Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Голос Асаров

Channel

Голос Асаров

@Golos_Asara

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

20subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003861497616
TypeChannel
Username@Golos_Asara
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 4 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/Golos_Asara

Growth

1721197 August 2026 — 18 subscribers8 August 2026 — 17 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20 subscribers207 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 35 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16–22 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 03:4220-1
28 Aug 2026, 01:0321+1
20 Aug 2026, 11:1720+2
14 Aug 2026, 12:1618+1
11 Aug 2026, 20:3117no change
8 Aug 2026, 01:1017-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:4318first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
0s
Average length
0s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 8 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1588.2%
👍15.88%
🔥15.88%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC77 viewsread 11 August 2026

На заметку против тех кто говорит :"что рука это обезательно орган " и таким образом мол если ты утверждаешь руку Аллаху то ты уподобил его к телам

28 Jul 2026, 20:09 UTC103 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Слово "рука" в русском яз. обезательно орган? И что делать с теми ученными которые говорили что утверждаем "йад"но осталвяем ее смысла? Есть два пути (определение) смысла слов: 1) Денотативная дефиниция- объясняет, что такое вещь по своей сущности. 2)коннотативное определение-объясняет только основное значение слова, не раскрывая его сущность. В русском языке слово «рука» имеет общий смысл (коннотативное определе

2

27 Jul 2026, 07:23 UTC61 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ибн Аби Бишр аль-Аш'ари (ум. 324 г.х) пишет: Пусть спросят приверженцев нововведений: «На каком основании вы утверждаете, что слова Аллаха «в Моей руке» (بيدي) означают «Моя милость»? Выводите ли вы это значение из единогласного мнения (иджма) или из арабского языка?» — и они не найдут ни того, ни другого. الآبانة عن اصول الديانة ٥٢

2

20 Jul 2026, 11:12 UTC62 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @al_mudawwanahPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

1

12 Jul 2026, 19:11 UTC69 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Имам аз-Зухри имам имамов, и другие ученые этой общины сказали: «На Аллахе – разъяснение, на посланнике –донесение, а на нас – принятие и согласие» См. «Фатх аль Бари», 13/512.

4👍1🔥1

11 Jul 2026, 17:38 UTC54 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Абу Исмаил аль-Ансари, автор книги «Порицание каляма», сказал: мне сообщил Абу Якуб аль-Курраб, нам сообщил мой дед, я слышал Абу аль-Фадля, мне рассказал Исхак Хадсани Мухаммад ибн Ибрахим аль-Асбахани, который сказал: «Я слышал Абу Зур'у ар-Рази, когда его спросили о толковании аята: «Милостивый вознесся на Трон», и он разгневался и сказал: «Его толкование — так, как оно и читается. Он на Троне, без вопроса "как"»

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @Golos_Asara. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Голос Асаров” (@Golos_Asara), 20 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Golos_Asara.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.