Any Indian agents here ? Contact @gurug1_bot
❤54🥰34👍27🤔12😍11😘7

Channel
@GoldsbetVIPAgent
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
9,841subscribers
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002014278866 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GoldsbetVIPAgent |
| Description | 🚀 Agent Treasure Boxes 🎯 Daily Agent Activities 💸 Unlimited Agent Commission 👥 Earn More When Your Team Wins! 🔥 Become an Elite Agent and Boost Your Earnings! 🔗 Official Website: Goldsbet.bet 👉 Chat With Us! https://t.me/+CwLw31lcZFU2MWE1 |
| First recorded | 24 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 1 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GoldsbetVIPAgent |
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Sept 2026, 20:22 | 9,841 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 19 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
659 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 191 | 29.0% | |
| 👍 | 134 | 20.3% | |
| 🥰 | 123 | 18.7% | |
| 😍 | 102 | 15.5% | |
| 😘 | 89 | 13.5% | |
| 🤔 | 14 | 2.12% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 0.455% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.303% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.152% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 659 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2025 to 10 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Any Indian agents here ? Contact @gurug1_bot
❤54🥰34👍27🤔12😍11😘7
🔛Abi Join kro Free Premium Bot & Prediction Channel Download Now Goldsbet.bet Play Aviator Game & Mines 24X7 Predictions 😍🥺🫠🫡🫡 🩵@GoldsBet_Mines 🩵@goldsbet_aviator 🩵@WGMines_HacKBoT 🩵@GoldsBet_AviatorBoT
❤44👍8🥰5😍5😘4🔥3😱2😁1
Can you turn 1000 into 3000 by playing Chicken road in Goldsbet?
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
👍18🥰7😘7❤5😍5
🤩 ₹2 to ₹9,999 Daily Bonus! 🤩 👍 Big Random Bonus for Everyone! 🫰Get ₹2000 Refund on 1st Bet Loss In Sports🍀 💰How to Get Your Daily Bonus: 1️⃣Join the Fantasy Social Group. 2️⃣Get your Daily Bonus Code in the group. 3️⃣Redeem your bonus ranging from ₹2 to ₹9,999 4️⃣ Big random bonus for everyone — no one misses out! ⚠️ Important Notes: One code per person per day. Bonus will be credited directly to your account. B…
❤14😘9🥰5😍4👍2
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ New Zealand's challenge to take the lead in the series New Zealand has won the last five out of eight games against the West Indies New Zealand plays at home, and the players know the conditions well West Indies' bowling attack is struggling in these conditions and looks weak ⭐️New Zealand to win Tournament: West Indies tour of New Zealand, 2025 Format: t20 Venue: Saxton Oval Nelson Cricket Gr…
😍10❤6👍4😘4🥰3
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Pakistan, South Africa lock horns in ODI series decider at Faisalabad In the second match, South Africa managed to register a comprehensive win over Pakistan. Lhuan dre-Pretorius, Quinton de Kock and Nandre Burger put in excellent performances for Proteas in the previous match Salman Agha, Saim Ayub and Mohammad Rizwan put in credible performances for Pakistan in the second game of the one-day serie…
👍9😍6❤3🥰2😘2
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ Can Australia level the series at Brisbane? The last five domestic T20 games at the Gabba have been won by the chasing side, indicating a clear advantage to team batting second here. A score of around 180-190 will be competitive at the Gabba. India’s key players for this clash are Abhishek Sharma, Tilak Varma, and Varun Chakaravarthy. ⏬⏬⏬ India are our picks as the winners of the fifth T20I! Tourn…
❤8👍5🥰5😍5😘3
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ 😞 Australia will be without the services of Travis Head in this match, as he has left for Ashes preparation. ➡️A score of around 180-190 will be competitive at Carrara. India will depend on Abhishek Sharma, Tilak Varma, and Varun Chakaravarthy to get them over the line. For Australia, Mitchell Marsh, Tim David, and Nathan Ellis could prove to be game-changers. 🔥🔥🔥 We are backing India as the winner…
❤10🥰5👍3😍2😘2🤔1
NEW GIVEAWAYS FOR AGENTS CONTACT @GuruG1_bot
😍7🥰6😘5❤3👍3
NEW GIVEAWAYS FOR AGENTS CONTACT @GuruG1_bot
👍8❤6😘4🥰3😍1
🔥🔥🔥 ❗️❗️❗️ ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ India’s key players for this clash are Smriti Mandhana, Jemimah Rodrigues, and Deepti Sharma. A score of around 300+ will be needed to stay competitive at Dr DY Patil Sports Academy. South Africa Women will rely on key contributions from Laura Wolvaardt, Marizanne Kapp, and Tazmin Brits. In their previous clash in this World Cup, South Africa Women defeated India Women by three wickets. In…
😍6❤4👍4🥰4😘4
🔥🔥🔥 ❗️❗️❗️ ❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ India’s key players for this clash are Smriti Mandhana, Jemimah Rodrigues, and Deepti Sharma. A score of around 300+ will be needed to stay competitive at Dr DY Patil Sports Academy. South Africa Women will rely on key contributions from Laura Wolvaardt, Marizanne Kapp, and Tazmin Brits. In their previous clash in this World Cup, South Africa Women defeated India Women by three wickets. In…
😍6😘6❤4🥰3👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @GoldsbetVIPAgent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Can you turn 1000 into 3000 by playing Chicken road in Goldsbet?
The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 October 2025 to 10 December 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Goldsbet Global Agents” (@GoldsbetVIPAgent), 9,841 subscribers as measured 24 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoldsbetVIPAgent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.