Who's King tell Me @GreenPipsZone

Channel
๐ฎ๐น๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ต ๐ท๐ฐ๐ท๐บ ๐
@GoldInsighthub525
On this record: Topic ยท Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry
31,103subscribers
+3,094 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002145295870 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @GoldInsighthub525 |
| Description | ๐ FOREX SIGNALS HUB ๐ฅ XAUUSD | Forex Trading โ Free & VIP Signals ๐ Accurate Market Analysis โ ๏ธ Trade With Proper Risk Management ๐ฐ Consistency Beats Luck ๐ Join & Start Trading Smarter. |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 โ estimated from Telegramโs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/GoldInsighthub525 |
Topic
Marketing & affiliate โ a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channelโs own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a modelโs judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured โ it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 00:59 | 31,103 | +7 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 15:41 | 31,096 | +95 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 31,001 | +140 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 30,861 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:18 | 30,859 | +250 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:36 | 30,609 | +377 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 17:21 | 30,232 | +29 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 30,203 | +192 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:26 | 30,011 | +243 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 14:05 | 29,768 | +353 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:08 | 29,415 | +309 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 16:13 | 29,106 | +12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:54 | 29,094 | +24 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 19:58 | 29,070 | +113 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:13 | 28,957 | +110 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:07 | 28,847 | +187 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 28,660 | +73 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:55 | 28,587 | +56 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:53 | 28,531 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 28,528 | first reading |
Engagement
562 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR ยท 30 days
- 5.78%
- avg views รท 31,103 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,800
- 323 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.564%
- reactions รท views ยท ER floor
- Posts in window
- 324
- of 562 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 133 of 323 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 17 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 562 (7 August 2026 โ 17 September 2026) |
| Views total | 581,103 |
| Reactions total | 970 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface โ not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Sept 2026, 16:14 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โcorrectingโ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ 8.12K, 3.7M โ so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 16
- Links
- 2
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 19 September 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
5,520 reactions across 324 posts, in 63 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ๐ | 2,500 | 45.3% | |
| โค | 1,140 | 20.7% | |
| ๐ฅ | 205 | 3.71% | |
| ๐ | 143 | 2.59% | |
| ๐ฅฐ | 110 | 1.99% | |
| ๐ค | 94 | 1.70% | |
| ๐ | 76 | 1.38% | |
| ๐ฏ | 73 | 1.32% | |
| ๐ | 62 | 1.12% | |
| ๐ | 53 | 0.96% | |
| ๐ | 52 | 0.942% | |
| ๐จโ๐ป | 51 | 0.924% | |
| ๐ค | 51 | 0.924% | |
| ๐คฉ | 48 | 0.87% | |
| ๐ | 47 | 0.851% | |
| ๐ | 44 | 0.797% | |
| ๐คทโโ | 42 | 0.761% | |
| ๐คท | 41 | 0.743% | |
| ๐ | 40 | 0.725% | |
| ๐ | 36 | 0.652% | |
| 43 further kinds | 612 | 11.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 324 of the 562 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 5,520 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 562 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 17 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
TP5 SMASHED โ XAUUSD BUY โ +170 PIPS ๐ฅ COMPLETE TARGET ๐ฅ
TP5 SMASHED โ XAUUSD BUY โ +170 PIPS๐ฅ
TP4 SMASHED โ XAUUSD BUY โ +130 PIPS๐ฅ
