🚀 Gold Rider EA — July Performance Update July closed with a -3.64% drawdown. The primary reason was the ranging gold market, with Gold spending most of the month bouncing between $4,000 and $4,200 instead of establishing a sustained trend. These sideways, choppy market conditions are among the most challenging environments for any trend-following trading system and resulted in several false breakouts. 📈 As always…

Channel
Gold Rider EA Official
@GoldRiderEAOfficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,818subscribers
-917 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003049127500 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GoldRiderEAOfficial |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 1 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 1 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GoldRiderEAOfficial |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:39 | 2,818 | -94 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 2,912 | -230 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 3,142 | -355 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:54 | 3,497 | -23 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 3,520 | -50 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:23 | 3,570 | -55 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 3,625 | -52 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 3,677 | -57 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 3,734 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 3,735 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 48.3%
- avg views ÷ 2,818 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,360
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (6 November 2025 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,360 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
Gold Rider EA Official pinned «🚀 Gold Rider EA – Version 4.0 Update 📅 Scheduled Release Date: 25th July 2026 This update focuses on smarter trade exits, stronger daily risk protection, and cleaner entry filtering to keep the EA on the right side of the market. 🔧 What’s New in v4.0 1.…»
🚀 Gold Rider EA – Version 4.0 Update 📅 Scheduled Release Date: 25th July 2026 This update focuses on smarter trade exits, stronger daily risk protection, and cleaner entry filtering to keep the EA on the right side of the market. 🔧 What’s New in v4.0 1. Trend-Based Exit Added Trades now close automatically when the Trend flips against the position, locking in profits before a full reversal develops. 2. Daily Retu…
🚀 Gold Rider EA — June Performance Update Gold Rider EA delivered a solid +7.57% return in June, continuing its consistent performance in changing market conditions. Early in the month, profits were lower due to the high volatility in the gold market. As market conditions stabilized, the EA adapted well and delivered strong performance through the remainder of June, closing the month with a healthy gain. 📈 Check o…
🚀 Gold Rider EA — May Performance Update Gold Rider EA delivered a strong ~18% monthly return, well above our guaranteed 10%+ target. Despite May being a predominantly ranging market, the EA performed strongly and maintained consistent profitability. Thanks for your continued trust. Stay consistent, stay patient — Gold Rider delivers. Get instant access 👉 https://tinyurl.com/gold-rider-ea — ChinEtti Forex
📌 Should You Backtest the Gold Rider EA Over a Long Period? We've received several messages from members asking whether it is okay to backtest the EA over a longer period of time. The short answer is — it is not recommended, and here's why. ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔍 The Core Reason: Fixed TP & SL vs. Changing Market Volatility Most Gold EAs, including the Gold Rider, operate with fixed Take Profit and Stop Loss leve…
📈 Gold Rider EA v3.5 MT5 Backtest Update Backtest results show strong performance with solid consistency and controlled drawdown. Period: M15 (2025.01.01 - 2026.04.25) Initial deposit: $1000 Lot size: 0.01 Total net profit: $6032.91 Profit factor: 2.12 Maximal drawdown: 7.74% Relative drawdown: 11.70% Profit trades (% of total): 70.56% Grab your copy today 👉 https://tinyurl.com/gold-rider-ea
🚀 Gold Rider EA – Version 3.5 Update 📅 Scheduled Release Date: 24th April 2026 This update focuses on sharper entries, faster signal response, and improved trade filtering for higher-quality setups. 🔧 What’s New in v3.5 1. Improved Recovery Engine Timing The recovery system has been refined with better entry timing, allowing more precise positioning and improved efficiency in managing drawdown phases. 2. Unified …
🚀 Gold Rider EA – Version 3.4 Update 📅 Scheduled Release Date: 20th March 2026 This update introduces smarter reentry engine, enhanced trailing function, and improved risk control for Momentum trading. 🔧 What’s New in v3.4 1. Brand-New Reentry Signal Engine A completely new reentry system has been introduced, designed to intelligently identify opportunities to rejoin trends after pullbacks or missed entries. 2. O…
Gold Rider EA Official pinned a photo
🚀 Gold Rider EA MT5 Version Released! The wait is over — Gold Rider EA is now officially live on MT5 🔥 Built for faster execution, smoother performance, and full compatibility with MetaTrader 5. 🎁 Free upgrade for all existing users.
📌 Gold Rider EA v3.3 Update (Last Minute Addition) A new feature has been added based on requests from prop and funded traders. Friday Trade Closure Option ➜ Automatically closes all open trades before Friday market close ➜ Helps avoid weekend risk and stay compliant with prop firm rules ➜ Can be turned ON/OFF from EA settings 📦 Release: Included in Gold Rider EA v3.3 ➜ EA v3.3 update will be sent today to all use…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @GoldRiderEAOfficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 540,683 of 1,629,571 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Gold Rider EA Official” (@GoldRiderEAOfficial), 2,818 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoldRiderEAOfficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.