI | OWAI” (@GonkaProtocol_Channel), 707 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GonkaProtocol_Channel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