4327 DONE ๐ฅ๐ฅ
TP4 SMASHED โ XAUUSD BUY โ +120 PIPS๐ฅ
TP SMASHED โ XAUUSD BUY โ +100 PIPS๐ฅ
TP3 SMASHED โ XAUUSD BUY โ +90 PIPS๐ฅ
TP SMASHED โ XAUUSD BUY โ +70 PIPS๐ฅ
TP2 SMASHED โ XAUUSD BUY โ +60 PIPS๐ฅ
TP SMASHED โ XAUUSD BUY โ +40 PIPS๐ฅ
TP1 SMASHED โ XAUUSD BUY โ +30 PIPS๐ฅ
Showing the 12 most recent of 562 posts we hold for @GoldInsighthub525. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegramโs own answer, not this registerโs. When this register asks Telegramโs API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it โ never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegramโs; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@TechnicalPips6273 ยท 56,380#1
@nassniperhuk50 ยท 29,501#2
@ViewXuk50 ยท 50,741#3
@Majid_GoldTechnical ยท 9,297#4
@StarXhuk700 ยท 51,631 (as read 7 September 2026)#5
@Tradewith_Forexking786 ยท 51,316#6
@Goldvlp0 ยท 26,591#7
@GOLDSNNPER786 ยท 52,772#8
@GOLDANALYSISEXPERTi1 ยท 12,820#9
@XAUUSD_KING_SCALPERS ยท 25,025#10
@Frank_adin222 ยท 5,551#11
@TRADEWITHUK500 ยท 21,344#12
@Forexkinghuk50 ยท 11,839#13
@xauusdtrading00000 ยท 29,942#14
@Abdulsaim_000 ยท 6,655#15
@TRADEWITHFURQAN ยท 5,035#16
@GoldenWolfFreeGOldSignal5 ยท 12,186#17
@Fxscorpionzzz ยท 17,619#18
@Xauiusd_trading_maste ยท 5,688#19
@SnipersHuk50 ยท 2,716#20
@MrGoldForex9 ยท 9,590#21
@GoldMarketAcademyPROS ยท 8,361#22
@GFR_ANALYSIS ยท 21,220#23
@GOLDPOWERFULLSIGNAL ยท 1,331#24
@EddieGoldTrader_EGT ยท 5,810#25
@goldsnipers11 ยท 194,929#26
@bengoldtrader ยท 354,398#27
@wireforex0 ยท 26,135#28
@jamesgoldmasterrTs ยท 2#29
@GoldInfinity193 ยท 12,481#30
@Advance3882 ยท 4#31
@HugoTradingxGOLD ยท 26,260#32
@captainmarket123 ยท 2,068#33
@youthkhan ยท 7,252#34
@XauusdGreen_pips002 ยท 4,262#35
@THEGOLD_SNIPER2 ยท 3,867#36
@Aliwithtrade71 ยท 10,550#37
@EasyForexPips ยท 243,380#38
@tradewithQudoosfx ยท 509#39
@Xau_Empire7 ยท 17,181#40
@wells_crypto ยท 69,660#41
@FX_Signal_001 ยท 26,262#42
@nazirov_fxf ยท 30,874#43
@TickerTrade_official ยท 199#44
@diamond_fx ยท 19,916#45
@AamirFx_Pro ยท 11,824#46
Read from Telegramโs recommendation API, most recently 7 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register โ how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegramโs recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโs query is independent of having been queried itself.
@wireforex0 ยท 26,135
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 57 here โ alongside 56 others โ read 13 September 2026
@TechnicalPips6273 ยท 56,380
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 59 here โ alongside 58 others โ read 24 August 2026
@ViewXuk50 ยท 50,741
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 55 here โ alongside 54 others โ read 26 August 2026
@nassniperhuk50 ยท 29,501
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 45 here โ alongside 44 others โ read 10 September 2026
@Tradewith_Forexking786 ยท 51,316
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 54 here โ alongside 53 others โ read 27 August 2026
@XAUUSD_KING_SCALPERS ยท 25,025
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 57 here โ alongside 56 others โ read 15 September 2026
@Goldvlp0 ยท 26,591
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 53 here โ alongside 52 others โ read 12 September 2026
@GOLDSNNPER786 ยท 52,772
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 47 here โ alongside 46 others โ read 25 August 2026
@xauusdtrading00000 ยท 29,942
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 60 here โ alongside 59 others โ read 8 September 2026
@MrHenrys122 ยท 64,012
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 58 here โ alongside 57 others โ read 22 August 2026
@Volatility_Indices_Index_Signals ยท 345,273
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 42 here โ alongside 41 others โ read 13 August 2026
@smokeforex1 ยท 36,371
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 70 here โ alongside 69 others โ read 2 September 2026
@HugoTradingxGOLD ยท 26,260
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 63 here โ alongside 62 others โ read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegramโs list for THAT channel, not this one โ see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐ฎ๐น๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ต ๐ท๐ฐ๐ท๐บ ๐โ (@GoldInsighthub525), 31,103 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/GoldInsighthub525.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.