Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Голос нейросети | ИИ

Channel

Голос нейросети | ИИ

@GolosaNejroseti

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

6,965subscribers

-14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001804704746
TypeChannel
Username@GolosaNejroseti
Description🚨 Обязательно прочитать этот пост первым - https://t.me/GolosaNejroseti/20 💬 Чат https://t.me/+mBMfWr2o4kgyNWYy Модели взяты из открытых источников* Администрирует @Kabanc4i_k
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/GolosaNejroseti

Growth

6,9656,9846,974.57 August 2026 — 6,979 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,979 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,984 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,973 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,972 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,965 subscribers7 August 202618 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,962–6,987 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Aug 2026, 00:116,965-7
15 Aug 2026, 07:256,972-1
11 Aug 2026, 15:276,973-11
8 Aug 2026, 08:576,984+5
7 Aug 2026, 12:326,979no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:266,979first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 25 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.0%
avg views ÷ 6,965 subscribers
Avg views / post
904
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.622%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held19 (25 April 202619 August 2026)
Views total5,425
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
125
Videos
454
Links
468

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11m 29s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5137.5%
🔥4734.6%
🤣1511.0%
🤡139.56%
😁75.15%
😢32.21%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
37
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
37
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @GolosaNejroseti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 April 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC244 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Voice Studio — локальное приложение для работы с голосом. Оно не требует подписки, регистрации и API-ключей: все операции выполняются на вашем компьютере. С его помощью можно: • клонировать голос по короткой аудиозаписи; • создавать синтетические голоса с заданным тембром, возрастом и акцентом; • переводить и дублировать видео; • озвучивать книги и истории, назначая разные голоса персонажам; • преобразовывать речь в

👍2

18 Aug 2026, 08:03 UTC444 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

AlayaWorld — видеогенератор интерактивных миров в реальном времени Модель делает ставку на долгосрочную согласованность мира и мгновенную реакцию на действия пользователя. Демоверсия доступна внизу сайта. Что уже умеет: • генерировать более 60 секунд непрерывного видео в формате 720p при 24 FPS; • управлять персонажем с помощью клавиш WASD; • использовать заклинания как часть игрового процесса; • менять визуальный

15 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC907 views12 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

ИИ-видео с Уиллом Смитом, который ест спагетти, вышло на совершенно новый уровень. @GolosaNejroseti

🤣12

12 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC≈1,210 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Anthropic о маркировке контента, созданного ИИ. Anthropic рассказала, как выполняет требования статьи 50(2) европейского Закона об искусственном интеллекте. Компания использует специальные технологии для идентификации AI-контента: • невидимые водяные знаки для текста; • стандарт C2PA для изображений; • дополнительные метаданные о происхождении контента. При этом Anthropic подчёркивает: ни один метод не гарантирует

👍2

10 Aug 2026, 18:05 UTC≈1,370 views11 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

LiDAR + лазерная система для уничтожения комаров и мошек уже продаётся в Китае за $1000. Кажется, мы стремительно приближаемся к эпохе научной фантастики и делаем это с лазером в руках 🔦 @GolosaNejrosetieti

👍4🔥4🤣3

9 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC≈1,250 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Переписываем ход истории: в сети набирает популярность браузерный ИИ-симулятор альтернативной истории Pax Historia. Принцип работы простой: • каждой страной на карте управляет нейросеть; • игрок выбирает историческую эпоху и государство, от лица которого будет играть; • любое событие прошлого можно изменить, а ИИ мгновенно просчитывает последствия и перестраивает геополитическую картину мира. Пользователи уже присое

👍2🔥2

21 Jul 2026, 04:23 UTC≈2,900 views8 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

🌟 Fable 5 и Kimi K3 🌟 на задаче создания клона Limbo, результаты оказались весьма интересными. Fable 5 сгенерировал около 2400 строк кода, использовал 24 тысячи выходных токенов, а стоимость генерации составила $1.20. Kimi K3 показал себя гораздо более экономичным: он написал около 3000 строк кода, потратил 30 тысяч токенов и обошёлся всего в $0.12, что в 10 раз дешевле! Что касается качества, Fable немного опережа

🔥6👍2

12 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC≈3,130 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

Роботы становятся всё больше похожи на нас 🦾 Андроид NEO получил серьезный апгрейд рук. Теперь у него в каждой кисти 25 степеней свободы и тактильная «кожа», которая чувствует силу нажатия и даже скольжение предмета. @GolosaNejrosetieti

7 Jul 2026, 20:54 UTC≈3,110 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Как сделать AI-видео неотличимым от реальности? Ответ в Seedance. Посмотрите на два примера — оба созданы нейронкой, хотя выглядят как любительская съемка. Промт для повтора в комментах 👇 @GolosaNejrosetieti

👍5

24 May 2026, 07:44 UTC≈5,990 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Ваш роутер может знать о вас больше, чем кажется. 📡 На GitHub проект RuView, который превращает Wi-Fi в инструмент тотального наблюдения. В чем фишка? Система анализирует искажения Wi-Fi-сигнала в комнате. ИИ превращает эти «помехи» в данные о том, где вы находитесь, как двигаетесь и даже как дышите. Камеры не нужны — роутер «видит» сквозь стены. Жутковатый инструмент, который может следить за вами 24/7, пока вклю

🔥3😢3

16 May 2026, 05:56 UTC≈4,930 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Poll

Представьте задачу ИИ «Излечить все болезни людей». Какой самый вероятный «логичный», но катастрофический способ решения этой задачи может выбрать сверхразум?

  1. ИИ решит, что смерть это болезнь организма, и устранит всех людей.37%
  2. ИИ создаст виртуальную реальность, где люди будут без биологических тел, чтобы избежать болезней.25%
  3. ИИ будет долго и упорно искать лекарства, постепенно улучшая медицину.38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤡4

12 May 2026, 14:48 UTC≈4,530 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Video

Unitree представила первого меха-робота. Модель GD01, которая в два раза выше обычного человека, оснащена кабиной пилота. Робот может передвигаться как на двух, так и на четырёх ногах. Начальная цена — 💲650,000 @GolosaNejrosetieti

🔥7

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GolosaNejroseti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 May 2026, 05:56 UTCAnonymous Quiz169 voters

Представьте задачу ИИ «Излечить все болезни людей». Какой самый вероятный «логичный», но катастрофический способ решения этой задачи может выбрать сверхразум?

  1. ИИ решит, что смерть это болезнь организма, и устранит всех людей.37%
  2. ИИ создаст виртуальную реальность, где люди будут без биологических тел, чтобы избежать болезней.25%
  3. ИИ будет долго и упорно искать лекарства, постепенно улучшая медицину.38%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2026 to 19 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 530,180 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Голос нейросети | ИИ” (@GolosaNejroseti), 6,965 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GolosaNejroseti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.