Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 42 days, net -22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,972–2,000 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 14:21
1,975
-2
14 Sept 2026, 09:41
1,977
-1
10 Sept 2026, 16:38
1,978
-1
6 Sept 2026, 00:38
1,979
-3
1 Sept 2026, 22:36
1,982
-3
30 Aug 2026, 00:44
1,985
+1
24 Aug 2026, 08:47
1,984
-3
20 Aug 2026, 16:12
1,987
+1
17 Aug 2026, 13:38
1,986
-6
14 Aug 2026, 01:46
1,992
-4
10 Aug 2026, 15:34
1,996
-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:47
1,997
no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:39
1,997
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 27 November 2023 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 12s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
16,415 reactions across 8 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,631
16.0%
👍
2,416
14.7%
👏
2,349
14.3%
🔥
2,122
12.9%
🥰
2,085
12.7%
🎉
2,051
12.5%
🤩
2,038
12.4%
💩
322
1.96%
🖕
113
0.688%
👎
97
0.591%
🤣
81
0.493%
🫡
42
0.256%
😁
38
0.231%
🤬
9
0.055%
🤔
5
0.03%
🤨
5
0.03%
🤝
3
0.018%
🤪
3
0.018%
🦄
2
0.012%
💅
1
0.006%
2 further kinds
2
0.012%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,415 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2023 to 23 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ما از شما بابت پیشنهادهای زیادی که در پی درخواست ما برای دسترسی به سازمان های رژیم ارسال کردید قدردانی میکنیم. اما تاکید میکنیم که ما فقط میتوانیم از دسترسی هایی که با درخواست ما مطابقت دارند استفاده کنیم.
به ارسال پیشنهادهای خود ادامه دهید.
رژیم ایران جهان را به جنگ جهانی سوم می کشاند!
ما از تمام کسانی که تحت حکومت تروریستی رنج می برند دعوت میکنیم با ما همکاری کنند.
اگر به ارگان های جنایت کار رژیم دسترسی دارید می توانید به ما کمک کنید تا شیطان را فلج کنیم.
برای پیشنهاد همکاری، پیام هایتان را به تلگرام ما ارسال کنید: http://t.me/gonjeshkedrandeofficial
طبق منابع ما برخی از مسولین پمپ بنزینها به اجبار رژیم اطلاعرسانی غلط انجام میدهند اما به ما گفته شده که وضعیت بسیار وخیم میباشد.
باید تذکر بدهیم که وضعیت سوخت رسانی وخیم به دلیل هک پیاپی ما هست 🤣🤣🤣
با ارسال عکس و فیلم وضعیت وخیم سوخت رسانی را گزارش بدهید
According to our sources and gas stations we know that employees were ordered to lie about the severity of the situation. Which is severe because we are constantly attacking the network 😉
We invite everyone to comment with content showing the current situation for the world to
Khamenei, expect us.
خامنه ای از دور عروسک های تروریستش را فعال میکنه و این حمله تذکری "بسیار" کوچک به شرارت های او بود
خامنه ای! هشدار ما را جدی بگیر
استمرار این اختلال بی دلیل نیست ....
Khamenei! Playing with proxies a girl can get burned...
As in our previous operations, this cyberattack was conducted in a controlled manner while taking measures to limit potential damage to emergency services.
We delivered warnings to emergency services across the country before the operation began, and ensured a portion of the gas stations across the country were left unharmed for the same reason, despite our access and capability to completely disrupt their operatio…
گوشه کوچکی از اثبات فعالیت ما در شبکه:
- شناسه ایستگاه های سوخت
- اطلاعات سیستمهای پرداخت
- شبکه اصلی روابط مدیریت ایستگاه سوخت
- چند عکس از لحظاتی که داخل شبکه بودیم.
A little taste of what can be found on their network:
- Individual gas station information
- Payment system details
- Gas station management system accessed from each station’s central server
- More images captured while in their network
ما گروه "گنجشک درنده" بار دیگر سیستم سوخت رسانی ملی رژیم جمهوری اسلامی را هدف حمله سایبری قرار دادیم.
خامنه ای! همانطور که قبلا تذکر دادیم در مقابل تحریکات شرورانه تو در منطقه عکس العمل نشان خواهیم داد.
این حمله قسمت بسیار کوچکی از توانایی های ما در مقابل شرارت محورهای تروریست تو در منطقه است.
#گنجشک_ درنده
تلگرام: t.me/GonjeshkeDarandeOfficial
توییتر: @GonjeshkeDarand @DarandeGonjeshk
ردیت: @GonjeshkeDarande
We…
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @GonjeshkeDarandeOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@GonjeshkeDarandeOfficial named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@gonjeshkedrandeofficial named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gonjeshke Darande” (@GonjeshkeDarandeOfficial), 1,975 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GonjeshkeDarandeOfficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.